Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
The anticompetitive behavior of participants in tenders for the right to conclude contracts for the fishing of aquatic biological resources reduces the effectiveness of the financial and economic mechanism for resource provision in the field of industrial fisheries, which actualizes the scientific task of forming and testing methods for assessing financial losses for the budget. The purpose of the study is to develop a methodology for assessing budget losses as a result of anticompetitive strategies during tenders for the right to conclude a contract for the provision of fishing areas. The research methodology is based on theoretical approaches and concepts that substantiate the advantages of a competitive model in determining the amount of contributions for the use of natural objects. The research methodology assumes an assessment of budget losses as a result of the use of anticompetitive strategies by participants in competitions and allows us to determine alternative indicators of the cost proposals of the winner using the strategy of anticompetitive behavior and a bona fide participant. The results of the study showed that during the competitive procedures, there is an application of an anti-competitive behavior strategy aimed at leveling the importance of the cost criterion in determining the winner of the competition. A concomitant negative effect of such a strategy is a reduction in payments to the budget for the use of the fishing area, since participants who adhere to a strategy of unfair behavior initially reduce the amount of fees, as they assume that this criterion will be leveled in the overall assessment. The identified cases in the course of this study allowed us to determine the damage to the budget in the amount of 31850 thousand rubles.
industrial fishing, mechanism, competition, collusion, budget, fees
1. Kuz'mickaya A.A. Analiz urovnya potrebleniya osnovnyh produktov pitaniya naseleniem kak vazhneyshey komponenty prodovol'stvennoy bezopasnosti regiona [Tekst] / A.A. Kuz'mickaya, O.N. Korosteleva, A.V. Kubyshkin [i dr.] // Agrarnaya nauka. — 2023. — № 7. — S. 155–162. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2023-372-7-155-162
2. Kolonchin K.V. Tendencii razvitiya akvakul'tury v Rossii: perspektivy kachestvennogo uluchsheniya prodovol'stvennoy bezopasnosti i ustoychivogo rosta ekonomicheskogo potenciala otrasli [Tekst] / K.V. Kolonchin, M.A. Truba, N.Yu. Kuzicheva // Prodovol'stvennaya politika i bezopasnost'. — 2023. — № 3. — S. 533–546. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18334/ppib.10.3.118265
3. Mucieva M.A. Regional'naya finansovaya politika kak faktor povysheniya effektivnosti prirodno-resursnogo kompleksa [Tekst] / M.A. Mucieva, N.D. Emirov // Nauchnyy zhurnal NIU ITMO. Seriya: Ekonomika i ekologicheskiy menedzhment. — 2021. — № 1. — S. 62–69. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17586/2310-1172-2021-14-1-62-69
4. Brinchuk M.M. Prirodnaya renta kak sredstvo obespecheniya estestvenno-pravovoy spravedlivosti [Tekst] / M.M. Brinchuk // Astrahanskiy vestnik ekologicheskogo obrazovaniya. — 2022. — № 3. — S. 171–180. – DOI:https://doi.org/10.36698/2304-5957-2022-3-171-180
5. Ushakov E.P. Rentnyy mehanizm prirodopol'zovaniya v Rossii [Tekst] / E.P. Ushakov // Nacional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost'. — 2012. — № 40. S. 2–11.
6. Kryukov V.A. Evolyuciya pravil i procedur, opredelyayuschih podhody k osvoeniyu mineral'no-syr'evyh resursov [Tekst] / V.A. Kryukov // Zhurnal ekonomicheskoy teorii. — 2016. — № 3. — S. 106–117.
7. Kozlov D.V. Dogovorno-razreshitel'nyy poryadok predprinimatel'skogo rybolovstva i rybovodstva [Tekst] / D.V. Kozlov // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. — 2017. — № 1. — S. 230–236. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2017.74.1.230-236
8. Rogachev A.F. Ekonomicheskaya ocenka primeneniya blefovyh strategiy pri provedenii aukcionov [Tekst] / A.F. Rogachev, A.A. Marchenko // Biznes. Obrazovanie. Pravo. — 2012. — № 1. — S. 182–186.
9. Skovoroda E.V. Metodika ocenki promyshlennymi predpriyatiyami konkursnyh predlozheniy po zakupke [Tekst] / E.V. Skvoroda // Trudy BGTU. Seriya 5: Ekonomika i upravlenie. — 2018. — № 1. — S. 134–138.
10. Bogolyubova V.S. Empiricheskaya ocenka vozdeystviya setevyh effektov na konkurentnye processy na rynke operacionnyh sistem [Tekst] / V.S. Bogolyubova // Upravlenec. — 2024. — T. 15. — № 2. — S. 79–95. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2024-15-2-6
11. Karpovich V. Kompleksnaya ocenka konkurentnyh usloviy otechestvennyh eksporterov na vneshnih agrarnyh rynkah po urovnyam ih geograficheskogo prioriteta dlya Respubliki Belarus' [Tekst] / V. Karpovich, E. Makucenya // Agrarnaya ekonomika. 2025. № 4. S. 3–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29235/1818-9806-2025-4-3-17
12. Smotrickaya I.I. Ocenka mul'tiplikativnogo effekta gosudarstvennyh rashodov: metodicheskiy podhod i empiricheskiy analiz [Tekst] / I.I. Smotrickaya, S.S. Shuvalov // Upravlenec. — 2025. — T. 16. — № 5. S. 2–17. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2025-16-5-1
13. Tkachenko I.N. Ocenka i upravlenie krizisnoy ustoychivost'yu predpriyatiy zhilischno-kommunal'nogo hozyaystva [Tekst] / I.N. Tkachenko, I.A. Chechulin // Journal of New Economy. — 2024. — T. 25. — № 1. — S. 48–52. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.29141/2658-5081-2024-25-1-7
14. Karh D.A. Intellektual'noe modelirovanie ocenki i vybora postavschikov v logistike na osnove tehnologiy nechetkogo upravleniya [Tekst] / D.A. Karh, A.A. Kopnin, D.T. Turaeva // Cifrovye modeli i resheniya. — 2025. T. 4. — № 4. — S. 81–93. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.29141/2949-477X2025-4-4-7
