Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow State University. M.V. Lomonosov (Department of Socio-Cultural Design and Development of Territories, Professor)
Moskva, Moscow, Russian Federation
The transition from the fifth technological order to the sixth one that is taking place in the world economy will naturally entail radical changes not only in the structure of the economy, but also in the content of business processes. It is appropriate to assume that as the sixth technological order develops, the organization of business processes may undergo the same revolutionary changes that took place in the 1980s after the fourth technological order was replaced by the fifth one, known as business process reengineering, and called by their creators Michael Hammer and James Champy nothing less than the "Manifesto of the Business Revolution". Due to the fact that when the sixth technological order replaces the fifth one, another revolution in business can be expected (conditional business process reengineering-2), there is an objective need to determine the possibilities and prospects for using existing business process modeling methodologies for these purposes. The purpose of the presented work is to study the possibilities and prospects for the development of the BPMN business process modeling methodology in the development of sixth-wave technologies and the expectation of the next revolution in business (business process reengineering-2). The scientific significance of the obtained results lies in the fact that, given the expected technological revolution associated with the onset of the sixth wave, within the framework of the hypothesis of a change in the paradigm of business process reengineering of the 1980s, a new paradigm of radical rethinking of business processes (conditionally designated reengineering-2), expected in the 2030s, it seems to supplement the main types of blocks of BPMN methodology models (private, abstract and interaction processes) with a block of modeling the transformation of business processes. The practical significance of the obtained results lies in the possibility of taking them into account when considering the directions of development of the methodology for modeling processes occurring in managed systems using the BPMN notation.
development of methodology, business process modeling, managed systems, BPMN notation
1. Object Management Group, “BMI Standard Specification 1.1,” (2008), http://www.omg. org/spec/BPMN/1.1/.
2. Object Management Group, “BMI Standard Specification 1.2,” (2009), http://www.omg. org/spec/BPMN/1.2/.
3. Object Management Group, “BMI Standard Specification 2.0,” (2011), http://www.omg. org/spec/BPMN/2.0/.
4. Object Management Group, “BMI Standard,” http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0.2/.(2014)
5. Oficial'naya dokumentaciya po BPMN elementam, https://camunda.com/bpmn/reference/.
6. Ceballos, H.G., Flores-Solorio, V., García-Vázquez, J.: A probabilistic BPMN normal form to model and advise human activities. In: Int. Workshop on Engineering Multi-Agent Systems. vol. 9318, pp. 51–69 (2015)
7. Endert, H., Küster, T., Hirsch, B., Albayrak, S.: Mapping bpmn to agents: An analysis. Agents, Web-Services, and Ontologies Integrated Methodologies pp. 43–58 (2007)
8. Stroppi, L.J.R., Chiotti, O., Villarreal, P.D.: Extending BPMN 2.0: Method and tool support. In: Int. Workshop of Business Process Model and Notation. vol. 95, pp. 59–73 (2011)
9. Chinosi, M., Trombetta, A. BPMN: An introduction to the standard. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 2012. 34(1), pp. 124–134. doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2011.06.002.
10. Recker J., Mendling J. On the translation between BPMN and BPEL: conceptual mismatch between process modeling Languages, in: Thibaud Latour, Michael Petit (Eds.), Proceedings 18th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Proceedings of Workshops and Doctoral Consortiums, 2006, pp. 521–532.
11. Ouyang C., Aalst W.M., M. Dumas, Hofstede A.H. From business process models to process-oriented software systems: the BPMN to BPEL way // Technical Report BPM-06-27, BPM Center, 2006.
12. Simpson S., “An XML Representation for Crew Procedures, Final Report NASA Faculty Fellowship Program (Johnson Space Center),” (2004).
13. White S., “Business Process Modeling Notation v1.0.” for the Business Process Management Initiative (BPMI) (May 2004).
14. Tebekin A. V., Mitropol'skaya-Rodionova N. V., Horeva A. V. (2022). Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya NIO.2 v ramkah shestogo tehnologicheskogo uklada // Noonomika i nooobschestvo: Al'manah trudov INIR im. S. Yu. Vitte. T. 1, № 2. S. 57-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37930/2782-618X-2022-1-2-57-75; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QAGMQQ
15. Hammer M., Champi Dzh. Reinzheniring korporacii: Manifest revolyucii v biznese. Per. s angl. — SPb.: Izdatel'stvo S.-Peterburgskogo universiteta, 1997. — 332 s.
16. Tebekin A.V., Mitropol'skaya-Rodionova N.V., Horeva A.V. ANALIZ TEHNOLOGII REINZhINIRINGA BIZNES-PROCESSOV "CELESOOBRAZNOE OB'EDINENIE NESKOL'KIH RABOT V ODNU" KAK INSTRUMENTA VYVODA IZ KRIZISA NACIONAL'NOY EKONOMIKI. // Zhurnal issledovaniy po upravleniyu. 2021. T. 7. № 3. S. 38-55. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UYUCPW
17. Tebekin A.V. MODELIROVANIE SISTEM UPRAVLENIYa DEYaTEL'NOST'Yu TAMOZhENNYH ORGANOV S ISPOL'ZOVANIEM METODOLOGII MODELIROVANIYa IDEF. // Vestnik Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii. 2015. № 4. S. 96-103. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UZEZQJ
