Развитие горнодобывающей промышленно сти в Монголии характеризуется высоким уровнем потребления энергии и загрязнением, которые наносят вред окружающей среде, что приводит к экологическому стрессу. В Монголии он увеличился до такой степени, что стал влиять на экономическую и социальную устойчивость страны. Цель работы — уточнение значения корпоративной практики социальной ответственности с точки зрения защиты окружающей среды Монголии и анализ результатов исследований, касающихся восприятия студентами МВА по экологическим видам деятельности монгольских компаний. Путем опроса были получены первичные данные, при использовании которые выявлено, что это исследование анализирует корпоративные мероприятия социальной ответственности монгольских компаний в следующих областях: экологическая политика и планирование, обсуждение, поддержка администрацией решения экологических проблем, экологический контроль с учетом специфики отрасли, барьеры на пути осуществления защиты окружающей среды и участия заинтересованных сторон, будущие тенденции.
корпоративная социальная ответственность, защита окружающей среды, экологические практики, экологический менеджмент.
INTRODUCTION
CSR is defined as business engaging in voluntary social and environmental endeavors that exceed the existing legal requirements (Mc Williams, Siegel & Wright, 2006; Van Marrewijk, 2003). These endeavors include charity/philanthropy, environmental activism or any organizational activity related to the uplifting of social or environmental conditions. CSR is a broad concept which basically asks: What is the role of business in society? How do organizations fulfill their responsibilities to their employees and society? And how/why business publicly discloses CSR information? (Carroll 2008; Grane, MC Willams, Matten, Moon, &Siegal, 2008; Handy 2002). But the researchers still do not share a common definition or core of set principles for CSR (Aaronson 2003, Carroll 1999; Dahlsrud 2008), because of its vagueness and subjectivity (Grane et al., 2008). With global changes in the way the role of business is perceived, CSR has evolved to become an international idea (Hamann, 2003) and include both environmental and non-environmental issues (e.g. human rights (Welford, 2002)). In addition to social justice and community welfare (Crowther, 2004), today’s businesses are expected to contribute to the protection of the natural environment.As environmental sustainability became an important concern for organizations and environmental disclosure became a stakeholder requirement, organizations tried to institutionalize environmental concerns through policies, procedures, and systems (Jones et al., 1998; Russo and Fouts, 1997).
1. Aaronson, S.A. (2003). Corporate responsibility in the global village: The British role model and the American laggard Business &Society Review, 108(3), 309-338. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/14678594.00167
2. Al-Tuwaijri S, Christensen TE, Hughes II KE. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economicperformance: a simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society 29: 447-471.
3. Anita Jose Shang-Mei Lee (2007). Environmental Reporting of Global Corporations: A Content Analysis based on Website Disclosures Journal of Business Ethics 72:307-321
4. Boli, J. and D. Hartsuiker: (2001), World culture and Transnational Corporations: Sketch of a Project. International Conference on Effects of and Responses to Globalization, Istanbul.
5. Bowen, H.R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman (Harper, New York).
6. Carroll, A.B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268-295. doi:101177/000765039903800303
7. Carroll, A.B. (2008). A history of corporate social responsibility: Concepts and practices. In A. McWillians, D.Matten, J. Moon & D. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 19-46). Oxford, UK.: Oxford University. 8. Christensen, L. J., E. Pierce, L. P. Hartman,W.M.Hoffman and J. Carrier: (2007), ‘Ethics, CSR, and Sustainability Education in the Financial TimesTop 50 Global Business Schools: Baseline Data and FutureResearch Directions’, Journal of Business Ethics 73(4), 347-368. doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9211-5.
8. Cornelius, N.J. Wallace and R. Tassabehji: (2007), ‘Na Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Identity And Ethics Teaching in Business Schools’, Journal of Business Ethics 76(1), 117-135. doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/10551-006-9271-6.
9. Cormier D., Magnan M. (1999). Corporate environmental disclosure strategies: determinants, costs and benefits. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 14(3): 429-451.
10. Cormier D., Magnan M. (2003). Environmental reporting management: a European perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 22: 43- 62.
11. Crowther D. (2004).Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility.Ashgate Publishing.
12. Daft, R. (1995), Understanding Management (The Dryden Press, Orlando, FL).
13. Dahlsrud, A.: (2006), ‘How Corporate Social Responsibility is Defined: An Analysis of 37 Definitions’, Corporate Social-Responsibility and Environmental Management 15(1), 1-13. doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/csr.132.
14. Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. CSR and Environmental Management, 15 (1), 1-13. do:https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.132
15. Deegan, C. and B. Gordon: (1996), A Study of the Environmental Disclosure Policies of Australian Corporations, Accounting and Business Research 26(3), 187-199.
16. Grane, A., Siegal, D., Moon, J., Matten, D., Mcwillams, A. (2008): The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility, 1st ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford Handbooks Series.
17. Gray R, Kouhy R, Lavers S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UKdisclosure. Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal 8(2): 47- 77.
18. Guthrie J, Parker L. (1989). Corporate social reporting: a rebuttal of legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research 19(76): 343-352.
19. Ingram R, Frazier K.B. (1980). Environmental performance and corporate disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research 18: 612-622.
20. Guthrie, J.E. and L.D. Parker: (1990), Corporate Social Disclosure Practice: A Comparative InternationalAnalysis, Advances in Public Interest Accounting 3, 159-176.
21. Hamann R. (2003). Mining companies’ role in sustainable development: the ‘why’ and ‘how’ of corporate social responsibility from a business perspective. Development South Africa 20(2): 237-254.
22. Handy, C. (2002). What’s a business for Harward Business Review, 80 (12), 49-56. Retrived from http://www.hbr.org
23. Holsti, O.R. (1969), Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).
24. IMF (2006). World economic outlook: Financial systems and economic cycles. Brussels, Belfium: International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2006/02/
25. Jones, K., T. Alabaster and J. Walton: (1998), Virtual Environments for Environmental Reporting, GreenerManagement International 21, 121-137.
26. Kolk, A. (2003), Trends in Sustainability Reporting by the Fortune Global 250, Business Strategy and the Environment 12, 279-291.
27. KPMG: 1999, KPMG International Survey of Environmental Reporting 1999 (KPMG Environmental Consulting, DeMeern, The Netherlands).
28. KPMG: 2002, KPMG International Survey of Environmental Reporting 2002 (KPMG Environmental Consulting, DeMeern, The Netherlands).
29. LopinKuo, Chin-Chen Yeh and Hui - Cheng Yu, (2012), Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Mgmt. 19, 273-287. Published online 1 July 2011 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.274
30. Mc Williams, Siegel & Wright, (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1-18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j:.1467-6486.2006.00580.x
31. Meek, G. and C. Roberts: (1995), Factors Influencing Voluntary Annual Report Disclosures by U.S., U.K., and Continental European Multinational Corporations, Journal of International Business Studies 20(3), 555-572.
32. Morhardt, J., S. Baird and K. Freeman: (2002), Scoring Corporate Environmental and Sustainability Reports Using GRI 2000, ISO 14031 and Other Criteria, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management9, 215-233.
33. Nieminen, T. and J. Niskanen: (2001), The Objectivity of Corporate Environmental Reporting: A Study of Finnish Listed Firms’ Environmental Disclosures, Business Strategy and the Environment 10(1), 29-37.
34. Patten DM. (1992). Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill. Accounting, Organizations and Society 17(5): 471-475.
35. Peck, P. and K. Sinding: (2003), Environmental and Social Disclosure and Data Richness in the Mining Industry,Business Strategy and the Environment 12, 131-146.
36. Robert W. Kolodinsky, Timothy M. Madden, Daniel S. Zisk and Eric T. Henkel: (2010), Attitudes About Corporate Social Responsibility: Business Student Predictors Journal of Business Ethics 91:167-18. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0075-3
37. Russo, M.V. and P. A. Fouts: (1997), A Resource-Based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performanceand Profitability, Academy of Management Journal 40(3),534-559.
38. UNDP. (2006). Beyond scarcity: Power, poverty and the global water crisis. Brussels, Belgium: United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved from http:/www.worldwatercouncil.org/fileadmin/wma/documents/Analysis_HDR_2006.pdf
39. Van Marrewijk, (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44 (2/3), 95-105. doi: 101023/A:1023331212247
40. Visser W (2008) Corporate Social Responsibility in developing countries. In a Grane, MC Willams, D. Matten, J. Moon, &D. Siegal (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp.473-479). Oxford, UK.: Oxford University.
41. Welford R. (2002). Globalization, corporate social responsibility and human rights. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 1: 1-7.
42. Wiseman J. (1982). An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society 7(1): 53-63.
43. World Bank (2006). World development report 2007: Development and the next generation (35999). Washington: D.C. World Bank doi:https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-6541-0
44. WRI. (2005). World Resources 2005: The wealth of the poor: Managing ecosystems to fight poverty. Washington: D.C.: World Resources (WRI). Retrieved from http://pdf.wri.org/wrr05_lores.pdf
45. Zeghal D., Ahmed S. (1990). Comparison of social responsibility information disclosure media by Canadian firms. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal 3(1): 38-53.
