REGULATORY FIXATION VARIABILITY IN THE CONCEPT OF “CULTURAL VALUES” IN THE EEU LEGISLATION
Rubrics: INTERNATIONAL AND INTEGRATIONAL LAW
Authors:
1.
FGAOU VO «Nacional'nyy issledovatel'skiy universitet «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki»
(kafedra konstitucionnogo i administrativnogo prava, zaveduyuschiy kafedroy)
Nizhniy Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation
Nizhniy Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation
2.
The National Research University Higher School of Economics - Nizhny Novgorod
(department of world economy and customs, associate professor)
Nizhny Novgorod Academy of Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs (department of theory and history of state and law, associate professor)
Russian Federation
Nizhny Novgorod Academy of Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs (department of theory and history of state and law, associate professor)
Russian Federation
Type:
Article
Pages:
from 1
to 1
Status:
Published
Received:
20.05.2019
Accepted:
20.05.2019
Published:
20.05.2019
Subject area:
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
BBK 67 Право. Юридические науки
BBK 67 Право. Юридические науки
Language:
Russian
Keywords:
kul'turnye cennosti, Evraziyskiy ekonomicheskiy soyuz, principy yuridicheskoy tehniki, mery netarifnogo regulirovaniya.
Abstract (English):
Nacional'noe dostoyanie kazhdogo gosudarstva, vklyuchaya kul'turnye cennosti, ohranyaetsya ego zakonodatel'stvom. Mezhdu tem suschestvuet razlichie v podhodah k opredeleniyu kul'turnyh cennostey v normativnyh aktah stran — uchastnic EAES, chto usugublyaetsya neodnoznachnost'yu tolkovaniya nekotoryh polozheniy mezhgosudarstvennyh aktov. Eto uvelichivaet risk uteri predmetov kul'turnogo naslediya i oslablyaet tamozhennyy kontrol' v hode peremescheniya kul'turnyh cennostey cherez tamozhennuyu granicu EAES. S pomosch'yu sravnitel'no-pravovogo i formal'no-yuridicheskogo metodov predprinyata popytka proanalizirovat' «kul'turnoe» zakonodatel'stvo vseh stran — uchastnic EAES v kontekste vyyavleniya osobennostey opredeleniya kul'turnyh cennostey, podpadayuschih pod ogranichitel'nyy pravovoy rezhim. Obrascheno vnimanie na otsutstvie unifikacii v zakonodatel'nom regulirovanii peremescheniya kul'turnyh cennostey cherez tamozhennuyu granicu EAES. Sformulirovan vyvod o neobhodimosti vnesti terminologicheskoe edinoobrazie v nacional'nye normativnye formulirovki, opredelyayuschie kul'turnye cennosti, s dorabotkoy i sistematizaciey uzhe suschestvuyuschih v EAES perechney etih ob'ektov. Dlya etogo obyazatel'nym yavlyaetsya soblyudenie principov yuridicheskoy tehniki: kratkost' zakonodatel'nyh definiciy, chetkost' formulirovok, nedopustimost' nesovpadeniya opredeleniy odnogo ponyatiya v raznyh normativnyh aktah v ramkah odnoy nacional'noy sistemy zakonodatel'stva. Vydvigaetsya predpolozhenie, chto s uchetom tehniko-yuridicheskih nyuansov opredeleniya kul'turnyh cennostey te iz nih, kotorye podpadayut pod ogranichitel'nyy rezhim peremescheniya cherez tamozhennuyu granicu, mozhno sgruppirovat' v edinom perechne, soglasovannom i utverzhdennom mezhgosudarstvennym aktom EAES vne ramok «Edinogo perechnya tovarov, k kotorym primenyayutsya mery netarifnogo regulirovaniya v torgovle s tret'imi stranami».
Nacional'noe dostoyanie kazhdogo gosudarstva, vklyuchaya kul'turnye cennosti, ohranyaetsya ego zakonodatel'stvom. Mezhdu tem suschestvuet razlichie v podhodah k opredeleniyu kul'turnyh cennostey v normativnyh aktah stran — uchastnic EAES, chto usugublyaetsya neodnoznachnost'yu tolkovaniya nekotoryh polozheniy mezhgosudarstvennyh aktov. Eto uvelichivaet risk uteri predmetov kul'turnogo naslediya i oslablyaet tamozhennyy kontrol' v hode peremescheniya kul'turnyh cennostey cherez tamozhennuyu granicu EAES. S pomosch'yu sravnitel'no-pravovogo i formal'no-yuridicheskogo metodov predprinyata popytka proanalizirovat' «kul'turnoe» zakonodatel'stvo vseh stran — uchastnic EAES v kontekste vyyavleniya osobennostey opredeleniya kul'turnyh cennostey, podpadayuschih pod ogranichitel'nyy pravovoy rezhim. Obrascheno vnimanie na otsutstvie unifikacii v zakonodatel'nom regulirovanii peremescheniya kul'turnyh cennostey cherez tamozhennuyu granicu EAES. Sformulirovan vyvod o neobhodimosti vnesti terminologicheskoe edinoobrazie v nacional'nye normativnye formulirovki, opredelyayuschie kul'turnye cennosti, s dorabotkoy i sistematizaciey uzhe suschestvuyuschih v EAES perechney etih ob'ektov. Dlya etogo obyazatel'nym yavlyaetsya soblyudenie principov yuridicheskoy tehniki: kratkost' zakonodatel'nyh definiciy, chetkost' formulirovok, nedopustimost' nesovpadeniya opredeleniy odnogo ponyatiya v raznyh normativnyh aktah v ramkah odnoy nacional'noy sistemy zakonodatel'stva. Vydvigaetsya predpolozhenie, chto s uchetom tehniko-yuridicheskih nyuansov opredeleniya kul'turnyh cennostey te iz nih, kotorye podpadayut pod ogranichitel'nyy rezhim peremescheniya cherez tamozhennuyu granicu, mozhno sgruppirovat' v edinom perechne, soglasovannom i utverzhdennom mezhgosudarstvennym aktom EAES vne ramok «Edinogo perechnya tovarov, k kotorym primenyayutsya mery netarifnogo regulirovaniya v torgovle s tret'imi stranami».
Keywords:
kul'turnye cennosti, Evraziyskiy ekonomicheskiy soyuz, principy yuridicheskoy tehniki, mery netarifnogo regulirovaniya.
kul'turnye cennosti, Evraziyskiy ekonomicheskiy soyuz, principy yuridicheskoy tehniki, mery netarifnogo regulirovaniya.
No data
1. No data
