Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University (Institute of Pedagogy and Psychology, Scientific Consultant)
Kaluga, Kaluga, Russian Federation
UDK 37.018 Основные формы воспитания и обучения
UDK 37.013.41 Индивидуальная педагогика
The article examines the specifics of the implementation of educational activities in modern realities, in the context of the active entry into human life of means of virtual communication, which affected the life of a modern person and determined the specifics of self-identification and socialization of a maturing individual. A justified emphasis is placed on the need to implement the educational process, embodying the ideas of the methodology of existential pedagogy, focused on the formation of a personality ready for responsible independent choice and conscious design of one’s own life. A socially oriented game is designated as one of the pedagogical means contributing to the education of a free personality, ready to take responsibility for himself and his behavior. Its application is seen most clearly by the authors in the conditions of additional education, which provides ample opportunities for self-realization of the individual, taking into account his interests, individual capabilities and abilities. The article examines the characteristic features of socially oriented games, their functions, and the principles of their construction. A reasonable conclusion has been made that the use of socially oriented games contributes to the self-development of its participants, the accumulation of coping resources, and forms social competence. It is significant that in the process of socially orienting games, conditions are created that are oriented towards the participants conducting a moral reflection of their behavior and a moral examination of current events, which allows us to speak about the focus of this pedagogical tool on the formation of the existential and reflexive spheres of the individual, i.e. for awareness, acceptance and transmission of personal values and ideals.
socially oriented game, existential pedagogy, choice, education, educational potential
1. Antopol'skaya T.A., Panov V.I., Silakov A.S. Modelirovanie razvitiya sub'ektnosti podrostkov pokoleniya Z v usloviyah social'no-obogaschennoy sredy dopolnitel'nogo obrazovaniya // Gercenovskie chteniya: psihologicheskie issledovaniya v obrazovanii. 2020. — №3. — S.43—50.
2. Bayborodova L. V. Osobennosti organizacii dopolnitel'nogo obrazovaniya sel'skih shkol'nikov // Zhurnal pedagogicheskih issledovaniy. — 2020. — T.5. — № 6. — S. 33—42.
3. Gerasimov P. S. Aktivizaciya iniciativnogo vzaimodeystviya mezhdu uchastnikami obrazovatel'nogo processa posredstvom primeneniya novyh form raboty (kvestov, kvizov) // Zhurnal pedagogicheskih issledovaniy. – 2022. – T.7. – № 4. – S. 68-72.
4. Golovanov V. P. Sovremennoe dopolnitel'noe obrazovanie – prostranstvo schastlivogo i uspeshnogo detstva // Pedagogicheskoe iskusstvo. — 2021. — №2. — S.83—89.
5. Evladova E. B. Samoorganizaciya – perspektivnaya vozmozhnost' razvitiya dopolnitel'nogo obrazovaniya i vneurochnoy deyatel'nosti shkol'nikov // Obrazovatel'naya panorama. — 2018. — №1(9). — S.71—76.
6. Zolotareva A. V. Upravlenie obrazovatel'noy organizaciey. Razvitie uchrezhdeniya dopolnitel'nogo obrazovaniya detey : uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov. — 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. — M. : Izd-vo «Yurayt», 2020. — 286 s.
7. Ivanova I.V. Samorazvitie kak realizaciya proekta zhizni: glava v monografii // Teoretiko-metodologicheskie osnovaniya ekzistencial'noy pedagogiki : kollektivnaya monografiya. – V 2-h tt. - Tom.2 / pod nauch.red. M.I. Rozhkova. – Yaroslavl': Izd-vo YaGPU im. K.D. Ushinskogo, 2023.– 319s. - S.183-213.
8. Ivanova I.V., Rozhkov M.I. Preodolenie kak faktor samorazvitiya // Obrazovanie i samorazvitie. – 2024. – T.19. – №2. – S.54-69. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.19.2.05
9. Isakova M. G. Novye podhody formirovaniya motivacii k samorazvitiyu u molodezhi v usloviyah dopolnitel'nogo obrazovaniya // Zhurnal pedagogicheskih issledovaniy. – 2022. – T.7. – № 3. – S. 57-61.
10. Kostikova V. L. Vospitanie i socializaciya obuchayuschihsya v usloviyah dopolnitel'nogo obrazovaniya // Zhurnal pedagogicheskih issledovaniy. – 2022. – T.7. – № 3. – S. 62-66.
11. Kupriyanov B.V, Rozhkov M.I, Frishman I.I. Organizaciya i metodika provedeniya igr s podrostkami: Vzroslye igry dlya detey. Uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie. -M.: Vlados, 2000.-256 s.
12. Loginova L. G. Tochki otscheta izmeneniya dopolnitel'nogo obrazovaniya detey v kontekste sovremennyh vyzovov // Vospitanie shkol'nikov. — 2020. — №1. — S.58—63.
13. Miroshkina M.R. Raznye pokoleniya – raznyy pedagogicheskiy podhod // Shkol'nye tehnologii. — 2014. — № 2. — S.8—20.
14. Osipov G.V., Osmolovskaya T.V., Onipchenko O.G. Dopolnitel'noe obrazovanie kak faktor garmonichnogo razvitiya lichnosti // HYPERLINK "https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=48283125"Obrazovatel'nye tehnologii. – 2022. – HYPERLINK "https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=48283125&selid=48283139"№4. – S.87-95.
15. Reprincev A. V. Riski i protivorechiya formirovaniya cennostno-smyslovoy sfery lichnosti v «cifrovuyu» epohu // Teoretiko-metodicheskie osnovaniya ekzistencial'noy pedagogiki. Monografiya. – Yaroslavl': YaGPU, 2023. — S. 143—177.
16. Reprincev A. V. Sovremennye podhody i opyt issledovaniya cennostno-smyslovoy sfery podrostkov i molodezhi // Teoretiko-metodicheskie osnovaniya ekzistencial'noy pedagogiki: monografiya. — Yaroslavl': YaGPU, 2023. — S. 177—217.
17. Reprinceva E. A. Pedagogika igry: teoriya, istoriya, praktika. - Kursk : Izd-vo Kurs. gos. un-ta, 2005. - 421 s.
18. Rozhkov M. I., Ivanova I. V. Pedagogicheskoe soprovozhdenie samorazvitiya podrostkov v dopolnitel'nom obrazovanii v kontekste ekzistencial'nyh podhodov v pedagogike // Nizhegorodskoe obrazovanie. - 2017. - №4. - S.25-32.
19. Rozhkov M.I. Svoboda i vospitanie // Yaroslavskiy pedagogicheskiy vestnik. — 2016. — №4. - S.8-12.
20. Rozhkov M.I., Ivanova I.V. Kollektiv i mezhlichnostnye otnosheniya sovremennyh detey // Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika. Psihologiya. Sociokinetika. – 2022. – T. 28. – № 2. – S. 5–11. DOI: HYPERLINK "https://doi.org/10.34216/2073-1426-2022-28-2-5-11" \t "_blank"https://doi.org/10.34216/2073-1426-2022-28-2-5-11 HYPERLINK "https://doi.org/10.34216/2073-1426-2021-27-1-5-11" https://doi.org/10.34216/2073-1426-2021-27-1-5-11
21. Rozhkov M.I., Ivanova I.V. Social'no-orientiruyuschie igry kak faktor ekzistencial'nogo vybora v usloviyah dopolnitel'nogo obrazovaniya // Vestnik Kaluzhskogo universiteta. Seriya 1. Psihologicheskie nauki. Pedagogicheskie nauki. – 2024.- T.7. – №1(22). – S.18-25 DOI: HYPERLINK "https://doi.org/10.54072/26586568_2024_7_1_18" \t "_blank"https://doi.org/10.54072/26586568_2024_7_1_18
22. Sergeeva E.A., Obrezkova A.V. Ispol'zovanie vozmozhnostey dopolnitel'nogo obrazovaniya v formirovanii individual'noy traektorii uspeha // Zhurnal pedagogicheskih issledovaniy. – 2020. – T.7. – № 5. – S.79-84.
23. «Cifrovoe pokolenie» i pedagogicheskie realii sovremennoy Rossii: materialy nauchno-prakticheskoy internet-konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem ; pod red. M.R. Miroshkinoy, E.B. Evladovoy, S.V. Lobyncevoy. — M.: Institut izucheniya detstva, sem'i i vospitaniya Rossiyskoy akademii obrazovaniya, 2017. — 273s.
24. Hezinga Y. Homo Ludens. V teni zavtrashnego dnya; per. s niderl. i primech. V. V. Oshisa; obsch. red. i poslesl. - M.: Progress, Progress – Akademiya, 1992. – 458s. ISBN 5-01-002053-X (v per.).
25. Shakurov, R.H. Bar'er kak kategoriya i ego rol' v deyatel'nosti / R.H. Shakurov // Voprosy psihologii. — 2001. — №1. — S.13—16.
26. Shmakov S.A. Igry uchaschihsya-fenomen kul'tury. – M.: Novaya shk., 1994. - 238 s. ISBN 5-7301-0064-7.
27. El'konin D.B. Psihologiya igry. - 2-e izd. – M.: VLADOS, 1999. – 358s. ISBN 5-691-00256-2.
28. Yakovlev S.V. Avtoritet pedagoga i uvazhenie k nemu kak uslovie formirovaniya personal'nyh cennostey vospitannikov // Srednee professional'noe obrazovanie. − 2008. − № 2. − S. 8−10.
29. Yakovlev S.V. Vospitannost' kak sociokul'turnaya identichnost' sistem cennostey bazovoy kul'tury lichnosti i tradicionnoy kul'tury obschestva // Zhurnal pedagogicheskih issledovaniy. - 2024. – T.9. - №1. - S.54-68.
30. Dimmock M. Defining generations: Where millennials end and post-millennials begin, pew research center. – 2019. Available at: HYPERLINK "http://www/" https://www. pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/] (data obrascheniya: 20.06.2024).
31. McCrindle M. Generations Defi McCrindle Research Center. — 2019. Available at: https://mccrindle.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/ Generations-Defined-Sociologically.pdf (data obrascheniya: 20.06.2024).
32. Smirnov R.G. Operationalization of the “Online Generation” phenomenon // Digital sociology. — 2019. — Vol. 2. — No 4. — Rp. 31—38. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2019-4-31-38 (data obrascheniya: 20.06.2024).
33. Twenge J. How Are Generations Named? Trend. The Pew Charitable Trusts. — 2018. Available at: https://trend.pewtrusts.org/en/archive/winter-2018/ foreword-how-are-generations-named. (data obrascheniya: 20.06.2024).
