1. Baker S. Sustainable development as symbolic commitment: Declaratory politics and the seductive appeal ofecological modernisation in the European Union // Environmental Politics. 2007. No. 16. P. 297-317.
2. Bamberg S. & Möser G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psychosocial determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14-25.
3. Bamberg S., Möser G. Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behavior // Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2007. No. 27. P. 14-25.
4. Batel S., Castro P. A social representations approach to the communication between different spheres: An analysis of the impact of two discursive formats // Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 2009. No. 39. P. 415-433.
5. Bauer M., Gaskell G. (Eds.) Biotechnology - the making of a global controversy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
6. Beck U. World at risk. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2009.
7. Beck-Gernshein E. Health and responsibility: From social change to technological change and vice versa / In B. Adam, U. Beck, J. Van Loon (Eds.). The risk society and beyond: Cri-tical issues for social theory. London: Sage, 2000. P. 123-135.
8. Bonaiuto M., Carrus G., Martorella H., Bonnes M. Local identity processes and environmental attitudes in land use changes: The case of natural protected areas // Journal of Economic Psychology. 2002. No. 23. P. 631-653.
9. Buijs A. Public natures: Social representations of nature and local practices. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Alterra, 2009.
10. Carrus G., Bonaiuto M., Bonnes M. Environmental concern, regional identity, and support for protected areas in Italy // Environment and Behavior. 2005. No. 37. P. 237-257.
11. Carrus G., Cini F., Bonaiuto M., Mauro A. Local mass media communication and environmental disputes: An analysis of press communication on the designation of the Tuscan Archipelago National Park in Italy // Society and Natural Resources. 2009. No. 22. P. 607-624.
12. Castro P. Applying social psychology to the study of environmental concern and environmental worldviews: Some contributions from social representations approach // Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 2006. No. 16. P. 247-266.
13. Castro P. Legal Innovation for Social Change: Exploring Change and Resistance to Different Types of Sustainability Laws // Political Psychology. 2012. No. 1. P. 105-121.
14. Castro P., Batel S. Social representation, change and resistance: On the difficulties of generalizing new norms // Culture & Psychology. 2008. No. 14. P. 477-499.
15. Castro P., Mouro C. Socio-psychological processes in dealing with change in the community: Insights gained from biodiversity conservation // American Journal of Community Psychology. 2011. No. 47. P. 362-373.
16. Cialdini R.B., Trost M.R. Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance / In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, G. Lindzey (Eds.). The handbook of social psychology, 2. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998. P. 151-192.
17. Corral-Verdugo V., Frías-Armenta M. Personal normative beliefs, antisocial behaviour and residential water conservation // Environment & Behavior. 2006. No. 38. P. 406-421.
18. Devine-Wright P., Howes Y. Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study // Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2010. No. 30. P. 271-280.
19. Farr R.M. From collective to social representations: Aller et retour. Culture & Psychology. 1998. No. 4. P. 275-296.
20. Foucault M. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books, 1980.
21. Gonçalves M.E. Implementation of EIA directives in Portugal: How changes in civic culture are challenging political and administrative practice // Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2002. No. 22. P. 249-269.
22. Hernandez B., Martín A. M., Ruiz C., Hidalgo M.C. The role of place identity and place attachment in breaking environmental protection laws // Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2010. No. 30. P. 281-288.
23. Hiedanpää J. (2005). The edges of conflict and consensus: Acase for creativity in regional forest policy in Southwest Finland. Ecological Economics, 55, 485-498.
24. Hiedanpää J. The edges of conflict and consensus:Acase for creativity in regional forest policy in Southwest Finland // Ecological Economics. 2005. No. 55. P. 485-498.
25. Hovardas T., Stamous G. Structural and narrative reconstruction of rural residents’ representations of “nature”, “wildlife,” and “landscape” // Biodiversity & Conservation. 2006. No. 15. P. 1745-70.
26. Joule R.V., Girandola F., Bernard F. How can people be induced to willingly change their behavior? The path from persuasive communication to binding communication // Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2007. No. 1. P. 493-505.
27. Jovchelovitch S. Knowledge in context: Representations, community and culture. London: Routledge, 2007.
28. Jovchelovitch S., Gervais M.-C. Social representations of health and illness: The case of the Chinese community in England // Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology. 1999. No. 9. P. 247-260.
29. Marková I. The epistemological significance of the theory of social representations // Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 2008. No. 38. P. 461-487.
30. Moscovici S. La psychanalyse, son image et son public. Paris: PUF, 1961/1976.
31. Moscovici S. On social representations. In J.P. Forgas (Ed.), Social cognition: Perspectives on everyday understanding. London: Academic Press, 1981. P. 181-209.
32. Mouro C., Castro P. Local communities responding to ecological challenges - A psycho-social approach to the Natura 2000 network // Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 2010. No. 20. P. 139-155.
33. New York City Council; Retrieved from: http://council.nyc.gov/html/releases/recycling_4_10_10.shtml
34. Orfali B. Extreme right movements: Why do they re-emerge? Why are they accepted? // Theory & Psychology. 2006. No. 16. P. 715-736.
35. Rayens M.K., Hahn E.J., Langley R.E., Hedgecock S., Butler K.M., Greathouse-Maggio L. Public opinion and smoke-free laws // Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice. 2007. No. 8. P. 262-270.
36. Rosa H., Silva J. From environmental ethics to nature conservation policy: Natura 2000 and the burden of proof // Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics. 2005. No. 18. P. 107-130.
37. Rutherford P. The entry of life into history / In E. Darier (Ed.). Discourses of the environment. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999. P. 95-118.
38. Simon B., Oakes P. Beyond dependence: An identity approach to social power and domination // Human Relations. 2006. No. 59. P. 105-139.
39. Spini D., Doise W. Organizing principles of involvement in human rights and their social anchoring in value priorities // European Journal of Social Psychology. 1998. No. 28. P. 603-622.
40. Spini D., Doise W. Universal human rights and duties as normative social representations / In N.J. Finkel & F. Moghaddam (Eds.). The psychology of human rights and duties: Empirical contributions and normative commentaries. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2005. P. 21-48.
41. Stern P. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior // Journal of Social Issues. 2000. No. 56. P. 407-424.
42. Stoll-Kleemann S. Barriers to nature conservation in Germany: A model explaining opposition to protected areas // Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2001. No. 21. P. 369-385.
43. Uzzell D., Rathzel N. Transforming environmental psychology // Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2009. No. 29. P. 340-350.
44. Wagner W., Duveen G., Verma J., Themel M. The modernization of tradition: thinking about madness in Patna, India // Culture & Psychology. 1999. No. 5. P. 413-445.