1. Andreeva N.V., Rozhdestvenskaya L.V., Yarmakhov B.B. Shag shkoly v smeshannoe obuchenie [Step of the school in mixed education]. Moscow, Buki Vedi Publ. 2016.
2. Efremov K. Trud i deti - novye otnosheniya [Labor and children - a new relationship]. Vospitatel’naya rabota v shkole [Educational work in school]. 2007, I. 6, pp. 25-30.
3. Itogi proekta «Aprobatsiya kompleksnogo elektronnogo obrazovatel’nogo produkta «Mobil’naya Distantsionnaya Shkola» [Results of the project “Approbation of a comprehensive electronic educational product”]. Obrazovatel’nyy resurs «Mobil’naya elektronnaya shkola» [Mobile Distance School “. Educational resource «Mobile e-school»]. Available at: http://media.wix.com/ugd/c87fc5_3236328418364103a5b6d260336f9627.pdf
4. Karpacheva K.V., Dem’yanenko N.V. Ispol’zovanie smeshannogo obucheniya v protsesse obucheniya professional’nomu inostrannomu yazyku studentov inzhenernogo profi lya [The use of mixed instruction in the process of teaching a professional foreign language of engineering students]. Molodoy uchenyy [The young scientist]. 2015, I. 13, pp. 644-646.
5. Korchazhkina O.M. Soderzhanie i praktika primeneniya metapredmetnogo podkhoda k smeshannomu obucheniyu [The content and practice of applying a meta-subject approach to mixed learning]. Noginsk, ANALITIKA RODIS Publ., 2017.
6. Sobkin V.S. Transformatsiya tseley i motivatsii ucheby shkol’nikov [Transformation of the goals and motivation of schoolchildren’s learning]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya []. Moscow, 2006, I. 8, pp. 106-115.
7. Titova L.N. Professional’no-orientirovannaya podgotovka budushchikh uchiteley-fi lologov k primeneniyu informatsionnykh tekhnologiy i komp’yuternykh sredstv obucheniya v shkole. Kand. Diss [Professional-oriented training of future teachers of philology for the application of information technology and computer-based learning in the school. Cand. Diss]. Ufa, LN Titova Publ., 2009.
8. Fandey V.A. Smeshannoe obuchenie: sovremennoe sostoyanie i klassifi katsiya modeley smeshannogo obucheniya [Mixed training: the current state and classifi cation of models of mixed learning]. Informatizatsiya obrazovaniya i nauki [Informatization of education and science]. 2011, I. 12, pp. 115-125.
9. Fandey V.A. Teoretiko-pragmaticheskie osnovy ispol’zovaniya formy smeshannogo obucheniya inostrannomu (angliyskomu) yazyku v yazykovom vuze. Kand. Diss [Theoretical and pragmatic basics of using the form of mixed instruction in a foreign language (English) in a language university. Cand. Diss]. Moscow, 2012.
10. Federal’nyy gosudarstvennyy obrazovatel’nyy standart srednego (polnogo) obshchego obrazovaniya (utverzhden prikazom Minobrnauki Rossii ot 17 maya 2012 g. № 413) [Federal state educational standard of secondary (complete) general education (approved by the order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia on May 17, 2012 № 413)].
11. Tsaregorodtseva S.V. Rossii nachali ispol’zovat’ tekhnologiyu smeshannogo obucheniya [Russia began to use the technology of mixed education]. Nezavisimoe pedagogicheskoe izdanie «Uchitel’skaya gazeta» [Independent pedagogical publication “Teacher’s newspaper”]. Available at: http://www.ug.ru/article/626. (accessed 10 December 2017).
12. Bonk C. J., Graham C. R. The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. - John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
13. Bonk C. J. et al. Learning from focus groups: An examination of blended learning //International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education. - 2002. - V. 17. - I. 3. - S. 97-118.
14. Cooney M.H., Gupton P., O’Laughlin M. Blurring the lines of play and work to create blended classroom learning experiences //Early Childhood Education Journal. - 2000. - V. 27. - I. 3. - S. 165-171.
15. Graham C.R. Blended learning models //Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Second Edition. - IGI Global, 2009. - S.375-382.
16. Güzer B., Caner H. The past, present and future of blended learning: an in depth analysis of literature // Procedia-social and behavioral sciences. - 2014. - V. 116. - S. 4596-4603.
17. Horn M.B., Staker H. The rise of K-12 blended learning // Innosight institute. - 2011. - V. 5.
18. Mackey K. Proof points: Blended learning success in school districts. Educational website «Christensen institute» - https://www.christenseninstitute.org/ (Date of reference: 12.12.2017)
19. Mackey K. Proof Points: Blended learning success in school districts. District of Columbia public schools, Washington, D.C. Educational website «Christensen institute» - https://www.christenseninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/DCPS.pdf (Date of reference: 12.12.2017)
20. Mackey K. Proof Points: Blended learning success in school districts. Enlarged city school district of Middletown, New York. Educational website «Christensen institute» - https://www.christenseninstitute.org/ wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Enlarged-City-School-District-of-Middletown.pdf (Date of reference: 12.12.2017)
21. Mackey K. Proof Points: Blended learning success in school districts. Hamilton county community unit school district 10 McLeansboro, Illinois.Educational website «Christensen institute» - https://www.christenseninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Hamilton-County-Community-Unit-School-District-10.pdf (Date of reference: 12.12.2017)
22. Staker H., Horn M.B. Classifying K-12 blended learning //Innosight Institute. - 2012.
23. Stewart J.M. A blended e-learning approach to intercultural training //Industrial and Commercial Training. - 2002. - V. 34. - I. 7. - Pp. 269-271.
24. Valiathan P. Blended learning models //Learning circuits. - 2002. - V. 3. - I. 8. - Pp. 50-59.
