In presented to attention of readers article the author attempted to analyze the scientific relevance and practical relevance for the modern system of public administration the problems of bureaucracy and red tape. The article explores the basic qualitative characteristics and peculiarities of functioning of the state apparatus, the difficulties of optimization of style, performance, problematic and contradictory nature of overcoming corruption and bureaucratic pathologies, threats, dysfunctions and other deformations in the practice of human resource management and public administration in General. It is emphasized that at some point the corrupt and bureaucratic mechanisms become latent shadow control system, which resist very difficult. In the result remain on top of the bureaucracy, the corruption, the brutality, the callousness and irresponsibility, and at the bottom of legal nihilism, distrust in the sincerity of the authorities ‘ double standards. In confirmation are the concrete facts relevant statistical and sociological data. In parallel, we analyze the phenomenon of bureaucracy, explores the essence of bureaucracy and corruption, their causes and origins, manifestations, shadow side and negative social consequences. This article presents some value judgments made appropriate generalizations and conclusions, analyzes the actions taken by the state for the improvement of personnel management and guidance of proper administrative procedure in the public administration and civil service. Formulated proposals which, in the opinion of the author, will help to more efficiently realize the tasks put by the state in terms of bureaucratic control and innovation updates of the struggle against formalism, assessorship, corruption and corporate reticence.
administrative resource, public administration, bureaucracy, debureaucratization, personnel, personnel policy, corruption, moral foundations to official relations, personnel, anti-corruption, professionalism.
Вопросы коррупции и бюрократических деформаций управленческих отношений всегда находились в поле зрения политиков, ученых и широких слоев общественности. Соответствующая политическая, правовая и нравственная оценка такого рода проявлениям дана давно и однозначно. Она хорошо известна. Это «спиритуализм государства» и «замкнутость общества в государстве» [3, с. 270, 271], узурпация власти и стремление чиновничества к неограниченности полномочий, формализм и канцелярщина, дискредитация любых реформ и деформирование всех прогрессивных преобразований. Результат тоже известен: «сверху водворяется господство официальной лжи, а внизу парит полный произвол» [19, с. 556] — оценка начала прошлого столетия, но ее актуальность никто и сегодня не ставит под сомнение, ее объективность и справедливость сохраняются в полном объеме.
1. Atamanchuk G.V. Novoe gosudarstvo: poiski, idlyuzii, vozmozhnosti [The new government: a quest idlyuzii opportunities]. Moscow, 1996, p. 95. (223 p.).
2. Gosudarstvennoe antikrizisnoe upravlenie [State crisis management]. Moscow, Yurayt Publ., 2016, pp. 155-182. (371 p.)
3. Marks K. K kritike gegelevskoy filosofii [Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Law]. V. 1, pp. 270-271.
4. Medvedev D.A.: nasha demokratiya nesovershenna, my eto ponimaem, no my idem vpered. 24 noyabrya 2010 goda [Our democracy is not perfect, we understand, but we go forward. November 24, 2010]. Available at: youtube.com›watch?v=sRf8ylkFyKs
5. Medvedev D.A. Vystuplenie na plenarnom zasedanii XV Mezhdunarodnogo investitsionnogo foruma «Sochi-2016» 30 sentyabrya 2016 [Speech at the plenary session of the XV International Investment Forum “Sochi-2016” September 30, 2016]. Available at: government.ru›Novosti›24729
6. Okhotskiy E.V. Upravlencheskaya kul’tura gosudarstvennogo sluzhashchego sovremennoy formatsii [Administrative culture of civil servant modern formation]. Pravo i upravlenie. XXI vek [Law and Management. XXI Century]. 2009, I. 4, pp. 41-51.
7. Okhotskiy E.V., Kosenko O.I. Stanovlenie sotsial’nogo gosudarstva v sovremennoy Rossii: analiz tendentsiy. Materialy zasedaniya nauchnogo soveta ATiSO [Becoming a social state in modern Russia: the analysis of trends. Proceedings of the meeting of the scientific council of ATIS]. Moscow, ATiSO Publ., 2009, pp. 84-85 (143 p.).
8. Okhotskiy E.V., Smol’kov V.G. Byurokratiya i byurokratizm [Bureaucracy and red tape]. Moscow, RAGS Publ., 1996, pp. 40-41, 73 (129 p.)
9. Polkovnik na milliardakh [Colonel on billions]. Rossiyskaya gazeta [the Russian newspaper]. 2016, p. 3.
10. Poslanie Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii Federal’nomu Sobraniyu 18 aprelya 2002 g. [Message from the President of the Russian Federation Federal Assembly April 18, 2002]. Available at: http://www.kremlin.ru
11. Poslanie Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii Federal’nomu Sobraniyu 25 aprelya 2005 g. [Message from the President of the Russian Federation Federal Assembly April 25, 2005]. Available at: http://www.kremlin.ru
12. Poslanie Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii Federal’nomu Sobraniyu 5 noyabrya 2008 g. [Message from the President of the Russian Federation Federal Assembly, November 5, 2008]. Available at: http://www.kremlin.ru
13. Okhotskiy E.V., Romanov V.L., Sokolov V.M. Preodolenie byurokratizma v kontekste nravstvennogo ozdorovleniya gosudarstvennoy sluzhby [Overcoming bureaucracy in the context of the moral health of the public service]. Administrativnaya etika [Administrative ethics]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 1999, pp. 144-173. (333 p.)
14. Putin V.V. Vstupitel’noe slovo na plenarnom zasedanii X Mezhdunarodnogo investitsionnogo foruma «Sochi-2011» 16 sentyabrya 2011 goda [Opening speech at the plenary session of the X International Investment Forum “Sochi-2011” September 16, 2011]. Available at: http://www.kremlin.ru
15. Rossiyane: chtoby popast’ v elitu, nuzhny den’gi i svyazi [Russians: to get into the elite, we need money and connections]. Available at: rg.ru›2005/09/05/elita.html
16. Sergeev M. Ekonomika polkovnika Zakharchenko [Economy Colonel Zakharchenko]. Nezavisimaya gazeta [Independent newspaper]. 2016, p. 3.
17. Solov’eva O. Delovoy turizm rastsvetaet v krizis [Business blooms in crisis]. Nezavisimaya gazeta [Independent newspaper]. 2016, p. 4.
18. Sukharenko A. Korruptsionnyy Klondayk [Corruption Klondike]. Nezavisimaya gazeta [Independent newspaper]. 2016, p. 4.
19. Tikhomirov L.A. Monarkhicheskaya gosudarstvennost’ [Monarchical state]. St. Petersburg, GUP «Oblizdat» Publ., TOO «Alir» Publ., 1992, p. 556. (672 p.)
20. Turchinov A.I., Magomedov K.O., Kanonenko T.A. Sotsiologicheskiy analiz problem kadrovoy politiki i upravleniya personalom v rossiyskikh organizatsiyakh [The sociological analysis of problems of personnel policy and personnel management in Russian companies]. Moscow, MAKS Press Publ., 2011, p. 10, 20. (304 p.)
21. Chayka Yu.Ya. Doklad General’nogo prokurora RF na zasedanii Soveta Federatsii Federal’nogo Sobraniya RF 27 aprelya 2011 g. [Report of the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation at a meeting of the Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation April 27, 2011]. Available at: http:// genproc.gov.ru/genprokuror/appearances/document-71822.
22. Available at: Finlit.online/makroekonomika-.
23. Available at: Transparency.org.ru›indeks-vospriiatiia…blog.
