Achieving technological sovereignty is a strategic priority, and the state implements a set of support measures, but their effectiveness requires comprehensive evaluation. Based on theoretical approaches to defining technological sovereignty and criteria for evaluating effectiveness, key characteristics of existing support measures are examined. Systemic problems are identified, including insufficient coherence of the regulatory framework and goal-setting, fragmentation of instruments, functional barriers to business access to support, and limited coverage of priority sectors. Factors reducing the overall effectiveness of state policy in this area are analyzed. The potential of systematically using public-private partnership (PPP) mechanisms to address complex technological development challenges is considered as a promising direction for improving the effectiveness of support measures. The need for further adaptation of support instruments and the development of comprehensive approaches to assessing their contribution to achieving technological sovereignty is indicated.
technological sovereignty, state support, effectiveness, support measures, barriers, structural adaptation of the economy, innovations, high-tech industries, public-private partnership
1. Ukaz Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 7 maya 2024 g. № 309 «O nacional'nyh celyah razvitiya Rossiyskoy Federacii na period do 2030 goda i na perspektivu do 2036 goda».
2. Otchet Schetnoy palaty RF ob analize rezul'tativnosti mer gospodderzhki proektov tehnologicheskogo suvereniteta za 2023-2024 gg. : utv. Kollegiey Schetnoy palaty RF 07.11.2024 g. – M., 2024. – 55 s.
3. Garbuzov A. M., Kirillova O. Yu., Gladysheva I. V. Sovershenstvovanie podhoda k upravleniyu merami gosudarstvennoy podderzhki predpriyatiy v hode realizacii promyshlennoy politiki // Nauchnyy rezul'tat. Tehnologii biznesa i servisa. – 2024. – T. 10. – №. 3. – S. 61-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18413/2408-9346-2024-10-3-0-5; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ORUZXP
4. Elistratov I. R. Analiz vliyaniya gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva na razvitie otechestvennoy medicinskoy promyshlennosti // Vestnik universiteta. – 2024. – №. 11. – S. 72-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2024-11-72-78; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/AQIATQ
5. Kovalev S. G. Tehnologicheskaya suverennost' Rossii v noveyshem mirovom poryadke // Filosofiya hozyaystva. – 2020. – №. 6. – S. 29-47. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RBJJHA
6. Korovin G. Rezul'tativnost' gosudarstvennoy podderzhki obrabatyvayuschey promyshlennosti v industrial'nyh regionah RF // Ekonomika regiona. – 2021. – T. 17. – №. 4. – S. 1256-1269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-4-15; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IPKTFR
7. Namadov V. D. Vozmozhnosti adaptacii zarubezhnogo opyta gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva v rossiyskoy ekonomike // Aktual'nye voprosy ekonomiki promyshlennosti: poisk i vybor resheniy : Sbornik materialov III Nacional'noy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, Moskva, 13 dekabrya 2023 goda. – Moskva: Obschestvo s ogranichennoy otvetstvennost'yu "Rusayns", 2024. – S. 201-207. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RHGTIB
8. Namadov V. D. Koncepciya «vstroennogo agentstva» kak variant resheniya problemy opredeleniya tehnologicheskogo suvereniteta v usloviyah krizisa globalizacii // Nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki. Ekonomika firmy. – 2024. – T. 13, № 3. – S. 34-39. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.12737/2306-627X-2024-13-3-34-39. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MUSMZZ
9. Namadov V. D. Opyt realizacii mehanizmov gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva v gosudarstvah - osnovatelyah BRIKS // Promyshlennost': ekonomika, upravlenie, tehnologii. – 2024. – T. 3, № 2(9). – S. 6-12. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IPRZAR
10. Namadov V. D. Realizaciya proektov GChP v sfere zdravoohraneniya v epohu COVID-19 // Samoupravlenie. – 2021. – № 3(125). – S. 465-468. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SKMNCF
11. Namadov V. D., Baurina S. B. Riski gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva v promyshlennosti // Ekonomicheskie nauki. – 2024. – № 239. – S. 132-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14451/1.239.132; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TIQTVP
12. Palash S. V., Eliseeva E. S. Effektivnost' mer gosudarstvennoy podderzhki predpriyatiy i ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost' promyshlennosti // Intellektual'naya inzhenernaya ekonomika i industriya 5.0 (INPROM). – 2023. – S. 545-547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18720/IEP/2023.1/150; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UXDMCN
13. Semenov A. V. Tehnologicheskiy suverenitet rossiyskoy promyshlennosti, osnovannyy na GChP: perspektivy i riski // Vektor ekonomiki. – 2024. – №. 4. – S. 94. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IGPVFC
14. Spicyna T. A., Margolina E. V. Problemy i perspektivy primeneniya mehanizma gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva v promyshlennosti // Ekonomicheskie sistemy. – 2023. – T. 16. – №. 3. – S. 163-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29030/2309-2076-2023-16-3-163-172; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XMFVXS
15. Faykov D. Yu., Baydarov D. Yu. Na puti k tehnologicheskomu suverenitetu: teoreticheskie podhody, praktika, predlozheniya // Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii. – 2023. – №. 1 (75). – S. 67-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2023-1-75-67-82; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UDJYGK
16. Fal'cman V. K. Tehnologicheskie suverenitety Rossii. Statisticheskie izmereniya // Sovremennaya Evropa. – 2018. – №. 3 (82). – S. 83-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15211/soveurope320188391; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XVYJNR
17. Abdul S. et al. Public-private partnerships in health sector innovation: Lessons from around the world // Magna Scientia Advanced Biology and Pharmacy. – 2024. – T. 12. – №. 1. – S. 045-059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/msabp.2024.12.1.0032; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/STQBXZ
18. Crespi F. et al. European technological sovereignty: an emerging framework for policy strategy // Intereconomics. – 2021. – T. 56. – №. 6. – S. 348-354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-021-1013-6; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PZRMRP
19. Edler J. et al. Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy. Defining rationales, ends and means // Research Policy. – 2023. – T. 52. – №. 6. – S. 104765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104765; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JFINLC
20. Filatova I. et al. Public-private partnership as a tool of sustainable development in the oil-refining sector: Russian case // Sustainability. – 2021. – T. 13. – №. 9. – S. 5153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095153; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZHHOVN
21. Grant P. Technological sovereignty: forgotten factor in the ‘hi-tech’razzamatazz // Prometheus. – 1983. – T. 1. – №. 2. – S. 239-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08109028308628930
22. March C., Schieferdecker I. Technological sovereignty as ability, not autarky // International Studies Review. – 2023. – T. 25. – №. 2. – S. viad012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viad012
23. Pianezzi D., Mori Y., Uddin S. Public–private partnership in a smart city: A curious case in Japan // International Review of Administrative Sciences. – 2023. – T. 89. – №. 3. – S. 632-647. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211051839
24. Piechucka J., Saurí-Romero L., Smulders B. Industrial policies, competition, and efficiency: The need for state aid control // Journal of Competition Law & Economics. – 2023. – T. 19. – №. 4. – S. 503-526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhad014
25. Werner P., Verouden V. (ed.). EU state aid control: Law and economics. – Kluwer Law International BV, 2025.
