On the Question of the Relevance of the Philosophical-Anthropological Paradigm in Education

Elena Viktoruk; A. S. Chernyaeva; A. Myshkovskaya

doi:10.12737/2306-1731-2024-12-4-3-7

UDC 37.01

ON THE QUESTION OF THE RELEVANCE OF THE PHILOSOPHICAL-ANTHROPOLOGICAL PARADIGM IN EDUCATION On the Question of the Relevance of the Philosophical-Anthropological Paradigm in Education

АА Аа

Published in Scientific Research and Development. Socio-Humanitarian Research and Technology · Volume 12, Issue 4 · Pages 3–7 · Rubric: Strategic issues of education development

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/2306-1731-2024-12-4-3-7

Received: 11.01.2024 Accepted: 24.01.2024 Published: 24.01.2024

Authors

Elena Viktoruk

A. S. Chernyaeva

A. Myshkovskaya

Elena Viktoruk

Academic degree: doctor of philosophical sciences

Science rang: professor

Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after VP Astafyev Professor · Department of Philosophy, Economics and Law · Krasnoyarsk

A. S. Chernyaeva

Academic degree: candidate of philosophical sciences

Science rang: docent

Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology Associate Professor · Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences · Russian Federation

A. Myshkovskaya

Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after VP Astafyev Postgraduate · Department of Philosophy, Economics and Law · Krasnoyarsk

ABSTRACT

Social, cultural and technological changes necessitate the search for new paradigms in education. One solution may be associated with an anthropological approach that integrates philosophical, psychological and educational anthropology. The anthropological approach most fully reveals the essence of education as a phenomenon associated with human. The authors consider the problem of identifying educational technologies that will provide solutions to educational problems in a changing reality. It was found in the research that the pedagogical ideas that have developed in anthropological teachings reveal the desired image of a person and the methods of its formation. Thus, the anthropological approach in education demonstrates its effectiveness, since it allows us to consider a person as a sociocultural subject, whose behavior and development are determined by interaction with other people and the social environment. The analysis of anthropological views made it possible to identify two positions: the first is based on the ideas of uniqueness and self-creation of the individual, the subject-subject model of interaction, dialogue forms of communication, the second shifts the emphasis to the environment in which the formation and cultivation of the individual by society occurs. Analysis of approaches and concepts allows us to state the dynamics of the anthropological approach itself and the coexistence of various programs within the framework of approaches united conceptually.

KEYWORDS

anthropological approach, educational technologies, subject-subject interaction, network learning, education

Text

Text (PDF)

Read Download

1. Bakhtin M. M. Towards the methodology of the humanities Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. 2-nd ed. M.: Iskysstvo, 1986. Pp. 381-393. (in Russian)

2. Buber M. I and You. M.: Visshaja shkola, 1993. 175 p. (in Russian)

3. Victoruk E.N., Chernyaeva A.S. Features of the pedagogical experiment (by the example of the postgraduate seminar-workshop) // Nauchnije issledovanija i razrabotki. Socialno-gumanitarnije issledovanija i tehnologii. V. 11. № 3. 2022. Pp. 14-19. https://doi.org/10.12737/2306-1731-2022-11-3-14-19 (in Russian) EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ABNKKV

4. Geertz C. The Interpretation of Cultures. M.: Rossijskaja politicheskaja enciklopedija (ROSSPEN), 2004. 560 p. (in Russian) EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QOCQVP

5. Goncharova N.A. Philosophical analysis of the problem of the relationship between individual and collective in personal development. Nauchnij dialog. 2018. №5. Pp. 113-124. (in Russian)

6. Mineev V.V., Artemjeva S.I., Popkova N.A. The Educational Process as a Space for Understanding Global Challenges: A Socio-Philosophical Analysis. Nauchnije issledovanija i razrabotki. Socialno-gumanitarnije issledovanija i tehnologii. V.10. № 3. 2021. Pp. 23-28. https://doi.org/10.12737/2306-1731-2021-10-3-23-28 (in Russian) EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QQDXEU

7. Foucault M. Archeology of knowledge. SPb.: PC «Gumanitarnaja Akademija», Universitetskaja kniga, 2004. 416 p.

8. Heidegger M. Being and time. Har’kov: «Folio», 2003. 503 p. (in Russian)

9. Horkheimer M., Adorno T. Dialectic of Enlightenment M.-SPb.: Medium, Uventa, 1997. 312 p. (in Russian)

10. Horn G. Karl Jaspers as a philosopher of education. K. Jaspers. Idea of the university. Minsk: BGU, 2006. Pp. 6-30. (in Russian)

11. Shvidchenko A.V. Interaction with the world and interaction with people as factors of personal development. Philosophija obrazovanija. 2018. №2. Pp. 72-78. (in Russian)

12. Jaspers K. Idea of the university. Minsk: BGU, 2006. 159 p. (in Russian)

13. Delors, J., & Shikaki, K. Education, knowledge, and learning: The challenge for sustainable development. UNESCO https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000191442

14. Díaz-García, I., Almerich, G., Suárez-Rodríguez, J. M., & Orellana, N. (2023). University students’ competences in ICT: A view from the education domain. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 106-124. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6820

15. López-Aguilar, D., Álvarez-Pérez, P.R., González-Ramos, J.A., & Garcés-Delgado, Y. (2023). The development of resilient behaviours in the fight against university academic dropout. Educación XX1, 26.(2), 91-116. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.35891

PDF Text JATS XML

Otvetstvennyy sekretar'

Svetlana I. Artemyeva

vet-7@mail.ru

Vypuskayuschiy redaktor

Dar'ya Sklyankina

501@infra-m.ru

3375

downloads

GOST

Viktoruk E. N., Chernyaeva A. S., Myshkovskaya A. I. On the Question of the Relevance of the Philosophical-Anthropological Paradigm in Education // Scientific Research and Development. Socio-Humanitarian Research and Technology. 2024. no. 4. pp. 3-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/2306-1731-2024-12-4-3-7. (Date of access 24.09.2026).

MLA

Elena Viktoruk, Chernyaeva A. S., Myshkovskaya A. I.. "On the Question of the Relevance of the Philosophical-Anthropological Paradigm in Education." Scientific Research and Development. Socio-Humanitarian Research and Technology 12.4 (2024): 3-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/2306-1731-2024-12-4-3-7.

APA

Viktoruk E. N., Chernyaeva A. S., Myshkovskaya A. I. (2024). On the Question of the Relevance of the Philosophical-Anthropological Paradigm in Education. Scientific Research and Development. Socio-Humanitarian Research and Technology, 12(4), 3-7. https://doi.org/10.12737/2306-1731-2024-12-4-3-7

Chicago

Elena Viktoruk, Chernyaeva A. S., Myshkovskaya A. I.. "On the Question of the Relevance of the Philosophical-Anthropological Paradigm in Education." Scientific Research and Development. Socio-Humanitarian Research and Technology 12, no. 4 (2024): 3-7. https://doi.org/10.12737/2306-1731-2024-12-4-3-7.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = Viktoruk E. N., Chernyaeva A. S., Myshkovskaya A. I. | title = On the Question of the Relevance of the Philosophical-Anthropological Paradigm in Education | journal = Scientific Research and Development. Socio-Humanitarian Research and Technology | year = 2024 | volume = 12 | issue = 4 | pages = 3-7 | doi = 10.12737/2306-1731-2024-12-4-3-7 }}

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

ON THE QUESTION OF THE RELEVANCE OF THE PHILOSOPHICAL-ANTHROPOLOGICAL PARADIGM IN EDUCATION On the Question of the Relevance of the Philosophical-Anthropological Paradigm in Education

Confirmation