Russian Federation
This article is devoted to the search for an answer to the question whether the promotion of socio-economic development is among the key priorities of using the budget potential of the subjects of the Russian Federation. To solve this problem, the study has developed methodological tools for assessing the use of the budget potential of the region. Mainly, it includes justification of priorities and directions of using the budget potential of the region, determination of the proportion of priorities and its dynamics, calculation of the importance of priorities based on a modified formula of their elasticity according to the maximum achieved budget potential of the region. In practice, the application of the developed methodological tools will make it possible to measure and adjust the ratio of directions and priorities for the use of the budget potential of the region, depending on the goals and conditions of the development of the social sphere and the economy. According to the developed tools, as well as on the basis of official reporting data from the Federal Treasury, the Federal State Statistics Service, and the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, an approbation diagnosis of the use of budget potential was carried out on the example of 85 subjects of the Russian Federation over a 15-year period from 2006 to 2020. It was determined that 7/10 of the realized budget potential of the subjects of the Russian Federation was used for the current priority, 2/10 — for transfer, 1/10 — for investment. The empirical results obtained in the work confirmed the hypothesis that the use of budget resources of regions for short-term stabilization purposes is more important than financing longterm stimulation of socio-economic development of territories. According to the results of the approbation, ways to increase the efficiency of using the budget potential of the region to stimulate its socio-economic development are identified.
budget expenditures, government program, socio-economic development, stimulation, budget capacity, regions
1. Bukina I.S. Prioritety byudzhetno-nalogovoy politiki Rossiyskoy Federacii v 2017 godu [Tekst] / I.S. Bukina // Federalizm. — 2018. — № 1. S. 42–61.
2. Buklemishev O. Fiskal'noe stimulirovanie i rossiyskie byudzhetnye fondy [Tekst] / O. Buklemishev // Voprosy ekonomiki. — 2013. — № 12. — S. 74–85. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2013-12-74-85
3. Dombrovskiy E.A. Desyat' shagov k sbalansirovannosti byudzhetov sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federacii [Tekst] / E.A. Dombrovskiy // Finansy i kredit. — 2015. № 37. — S. 52–64.
4. Drobyshevskiy S. Dekompoziciya tempov rosta VVP v 2016–2019 gg. [Tekst] / S. Drobyshevskiy, M. Kazakova // Ekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii. — 2016. — № 6. S. 3–7.
5. Idrisov G. Formirovanie predposylok dolgosrochnogo rosta: kak ih ponimat'? [Tekst] / G. Idrisov, S. Sinel'nikov-Murylev // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2014. — № 3. — S. 4–20. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-87362014-3-4-20
6. Ilyuhin A.A. Makroekonomicheskiy analiz prognoza byudzheta Sverdlovskoy oblasti v usloviyah rosta rossiyskoy ekonomiki [Tekst] / A.A. Ilyuhin, S.I. Ponomareva, S.V. Ilyuhina // Upravlenec. – 2017. — № 6. S. 72–79.
7. Minakir P.A. Gosudarstvennyy regional'nyy dolg: tendencii i osobennosti formirovaniya [Tekst] / P.A. Minakir, S.N. Leonov // Ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny: fakty, tendencii, prognoz. 2019. — T. 12. — № 4. — S. 26–41. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2019.4.64.2
8. Neshitoy A.S. Finansy i torgovlya v vosproizvodstvennom processe [Tekst] / A.S. Neshitoy. — M.: Dashkov i K, 2017. — 560 s.
9. Pechenskaya M.A. Regional'nye byudzhety: tendencii, sostoyanie, perspektivy [Tekst]: monografiya / M.A. Pechenskaya, A.I. Povarova. — Vologda: ISERT RAN, 2016. — 110 s.
10. Pechenskaya-Polischuk M.A. Celi i formy predostavleniya byudzhetnyh resursov regionam iz federal'nogo centra na bezvozmezdnoy osnove [Tekst] / M.A. Pechenskaya-Polischuk // Voprosy ekonomiki. – 2021. — № 11. S. 108–126. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-11-108-126
11. Pechenskaya-Polischuk M.A. Formirovanie byudzhetnogo potenciala regiona: teoriya i praktika [Tekst] / M.A. Pechenskaya-Polischuk. — Vologda: VolNC RAN, 2022. — 209 s.
12. Pivovarov I.S. Antikrizisnyy opyt Finlyandii: strukturno-institucional'nye reformy v promyshlennosti [Tekst] / I.S. Pivovarov // Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta ekonomiki i finansov. — 2012. № 6. — S. 69–75.
13. Polbin A.V., Sinel'nikov-Murylev S.G., Trunin P.V. Ekonomicheskiy krizis 2020 g.: prichiny i mery po ego preodoleniyu i dal'neyshemu razvitiyu Rossii [Tekst] / A.V. Polbin, S.G. Sinel'nikov-Murylev, P.V. Trunin // Voprosy ekonomiki. – 2020. — № 6. — S. 5–21. — DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-6-5-21
14. Rat'kovskaya T.G. Usloviya innovacionnogo razvitiya v Sibirskom federal'nom okruge: regional'naya differenciaciya [Tekst] / T.G. Rat'kovskaya // EKO. 2007. — № 4. — S. 51–69.
15. Sugarova I.V. Upravlenie finansami i vybor prioritetov byudzhetnoy politiki v obespechenii optimizacionnyh resheniy [Tekst] / I.V. Sugarova. — Vladikavkaz: Severo-Osetinskiy gos. un-t im. K.L. Hetagurova, 2016. — 207 s.
16. Suharev O.S. Byudzhetnye rashody, effektivnost' i prioritety razvitiya ekonomiki [Tekst] / O.S. Suharev // Finansovyy zhurnal. – 2015. — № 1. — S. 17–28.
17. Tatarkin D.A. Ocenka vliyaniya processa social'nogo vosproizvodstva na ekonomicheskoe razvitie regiona (na primere Sverdlovskoy oblasti) [Tekst] / D.A. Tatarkin, E.N. Sidorova // Ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny: fakty, tendencii, prognoz. — 2014. № 4. — S. 100–112. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.15838/esc/2014.4.34.9
18. Uskova T.V. Obschestvennye finansy regionov: prioritety modernizacii [Tekst] / T.V. Uskova, A.I. Povarova, V.S. Orlova. — Vologda: ISERT RAN, 2010. 168 s.
19. Baranov A.O., Pavlov V.N., Suslov V.I. (2013) The System of Dynamic Input-output Models for Forecasting the Development of Russian Economy at the National and Regional Levels [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://lib.ieie.nsc.ru/docs/2014/DevelopOfMacro&InterindMethods/Baranov.pdf
20. Boadway R., Shah A. (Eds.). (2007) Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers: Principles and Practice. Public Sector. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. 624 p.
21. Deaton A. (2001) Counting the world’s poor: problems and possible solutions // World Bank research Observer. Pp. 125–147. URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/17125/766640JRN0WBRO00Box 374385B00PUBLIC0.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
22. Deaton A. (2005) Measuring poverty in a growing world (or measuring growth in a poor world) / Review of Economics and Statistics. Pp. 1–19.
23. Deaton A. (2010) Price Indexes, Inequality, and the Measurement of World Poverty. American Economic Review. 100(1). Pp. 5–34.
24. Deaton A. (2014) Great escape: health, wealth, and the origins of inequality. Oxford: Princeton University Press.P. 376.
25. Glaeser E.L., La Porta R., Lopez de Silanes F., Shleifer A. (2004) Do institutions cause growth? // Journal of Economic Growth. No. 9. Pp. 271–303.
26. Kelleher C.A., Yackee S.W. (2004) An empirical assessment of devolution’s policy impact. The Public Studies Journal, vol. 32, pp. 253–270.
27. Keynes J. (1936) The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. P. 352.
28. Todaro M.P., Smith S.C. (2014) Economic development / Michael P. Todaro, London: Longman, p. 862. URL: https://mediasrv.aua.gr/eclass/modules/document/file.php/AOA215/ Economic%20Development%20-%20Todaro%20and%20smith.pdf
