The article analyzes the issues related to the identification of the essence and peculiarities of professional adaptation of personnel, problems of attitude to unification into groups, the degree of satisfaction: labor activity, working conditions, position in the team, the nature of interactions and relationships in the organization, in the team, themselves and the results of their work, assessment of collectivism. The study used the questionnaire "Assessment of socio-psychological professional adaptation" by M.A. Dmitrireva and "Methodology for determining integral satisfaction with labor" by A.V. Batarshev, the sample was 208 people. As a result of the study, factors were identified that negatively affect the system of adaptation of recruiting agency specialists: a low level of collectivism, as a result of low team cohesion; low level of self-satisfaction of specialists at work; low level of satisfaction of specialists with achievements in the work. Among the main directions of improving the personnel adaptation system, the following areas are proposed: increasing the level of collectivism by introducing communication games on team cohesion, as well as organizing intellectual timbuilding for specialists; formation of Total Rewards intangible motivation. This motivation system will allow employees to maintain a balance between work and life and feel their own value; Development of a quarterly performance compensation system. This method will allow for regular assessment of staff achievements.
professional adaptation, personnel, professional environment, organizational behavior, socio-psychological climate, labor potential, working capacity, personnel management, human resources
1. Ayperatova O. 5 noveyshikh tendentsiy v sfere adaptatsii personala [5 latest trends in the field of personnel adaptation]. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie yavleniya i protsessy [Socio-economic phenomena and processes]. 2020, I. 1, pp. 21-24.
2. Baranova T. Klyuchevye momenty v adaptatsii personala [Key points in personnel adaptation]. Spravochnik po upravleniyu personalom [Handbook of personnel management]. 2019, I. 4, pp. 32-35.
3. Kraynova E. Adaptatsiya molodogo sotrudnika: s chego nachat'? [Adaptation of a young employee: where to start?]. Executive.ru [Executive.ru].
4. Pakhuta M.O. Otsenka effektivnosti protsessa adaptatsii: rossiyskaya praktika [Assessment of the effectiveness of the adaptation process: Russian practice]. Kadrovik. Kadrovyy menedzhment [Kadrovik. HR management]. 2018, I. 3, pp. 23-26.
5. Perederiy V.A. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya v menedzhmente [Sociological research in management]. Krasnodar: KubGAU Publ., 2015. 81 p.
6. Perederiy V.A., Skripnichenko L.S. Issledovanie predstavleniy kubanskogo studenchestva ob upravlencheskoy deyatel'nosti: spetsifika i osnovnye kharakteristiki [Research of Kuban students' ideas about management activity: specificity and main characteristics]. Obshchestvo: sotsiologiya, psikhologiya, pedagogika [Society: sociology, psychology, pedagogy]. 2018, I. 2, pp. 19-23.
7. Peshkova D.M. K voprosu ob adaptatsii personala v sovremennykh usloviyakh [On the question of personnel adaptation in modern conditions]. Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya i innovatsii [Modern scientific research and innovations]. 2020, I. 10, pp. 16-18.
8. Gajda J. Social and Professional Adaptation of Employees as a Main Factor in Shaping Working Conditions // Journal of US-China Public Administration. October 2015. Vol. 12. No. 10, p. 789-795.
9. Yongsheng T. Adapting to International System Change // Contemporary International Relations. №4. T.24. 2014. p.40-42.
10. Varačinskaitė G. Čepienė A. Analysis of professional adaptation problems of social workers // Professional studies: Theory and Practice. 2016. № 2 (17). p. 49-55.
