Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
The article is devoted to the currently relevant topic of involvement in activities, but not the organization’s personnel, but future HR-managers in their learning process. The article presents various theoretical approaches to the defi nition of the concept of «involvement», «involvement of students», «student engagement», and also analyzes the factors infl uencing the degree of involvement of students in the learning process. A brief review of the literature on the study of the problem of involvement is given, the purpose of which is to form a general idea of the relevance and diffi culties in assessing involvement. The author off ers the experience of assessing the level of involvement of future specialists in the fi eld of personnel management in the process of their study at the university as an important factor in their successful development in a future profession. The author presents the results of a comparative analysis of changes in the level of involvement of students in the situation of using diff erent teaching methods in different years of study. The article focuses on the problem of the formation of professional competence of future HR-managers in the process of their training, and the connection of training success with involvement as a factor of motivation and increased interest in future professional activities. The article has a practical orientation, since studying the involvement of students in training will make it possible to adjust both the content and methods of training future HR managers taking into account not only the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standards of Higher Education, the professional standard of a personnel management specialist, the requirements of employers, but also the needs of the students themselves.
student involvement, professional competence, level of involvement, interactive teaching methods
1. Zakharova A. Nauchnye opredeleniya [Scientific definitions]. Zhurnal «Shtat» [Journal «State»]. 2011, 5. Available at: http://www.hrmedia.ru/node/450 (Accessed 6 April 2019)
2. Kostyuchik E.S. Sil'nyy brend: navstrechu vovlechennosti. Upravlenie proektami [Strong brand: towards involvement. Project management]. Spravochnik po upravleniyu personalom [Handbook of personnel management]. - 2013. - №3. - S. 14-18.
3. Maloshonok N.G. Vovlechennost' studentov v uchebnyy protsess v rossiyskikh vuzakh [The involvement of students in the educational process in Russian universities]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia]. 2014, I. 1, pp. 37-44. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vovlechennost-studentov-v-uchebnyy-protsess-v-rossiyskih-vuzah-1 (Accessed 6 April 2019).
4. Skriptunova E. Metodika rascheta indeksa vovlechennosti personala []Method of calculating the index of personnel involvement. Upravlenie chelovecheskim potentsialom [Human potential Management]. 2010, I. 2, p. 42.
5. Chernyak T.V., Badashkova A.I., Shtop A.A. Nauchno-issledovatel'skiy proekt kak innovatsionnyy metod formirovaniya professional'nykh kompetentsiy budushchikh HR-menedzherov (15-letniy opyt kafedry upravleniya personalom Sibirskogo instituta upravleniya) [Research Project as an Innovative Method of Forming the Professional Competencies of Future HR-Managers (15-Years Experience of the Personnel Management Department of the Siberian Institute of Management)]. Upravlenie personalom i intellektual'nymi resursami v Rossii [Human resources and intellectual resources management in Russia]. 2018, V. 7, I. 3. pp. 39-47. https://doi.or g/10.12737/article_5b5098f93bb726.15529925
6. Astin A. Student Involvement: a Developmental Theory for Higher Education // Journal of College Student Development. 1984. Vol. 25. No. 4.
7. Chapman E. Assessing Student Engagement Rates //ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation. 2003.
8. Coates H. Student Engagement in Campus-based and Online Education: University Connections, Taylor and Francis, London, 2006.
9. Coates H. The value of student engagement for higher education quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education, 2005, №11.
10. Kahn W.A. Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work. v metodikakh The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 33, №. 4, 1990, pp. 692-724.
11. Kuh G.D. Assesing What Really Matters to Student Learning: Inside the National Survey of Student Engagement // Change. 2001a. Vol. 33. No. 3.
12. Kuh G.D. The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual Framework and Overview of Psychometric Properties. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2001
13. Kuh G.D. What Student Engagement Data Tell Us about College Readiness // Peer Review. 2007. Vol. 9. No. 1. P. 4-8.
14. Kanungo R.N. Measurement of job and work involvement // Journal of Applied Psychology, 67. 1982. pp. 341- 349
15. MacLeod David & Clarke Nita. Engaging for Success: enhancing performance through employee engagement, 2009.
16. Frank F.D The race for talent: retaining and engaging workers in the 21st century / F.D. Frank, R.P. Finnegan, C.R. Taylor // Human Resource Planning. - 2004. - Vol 27, №3. - pp .2-25.
17. Ouweneel E., Le Blanc P.M. & Schaufeli W.B. Flourishing students: A longitudinal study on positive emotions, personal resources, and study engagement // The journal of positive psychology. 2011. 6(2). pp. 142-153.
18. Schaufeli W.B., Salanova M., González-Romá V. & Bakker A.B. The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach // Journal of Happiness studies. 2002. 3(1). pp. 71-92.
