1. Istomin S.V., Mamzurin E.V. Podhody k gigienicheskomu normirovaniyu elektromagnitnyh izluchenij v Rossijskoj Federacii i za rubezhom [Approaches to hygienic regulation of electromagnetic radiation in the Russian Federation and abroad]. Ohrana i ekonomika truda [Labor protection and economics]. I. 2(11), 2013, pp. 10-12. (in Russian).

2. Tihonov M.N., Dovgusha V.V., Dovgusha L.V. Mekhanizm vliyaniya estestvennyh i tekhnogennyh elektromagnitnyh polej na bezopasnost' zhiznedeyatel'nosti [The mechanism of influence of natural and man-made electromagnetic fields on life safety]. Ekologicheskaya ekspertiza [Ecological expertise]. 2013, I. 6, pp. 48-65. (in Russian).

3. Ponnle Akinlolu, Adedeji Kazeem Assessment of Human Exposure to Magnetic Field from Overhead High Voltage Transmission Lines in a City in South Western Nigeria // American Journ. of Engineering Research. 2015. Vol. 4, issue 5. Pp. 154-162.

4. Schwan H.P. Nonthermal cellular effects of electromagnetic fields: AC - field induced ponderomotoric forces // British Journal of Cancer. 2009. Vol. 45. P. 220-224.

5. Zannella S. Biological effects of magnetic fields // CAS - CERN Accelerator School : Measurement and Alignment of Accelerator and Detector Magnets, Anacapri, Italy, 11 - 17 Apr 1997, pp.375-386. (CERN-1998-005). DOIhttps://doi.org/10.5170/CERN-1998-005.375. https://cds.cern.ch/record/1246526/files/p375.pdf

6. O sostoyanii sanitarno-epidemiologicheskogo blagopoluchiya naseleniya v Rossijskoj Federacii v 2017 godu: Gosudarstvennyj doklad [On the state of sanitary and epidemiological well-being of the population in the Russian Federation in 2017: State report]. Moscow: Federal'naya sluzhba po nadzoru v sfere zashchity prav potrebitelej i blagopoluchiya cheloveka Publ., 2018. 268 p. (in Russian).

7. Sturman V.I. Elektromagnitnye polya promyshlennogo diapazona chastot v usloviyah gorodskoj sredy kak ob"ekt ekologo-geograficheskogo issledovaniya [Electromagnetic fields of the industrial frequency range in the urban environment as an object of ecological and geographical research]. Geografiya i prirodnye resursy [Geography and natural resources]. 2019, I. 1, pp. 21-28. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21782/GIPR0206-1619-2019-1(21-28). (in Russian).

8. Sturman V.I., Panihidnikov S.A. Geoekologicheskie aspekty obespecheniya elektromagnitnoj bezopasnosti naseleniya v usloviyah gorodskoj sredy (na primere Sankt-Peterburga) [Geoecological aspects of ensuring the electromagnetic safety of the population in the urban environment (on the example of St. Petersburg)]. Bezopasnost' v tekhnosfere [Safety in the technosphere]. I. 2, 2017, pp. 28-35. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/article_598d76fcb70805.40354351. (in Russian).

9. Opinion on Possible effects of Electromagnetic Fields (EMF), Radio Frequency Fields (RF) and Microwave Radiation on human health Expressed at the 27th CSTEE plenary meeting Brussels, 30 October 2001 // http: // ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/ committees/sct/documents/out128_en.pdf [accessed 23 October 2019].

10. ICNIRP, “Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Time-varying Electric and Magnetic Fields (1 Hz - 100 kHz)”, Health Physics, Vol. 99, No. 6, 2010. Pp. 818-836.

11. Directive 2004/40/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, “The Minimum Health and Safety Requirements Regarding the Exposure of Workers to the Risks Arising from Physical Agents (Electromagnetic Fields)” Official Journal of the European Union, L184, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2004. Pp.1-9.

12. National precautionary policies on magnetic fields from power lines in Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. RIVM Report 2017-0118. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.21945/RIVM-2017-0118. Pp. 56.