Knowing of the history of profession is the basis of career self-identifi cation. The authors off er a series of research devoted to the study of the origin and evolution of such concepts as administration, management and HR-management. The fi rst part will study the problem of periodization of the history of management as a science, practices and phenomenon. The following parts of the work draw special attention to the evolution of HR-manager as a profession. The educational and scientifi c literature on the history of management off ers diff erent variants of periodization. Each scientist has his/her own views not only onthe criteria of periodization or on the point of origin but on the methodology of periodization in general. In this paper the authors attempted to compare diff erent approaches and identify key problem areas in the process of periodization of the evolution of management theory and practice.
periodization, management history, evolution of management theory, HR-management history.
Изучение любой дисциплины, будь то математический предмет или курс «Управление человеческими ресурсами», начинается с исторического экскурса к истокам возникновения объекта познания. Поскольку историю развития HR-менеджмента нельзя рассматривать вне взаимосвязи с другими направлениями менеджмента и науки об управлении в целом, в данной статье будут рассмотрены подходы различных авторов к описанию эволюции и к периодизации истории менеджмента.
Явно или неявно структура и логика курсов по истории менеджмента выстраивается на основе выделения некоторых периодов или этапов. Например, ставший наиболее переиздаваемым и признанным учебником по истории менеджмента «Эволюция управленческой мысли» Врена представляет материал по эрам:
- ранний этап развития управленческой мысли;
- эра научного менеджмента;
- эра человека социального;
- современная эра [22].
В монографии Витцеля изложение ведется также по хронологическому принципу с выделением определенных периодов: ранняя управленческая мысль, управленческая мысль в век торгового капитализма, управленческая мысль в эпоху Просвещения, эпоха научного менеджмента, эпоха человеческих отношений, век гуру менеджмента, управленческая мысль в эпоху Интернета [19]. Подобной логики придерживаются авторы отечественных учебников по истории менеджмента [7].
1. Weber M. Osnovnye sociologicheskie ponyatiya [The basic sociological concepts]. Zapadno-evropeiskaya sociologiya XIX-nachala XX vekov [Western European sociology of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries]. Moscow, 1996, pp. 455-491.
2. Weber M. Istoriya khozyaistva: Gorod [History of Economy: The City]. Moscow, Kanon-press-Z Publ., Kuchkovo Pole Publ., 2001.
3. Ovchinnikova N.V. Istoria upravlencheskoi mysli [History of Management Thought]. Moscow, RSUH Publ., 2013.
4. Drucker Peter. Postkapitalisticheskoye obchestvo [The postcapitalist society]. Novaya postindustrialnaya volna na Zapade. Antologia [New wave of post-industrial West. The anthology]. Мoscow, Academia Publ., 1999.
5. Kirdina S.G. Institutsionalnye matritsy i razvitie Rossii [Institutional matrix and growth of Russia]. Novosibirsk, IEiOPP RAS Publ., 2001.
6. Uorner M. Klassiki menedgmenta [Сlassic of management]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2001.
7. Kravchenko A.I. Istoria menegmenta [History of Management]. Moscow, Academic Project Publ., Triksta Publ., 2004.
8. Marshev V.I. Istoria upravlencheskoi mysli [History of Management Thought]. Мoscow, INFRA-М Publ., 2005.
9. Meskon M., Albert M., Hedouri F. Osnovy menegmenta [Principles of Management]. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2004.
10. Nort D., Uollis J., Waingast B. Nasilie i socialnye poryadki: Konceptualnye ramki dlya interpretazii pismennoy istorii chelovechestva. Institucionalnye issledovaniya kak buduchee socialnyh nauk [Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for the interpretation of the written history of mankind. Institutional research as the future of the social sciences]. Moscow, 2011.
11. Hazhinsky A. Guru menegmenta [Management guru]. St.Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2002.
12. Hailbroner Robert L. Filosofy ot mira sego. Velikie ekonomicheskie mysliteli: ih zhizn, epoha i idei [The philosophers of the world. The great economic thinkers: their life, epoch and ideas]. Moscow, Kolibri Publ., 2008.
13. Shtompka P. Sociologia socialnyh izmeneniy [Sociology of social changes]. Мoscow, 1996.
14. Cherbakov A.I. Sovokupnaya proizvoditelnost truda i osnovy ee gosudarstvennogo regulirovania [The aggregate labor productivity and the basis of its government regulation]. Moscow, RAGS Publ., 2004.
15. Adler, Paul S. (2003). Toward Collaborative Interdependence: A Century of Change in the Organization of Work’, in Bruce E. Kaufman, Richard A. Beaumont and Roy B. Helfgott (eds), Industrial Relations to Human Resources and Beyond: The Evolving Process of Employee Relations Management, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
16. Barley, Stephen-Kunda, Gideon (1992). Design and Devotion: Surges of Rational and Normative Ideologies of Control in Managerial Discourse. Management Sciences Quarterly, Vol. 37, No. 3, pр. 363-399.
17. Karsten Luchien (2014) Time as a periodization of management practices. Management & Organizational History, 9:4, 414-432.
18. Keulen, S., and R. Kroeze. 2014. “The era of management: a historical perspective on twentieth century management. Management and Organizational History, 9 (4).
19. Morgen Witzel. A History of Management Thought. First published 2012. by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon.
20. Ozcan Kerim, Barca Mehmet. The Evolutionary Dynamic of Management Thought: Environmental Determinism or Ideational Development? Today’s Review of Public Administration, Vol. 4, No. 1 March 2010, pр.1-37.
21. Wilson, John F., Thomson, Andrew. The Making of Modern Management. British Management in Historical Perspective, 2006. Oxford.
22. Wren Daniel A. and Bedeian A.G. The Evolution of Management Thought. Sixth Edition. 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
