Russian Federation
Article contains the analysis of modern approaches to quality management of subject training, and also gives the main mechanisms providing quality of graphic training of students in the Perm Polytechnic University. The work purpose is to present model of quality management of graphic preparation and to show process model of carrying out monitoring of the reached educational results. The adaptive model with negative feedback is offered as model of management of subject preparation. The process model of through monitoring of educational results of subject training promotes improvement of quality of training of the student since allows to trace deviations from the predicted intermediate results of education and to correct an educational trajectory of the student by means of negative feedback. The effective mechanisms providing quality of graphic preparation at university are given in article. Experience of its realization was repeatedly discussed on pages of the Internet edition of the QGP conferences, other editions and got approval of the geometric and graphic community of Russia and the neighboring countries. The annual Internet conferences which are carried out since 2010 initiated by the Perm national research polytechnic university and "Design, Graphics and Descriptive Geometry" chair are innovative and extremely effective mechanism of integration of interaction of teachers of the geometric — graphic disciplines. They are aimed at improvement of quality of graphic training of students of technical universities and promote permission of the collected problems of engineering education of Russia. This project showed the viability, gained fame and support in the environment of geometric and graphic community. The article is of interest to teachers of university chairs who teach disciplines in a competence-based format and solve a problem to optimize educational process, increasing quality of subject training at deficiency of a number of hours in the curriculum. We hope that the described experience of ensuring quality of graphic preparation will be useful to readers.
competence approach, subject teaching system, the system of quality management, procedures and management mechanisms, quality of subject teaching.
1. Aleksandrova E.P., Nosov K.G., Stolbova I.D. Geometricheskoe modelirovanie kak instrument povyshenija kachestva graficheskoj podgotovki studentov [Geometric Modeling as a Tool to Improve the Quality of Graphic Training of Students]. Otkrytoe obrazovanie [Open education]. 2014, I. 5 (106), pp. 20-27.
2. Anisimova M.A., Bljaherov I.S., Maslennikov A.V., Morzhov A.V. K voprosu o proektirovanii ocenochnyh sredstv sformirovannosti kompetencij [To the question of designing of estimation means for students’ professional competences]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. 2013, I. 4, pp. 106-112.
3. Bul´bovich R.V., Zajcev N.N., Stolbova I.D. Analiz kompetencij vypusknika vysshej shkoly v oblasti ajerokosmicheskoj tehniki [Analysis of graduates’ competences in airspace engineering]. Innovacii v obrazovanii [Innovation in Education]. 2010, I. 4, pp. 4-16.
4. Bojkov A. A. Ispol´zovanie komp´juternoj sistemy dlja metodicheskogo obespechenija graficheskih kursov [Computer means of graphic disciplines’ training courses support]. Geometrija i grafika [Geometry & Graphics]. V. 1, I. 2, pp. 52-54. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1273/791.
5. Volkova M.U. Egorycheva E. V. Graficheskaja gramotnost´ inzhenera kak sposob poluchenija fundamental´nyh professional´nyh znanij [Engineer´s Graphic Literacy as a Way of Fundamental Professional Knowledge Obtaining]. Geometrija i grafika [Geometry & Graphics]. V. 2, I. 1, pp. 53-57. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/3849
6. Gitman M.B., Danilov A.N., Stolbov V.Ju., Juzhakov A.A. Modeli setevogo vzaimodejstvija vuzov pri podgotovke kadrov vysshej kvalifikacii [Models of network interaction in higher education institutions when training post graduate students]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz [University Management: Practice and Analysis]. 2012, I. 3, pp. 69-73.
7. Gitman M.B., Petrov V.Ju., Stolbov V.Ju., Pahomov S.I. Ocenka kachestva podgotovki nauchnyh kadrov k innovacionnoj dejatel´nosti na osnove processnogo podhoda [The estimation of quality of the scientific shots preparation to innovative activity on the basis of the process approach]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz [University Management: Practice and Analysis]. 2011, I. 2. pp. 55-63.
8. GOST R ISO 9000-2008 Sistemy menedzhmenta kachestva. Osnovnye polozhenija i slovar´ [GOST R ISO 9000-2008 Quality Management System. Fundamentals and vocabulary]. Moscow, Standartinform Publ., 2009.
9. Karavaeva E. V., Bogoslovskij V. A., Haritonov D. V. Principy ocenivanija urovnja osvoenija kompetencij po obrazovatel´nym programmam VPO v sootvetstvii s trebovanijami FGOS novogo pokolenija [The principles of evaluation of the level of development of competences in educational programs of HPE in accordance with the requirements of the new generation of GEF]. Vestnik Cheljabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Herald of Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University]. 2009. I. 18. I. 12, pp. 155-162.
10. Kon E.L., Frejman V.I., Juzhakov A.A. Razrabotka i issledovanie podhodov k upravleniju, kontrolju i ocenivaniju kachestva realizacii kompetentnostno-orientirovannyh obrazovatel´nyh program [Design and Research of Approaches to the Management, Monitor, and Assessment of Quality of Implementing Competence-Based Study Programmes]. Nauka i obrazovanie: jelektronnoe nauchno-tehnicheskoe izdanie [Science & education: electronic publishing]. 2015, I. 3, pp. 356-372.
11. Korovkin M.V., Mogil´nickij S.B., Chuchalin A.I. Sistema menedzhmenta kachestva v vuze [The quality management system in high school]. Inzhenernoe obrazovanie [Engineering Education]. 2005, I. 3, pp. 62-71.
12. Lagunova M.V., Moshkova T.V., Tjurina V.A. K voprosu ob urovne gotovnosti studentov 1 kursa k osvoeniju geometrograficheskih disciplin v vuze [Analyse of first year students’ ability of cognition of geometric and graphic disciplines depending on their initial skills]. Mezhdunarodnaja internetkonferencija KGP-2015 [International Internet Conference QGP-2015]. Perm, PermGTU, 2015, pp. 236-242. 13. Lobov N.V., Stolbova I.D., Stolbov V.Ju., Danilov A.N. Kompetentnostnaya model´ vypusknika: opyt proektirovaniya [Competence model of graduate: experience in designing]. Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya [Higher education today]. 2013, I. 6, pp. 20-28.
13.
14. Matushkin N.N., Pahomov, Stolbova I.D. Formirovanie kompetencij vypusknika vuza na osnove processnogo podhoda [Formation of the competences of university graduates based on the process approach]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz [University Management: Practice and Analysis]. 2011, I. 1, pp. 58-63.
15. Matushkin N.N., Stolbova I.D. Model´ sistemy upravlenija podgotovkoj nauchnyh kadrov v oblasti tehniki i tehnologii k innovacionnoj dejatel´nosti [Model of System of Management of Scientific Staff Training for Innovative Activity in a Field of Techniques, Technology]. Innovacii v obrazovanii [Innovation in Education]. 2009, I. 5, pp. 4-15.
16. Minin M.G., Zaharova A.A., Saf´jannikov I.A., Vehter E.V. Organizacija processa podgotovki bakalavrov tehniki i tehnologii k proektno-konstruktorskoj dejatel´nosti [Оrganisation of engineering and technology bachelors training process for project and design activity at Tomsk Polytechnic University]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. 2013, I. 5, pp. 106-113.
17. Polupan K.L. Monitoring kachestva obrazovanija v vuze v uslovijah vnedrenija kompetentnostnoj modeli podgotovki specialistov [The monitoring of university education quality in the context of competence model of training]. Vestnik Baltijskogo federal´nogo universiteta im. I. Kanta [IKBFU´s Vestnik]. 2012, I. 11, pp 41-45.
18. Prokopenko S.A. Balansirovanie interesov prepodavatelej i povyshenie kachestva obuchenija v universitete [Finding balance between lecturer´´s interest and upgrading the quality of teaching at the univeristy]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz [University Management: Practice and Analysis]. 2015, I. 1, pp. 84-93.
19. Stolbova I.D. Aktual´nye problemy graficheskoj podgotovki studentov v tehnicheskih vuzah [Actual Problems of Graphic Training of Students at Technical High Educational Institutions]. Geometrija i grafika [Geometry & Graphics]. 2014, V. 2, I. 1, pp. 30-41.
20. Stolbova I.D., Aleksandrova E.P., Krajnova M.N. Modul´naya tekhnologiya upravleniya predmetnoy podgotovkoy studentov. [Modular control technology subject preparing student]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz [University Management: Practice and Analysis]. 2012, I. 5, pp. 88-95.
21. Stolbova I.D., Aleksandrova E.P., Kraynova M.N. Ob unifikatsii kompetentnostno-orientirovannogo predmetnogo obucheniya v usloviyakh FGOS VPO [On the harmonization of the competence-based learning in terms of the objective of the Federal State Educational Standard of the higher professional education]. Innovatsii v obrazovanii [Innovation in Education]. 2012, I. 12, pp. 85-98.
22. Stolbova I.D., Aleksandrova E.P., Krajnova M.N. Organizacija razrabotki rabochih programm discipliny pri urovnevoj graficheskoj podgotovke studentov [The organization of development of subject programs for layered graphic training]. Innovacii v obrazovanii [Innovation in Education]. 2014, I. 4, pp. 96-107.
23. Stolbova I.D. Vyyavlenie sostava aktual´nykh kompetentsiy graficheskoy podgotovki [Identification of relevant competencies graphic preparation]. Problemy kachestva graficheskoy podgotovki v usloviyakh perekhoda na obrazovatel´nye standarty novogo pokoleniya: Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoprakticheskoy internet-konferentsii [Problems of graphics quality training in the transition to a new generation of educational standards: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Internet Conference]. Perm´, Perm´ GTU Publ., 2010, pp. 14-21.
24. Stolbova I.D. Organizatsiya predmetnogo obucheniya: kompetentnostnyy podkhod [Organization of subject teaching: the competence approach]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. 2012, I. 7, pp. 10-20.
25. Stolbova I.D. Upravlenie kachestvom predmetnogo obucheniya na osnove kompetentnostnogo podkhoda [Quality management subject teaching competency-based approach]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz [University Management: Practice and Analysis]. 2011, I. 3, pp. 55-61.
26. Stolbova I.D., Stolbov O.V., Shahova A.B. Opyt provedenija internet-konferencij po problemam kachestva graficheskoj podgotovki kak primer mezhvuzovskoj kooperacii [Experience of Online Conferences on Problems of Graphic Training Quality as an Example of Interuniversity Cooperation]. Geometrija i grafika [Geometry & Graphics]. 2014, V. 2, I. 3, pp. 17-24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/6521.
27. Sufljaeva N. E. Sovremennye aspekty prepodavanija graficheskih disciplin v tehnicheskih vuzah [Modern aspects of teaching graphic disciplines at the Technical University]. Geometrija i grafika [Geometry & Graphics]. V. 2, I. 4, pp. 28-33. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/8294.
28. Filonenko L.A., Cherednichenko O.P. O problemah nesootvetstvija kompetencij, formiruemyh shkol´nym obrazovaniem, trebovanijam k graficheskoj podgotovke abiturientov tehnicheskih vuzov [About problems of inconsistency competences formed by school education, the requirements for graphic preparation matriculants technical university]. V Mezhdunarodnaja internet-konferencija KGP-2015 [V International Internet Conference QGP-2015]. Perm´, Perm´ GTU, 2015, pp. 356-361.
