student from 01.01.2019 to 01.01.2020
Moskva, Moscow, Russian Federation
The article describes major problems of R&D personnel management in the aerospace industry. This paper considers actual personnel policy of Russian research enterprise, which is one of the world is leading spacecraft companies. Continued rapid growth of Industry 4.0 reveals the readiness of a modern society to accept new business conditions and use new ways of communication. The largest companies in each industry sector, in turn, are taking significant steps to reorganize technological processes, integrate new business mechanisms, as well as improve tools for managing resources, including human resources. Aerospace is undoubtedly the most high-tech manufacturing sector, which requires its participants to constantly develop innovative potential, develop new technical and technological solutions and their useful practical application. Therefore, the possibility of success in this area depends directly on scientists. The author carried out a sociological research by polling R&D employees of this company and its findings revealed significant shortcomings of the existing personnel management system such as incorrect tools for assessing the innovative performance of R&D personnel. These shortcomings inhibit reaching the goals and aims of the company. Therefore, the main steps to improve the existing R&D personnel management system in the aerospace industry are proposed.
research and development personnel management, scientific and technical personnel, rotation scientific and technical personnel, stimulating of scientific research, high-tech companies
1. Belyakov P.G., Ereemeeva S.V. Instrumenty ocenki i upravleniya razvitiem innovacionnogo potenciala naukoemkogo predpriyatiya raketno-kosmicheskoj promyshlennosti [Tools for assessing and managing the development of the innovative potential of a science-intensive enterprise in the rocket and space industry]. Moscow: ANO ID «Nauchnoe obozrenie» Publ., 2016.
2. Vershinin I. O gosudarstvennom zadanii v sfere nauki v svete mezhdunarodnogo opyta [On the state task in the field of science in the light of international experience]. Obshchestvo i ekonomika [Society and economy]. 2016, I. 11, pp. 5-22.
3. Zvezdilin A.YU., Tihonova O.B. Motivaciya personala kak funkciya upravleniya innovacionno-orientirovannoj organizaciej [Personnel motivation as a management function of an innovation-oriented organization]. Terra Economicus [Terra Economicus]. 2007, V. 5, I. 1-2, p. 106.
4. ROSKOSMOS [ROSCOSMOS]. Osnovnye polozheniya Federal'noj kosmicheskoj programmy 2016-2025-2016 [Main provisions of the Federal Space Program 2016-2025-2016]. Available at: https:// www.roscosmos.ru / 22347
5. Teplyh G.V. Drajvery innovacionnoj aktivnosti promyshlennyh kompanij v Rossii [Drivers of innovative activity of industrial companies in Russia]. Prikladnaya ekonometrika [Applied Econometrics]. 2015, I. 2 (38), pp. 83-110.
6. Aino Kiantoa, Josune Sáenzb, Nekane Aramburub. Knowledge-based human resource management practices, intellectual capital and innovation// Journal of Business Research. 2017. Vol.11. Pp. 11-20
7. Amanda C. Simões da Silva, Mischel Carmen N. Belderrain, Francisco Carlos M. Pantoja. Prioritization of R&D projects in the aerospace sector: AHP method with ratings// Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management. 2010. Vol.2, n.3. Pp.339-348
8. Beltrán-Martín, Inmaculada; Bou Llusar, Juan Carlos. Examining the intermediate role of employee abilities, motivation and opportunities to participate in the relationship between HR bundles and employee performance. BRQ Business Research Quarterly. 2018. Vol. 21. Pp. 99-110
9. Effendi Mohamad, Mohd Razali Muhamad, Rohana Abdullah, Adi Saptari. A Study on the Development of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) at an Aerospace Manufacturing Company//Journal Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2010. Vol. 2 (2). Pp. 1-17
10. EnriqueRodríguez-SeguraaIsabel, Ortiz-Marcosa José. Critical success factors in large projects in the aerospace and defense sectors// Journal of Business Research. 2016. Vol. 69. Pp.5419-5425
11. Grigorii Teplykh Analysis of the Innovation Activities of Firms Using the CDM Approach. Problems of Economic Transition. 2016. Vol. 58 (5), Pp. 443-462
12. Jun-YouLin Effects on diversity of R&D sources and human capital on industrial performance// Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2014. Vol. 85. Pp.168-184
13. Klas Eric Soderquist, Armelle Godener Performance Measurement in R&D and New Product Development: Setting the Scene// International Journal of Business Performance Management. 2004. Vol. 6(2). Pp.107-132
14. Koichiro Onishi The effects of compensation plans for employee inventions on R&D productivity: New evidence from Japanese panel data// Research Policy. 2012. Vol. 42. Pp.367-378
15. Mostafa Jafari, Jalal Rezaeenour, Peyman Akhavan and Mehdi N. Fesharaki Strategic Knowledge Management in Aerospace Industries: A Case Study// Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology. 2013. Vol. 82(1). Pp.60-74
16. Negin Salimia, Jafar Rezaeib Evaluating firms’ R & D performance using best worst method// Evaluation and Program Planning. 2018. Vol. 66. Pp. 147-155
17. Rasa Laliene, Algimantas Sakalas Development of R&D effectiveness assessment system in the research organizations// Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014. Vol. 156. Pp. 340-344
18. Robert J. W. Tijssen, Jos J. Winnink Capturing ‘R&D excellence’: indicators, international statistics, and innovative universities//Scientometrics. 2018. Vol.114. Pp.687-699
19. Sang-Bing Tsai1, Chih-Yao Huang, Cheng-Kuang Wang, Quan Chen Using a Mixed Model to Evaluate Job Satisfaction in High-Tech Industries// PLOS ONE. 2016. Vol. 11(5). Pp. 1-13
20. ShokoHanedaa, Keiko Ito Organizational and human resource management and innovation: Which management practices are linked to product and/or process innovation? // Research Policy. 2016. Vol. 47. Pp.194-208"
21. Xiong Min-peng; Zhou Xiao-hu; Duan xin Modeling of Engineering R&D Staff Performance Appraisal Model Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation// Systems Engineering Procedia. 2012. Vol. 4. Pp. 236-242
22. Rishabh Jaina, Nikhil Koratkar Quantifying a scientist's intellectual leadership// Carbon. 2019. Vol. 150. Pp. 485-488
23. Gupeng Zhanga, XiaoWangb, HongboDuan How does the collaboration with dominant R&D performers impact new R&D employees' innovation performance in different cultural contexts? A comparative study of American and Chinese large firms// Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2016. Vol. 148. Pp.156-169
