Moscow State University. M.V. Lomonosov (Department of Socio-Cultural Design and Development of Territories, Professor)
Moskva, Moscow, Russian Federation
The relevance of the presented research is determined by the fact that after Russia's withdrawal from the Bologna system, the search for the best option for the domestic system of higher education as the closest to the period of subsequent professional activity of a person continues. In this regard, it is of interest to consider the accumulated historical experience of approaches to training through the prism of increasing the efficiency of human labor activity. The purpose of the presented research is to identify the relationship between the components of the direction of organizational training as a way to improve one's own knowledge from an educational standpoint and schools of strategic management as one of the key components of practical activity. The scientific novelty of the obtained results lies in the definition of the logical relationship of the main components of the direction of organizational learning as a way to improve one's own knowledge (intuition, interpretation, integration, institutionalization), considered from an educational standpoint, with the main schools of strategic management (including groups of prescriptive, descriptive and integrating schools), considered from the standpoint of practical economic activity. The practical significance of the obtained results lies in the possibility of taking them into account when constructing models of higher and postgraduate education systems.
relationship between components, directions of organizational training, a way to improve one's own knowledge, schools of strategic management
1. Argyris, C. Teaching Smart People How to Learn. Harvard Business Review (69, 3, May–June 1991: 99–109).
2. Argyris, C. Increasing Leadership Effectiveness (New York: Wiley, 1976).
3. Argyris, C., and Schon, D. A. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective (Read ing, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1978).
4. Bettis, R. A., and Prahalad, C. K. The Dominant Logic: Retrospective and Extension. Strategic Management Journal (16, 1995: 3–14).
5. Boisot, M. H., ed. Information Space: A Framework for Learning in Organizations, Institutions and Culture (London: Routledge, 1995).
6. Conner, K. R., and Prahalad, C. K. A Resource–Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Ver sus Opportunism. Organization Science (7, 5 [September–October] 1996: 477–501).
7. Crossan, M., Lane, H., and White, R. Organizational Learning: Toward Theory. Working Paper (London, Ontario: Richard Ivey School of Business, University of Western Ontario, 1997.
8. Cyert, R. M., and March, J. G. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pren tice Hall, 1963)
9. Elfring, T., and Volberda, H. W. New Directions in Strategy: Beyond Fragmentation (London: Sage, forthcoming in 1998; also early draft, 1994).
10. Hamel, G. Killer Strategies that Make Shareholders Rich. Fortune (June 23, 1997: 70–88).
11. Hamel, G. Strategy as Revolution. Harvard Business Review (July–August, 1996: 69—82).
12. Hamel, G., and Prahalad, C. K. Strategic Intent. Harvard Business Review (May–June 1989: 63–76).
13. Hamel, G., and Prahalad, C. K. Strategy as Stretch and Leverage. Harvard Business Review (71, 2, March–April 1993: 75–84).
14. Hamel, G., and Prahalad, C. K. Competing for the Future (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1994).
15. Hamel, G., Doz, Y. L., and Prahalad, C. K. Collaborate with Your Competitors and Win. Harvard Business Review (January–February 1989: 133–139).
16. Itami, H., with T. W. Roehl. Mobilizing Invisible Assets (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987)
17. Nonaka, I., and Takeuchi, H. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation (New York; Oxford University Press, 1995).
18. Normann, R. Management for Growth (New York: Wiley, 1977).
19. Polanyi, M. The Tacit Dimension. London: Routledge &. Kegan Paul, 1966.
20. Prahalad, C. K., and Bettis, R. A. The Dominant Logic: A New Linkage Between Diver sity and Performance. Strategic Management Journal (7, 1986: 485–501).
21. Prahalad, C. K., and Hamel, G. The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review (68, 3, May–June 1990: 79–91).
22. Schon, D. A. Organizational Learning. In G. Morgan, ed., Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1983).
23. Senge, P. M. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization (New York: Doubleday, 1990)
24. Stalk, G., Evans, P., and Shulman, L. E. Competing on Capabilities: The New Rules of Corporate Strategy. Harvard Business Review (70, 2 [March] 1992: 54–69).
25. Tampoe, M. Exploiting the Core Competence of Your Organization. Long-Range Planning (27, 4, 1994: 60–77).
26. Vuzy Rossii pereydut na novuyu sistemu obrazovaniya k 2026 godu. Kakie izmeneniya zhdut studentov. https://rg.ru/2023/06/07/ushla-na-bazu.html (data obrascheniya 01.08.2024)
27. Mincberg G. Strategicheskoe safari: Ekskursiya po debryam strategicheskogo menedzhmenta / Genri Mincberg, Bryus Al'strand, Zhozef Lampel'; Per. s angl. — M.: Al'pina Pablisher, 2013. — 367 s.
28. Rossiya otkazyvaetsya ot Bolonskoy sistemy — bakalavriata i magistratury. Kak izmenitsya obrazovanie i chto zhdet studentov? https://lenta.ru/articles/2022/05/26/bolonsky/ (data obrascheniya 01.08.2024)
29. Tebekin A.V. Ispol'zovanie bazovyh polozheniy shkoly obucheniya Ch. Lindbloma v interesah razvitiya sistemy obrazovaniya s uchetom vyzovov HHI veka // Zhurnal pedagogicheskih issledovaniy. 2024. T. 9. № 1. S. 30-43.
30. Tebekin A.V. Ispol'zovanie postulatov shkoly obucheniya strategicheskogo menedzhmenta v interesah razvitiya personala organizacii s uchetom vyzovov HHI veka // Teoreticheskaya ekonomika. 2024. № 2 (110). S. 66-79.
31. Tebekin A.V. Ispol'zovanie strategii obucheniya v razvitii professional'noy organizacii: teoretiko-metodologicheskiy aspekt // Professional'noe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire. 2023. T. 13. № 4. S. 623-636.
32. Tebekin A.V. Paradigma orientacii na razrabotku effektivnyh strategiy vzamen strategiy s effektnymi formulirovkami v shkole obucheniya Ch. Lindbloma // Zhurnal filosofskih issledovaniy. 2023. T. 9. № 2. S. 42-54.
33. Tebekin A.V. Perehod ot formulirovaniya strategii k ee formirovaniyu kak put' obespecheniya effektivnosti razvitiya v shkole obucheniya Ch. Lindbloma // Transportnoe delo Rossii. 2023. № 6. S. 146-151.
34. Tebekin A.V. Postulaty shkoly obucheniya strategicheskogo menedzhmenta Charl'za Lindbloma: filosofskiy aspekt // Zhurnal filosofskih issledovaniy. 2023. T. 9. № 3. S. 45-58.
35. Tebekin A.V. Rol' razvivayuscheysya strategii shkoly obucheniya Ch. Lindbloma v povysheniya effektivnosti funkcionirovaniya organizacii v sovremennyh usloviyah // Transportnoe delo Rossii. 2024. № 3. S. 93-100.
36. Tebekin A.V. Social'no-ekonomicheskie problemy realizacii podhodov k obucheniyu v zven'yah «individ-gruppa-organizaciya», osuschestvlyaemyh v interesah naraschivaniya ob'emov znaniy // Zhurnal pedagogicheskih issledovaniy, 2024, tom 9, №3, s.3-17.
37. Tebekin A.V. Filosofiya inkrementalizma kak klyuch k ponimaniyu processov formirovaniya strategiy razvitiya v shkole obucheniya Ch. Lindbloma // Teoreticheskaya ekonomika. 2023. № 8 (104). S. 12-24.
38. Tebekin A.V., Mitropol'skaya-Rodionova N.V., Horeva A.V. Logicheskiy inkrementalizm kak bazovaya osnova formirovaniya strategiy razvitiya v nauchnoy shkole obucheniya Ch. Lindbloma // Transportnoe delo Rossii. 2023. № 4. S. 81-88.
39. Tebekin A.V., Mitropol'skaya-Rodionova N.V., Horeva A.V. Filosofiya shkoly obucheniya Ch. Lindbloma: effektivnost' na smenu effektnosti // Transportnoe delo Rossii. 2023. № 3. S. 43-48.
40. Tebekin A.V., Tebekin P.A. Vliyanie shkol strategicheskogo menedzhmenta i marketinga na sovremennoe razvitie podhodov k upravleniyu. // Vestnik Moskovskogo finansovo-yuridicheskogo universiteta MFYuA. 2019. № 3. S. 14-23.
