Polyfunctionality of Justice: Reality or Legal Reality Interpretation?

Pyetr Syerkov

doi:10.12737/22735

POLYFUNCTIONALITY OF JUSTICE: REALITY OR LEGAL REALITY INTERPRETATION? Polyfunctionality of Justice: Reality or Legal Reality Interpretation?

АА Аа

Published in Journal of Russian Law · Volume 4, Issue 12 · Pages 0–0 · Rubric: Judicial, Human Rights and Law Enforcement Activities

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/22735

Received: 18.11.2016 Accepted: 18.11.2016 Published: 18.11.2016 Language of publication: RUS

Authors

Pyetr Syerkov

ABSTRACT

In the article contains the analysis of such fundamental concepts as the judicial system and legal proceedings, which are the elements of justice as a whole. The article consists of three parts, which are containing the deductive analysis of the institutional structure of justice. In the first part of present article the interaction of the institutions of the judicial system and legal proceedings, the dynamics of institutional and functional changes, as well as evaluation of these changes were disclosed. Further the author examines every aspect of justice. Thus, in the second part of the paper the judiciary, as constitutional guarantees of fair justice, were studied. Also the judicial system and its components were analyzed by the author. The third part of the article focuses on the second element of justice — judicial proceedings. In this part of the work the author discloses the two components of judicial proceedings: judicial proceedings as a consequence of the conflict and judicial proceedings as a material expression of fairness in a particular conflict. The author defines the definition of the term "judicial proceedings" and provides its analysis from the different points of view, reveals the essence of the judicial proceedings. Also the fundamental functions and principles of justice were presented and examined in present article. In this part the author addresses the question of the relationship of the specialization of courts with the function of justice and of the relation of judicial proceedings and justice.

KEYWORDS

functions of justice, multifunctionality of justice, justice, judicial control, judicial authority, judicial proceedings.

1. Berg L. N. Teorii yuridicheskogo protsessa: sravnitel´no-pravovoy analiz. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2011. № 3.

2. Zhilin G. A. Konstitutsionnoe sudoproizvodstvo v mekhanizme sudebnoy zashchity prav. Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya. 2011. № 4.

3. Kashanyan K. G. O nekotorykh voprosakh konstitutsionnogo sudoproizvodstva (po materialam stran SNG i Baltii). Problemy obrazovaniya i deyatel´nosti konstitutsionnykh (ustavnykh) sudov sub´´ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii: materialy Vserossiyskogo soveshchaniya (Moskva, 24 dekabrya 1999 g.) / pod red. M. A. Mityukova i dr. M., 2000.

4. Kladiy E. V. Sudebnaya vlast´ v sisteme gosudarstvennoy vlasti Rossiyskoy Federatsii: avtoref. dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2002.

5. Konstitutsionnoe (gosudarstvennoe) pravo zarubezhnykh stran: v 4 t. T. 1-2. Chast´ obshchaya / otv. red. B. A. Strashun. M., 2000.

6. Konstitutsionnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii: uchebnik / I. A. Alzheev, I. B. Vlasenko, E. Yu. Dogadaylo i dr.; otv. red. S. I. Nosov. M., 2014.

7. Konstitutsionnoe pravosudie. Sudebno-konstitutsionnoe pravo i protsess: ucheb. posobie / N. V. Vitruk. 3-e izd. M., 2011.

8. Luk´yanova E. G. Teoriya protsessual´nogo prava. M., 2003.

9. Perlov I. D. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo v SSSR. M., 1959.

10. Protasov V. N. Osnovy obshchepravovoy protsessual´noy teorii. M., 1991.

11. Rossinskiy S. B. Ugolovnyy protsess Rossii: kurs lektsiy. M., 2007.

12. Sakhapov R. R. Stanovlenie i sposoby oformleniya printsipov ustnosti, pis´mennosti i neposredstvennosti ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva v doreformennoy Rossii (XV - pervaya polovina XIX v.). Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. 2014. № 8.

13. Serkov P. P. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost´ v rossiyskom prave: sovremennoe osmyslenie i novye podkhody: monografiya. M., 2012.

14. Slepchenko E. V. Grazhdanskoe sudoproizvodstvo. Problemy edinstva i differentsiatsii. SPb., 2011.

15. Sokolov T. V. K voprosu o sushchnosti ugolovnogo protsessa v kontekste doktriny sudebnogo prava. Rossiyskiy sud´ya. 2013. № 6.

16. Tolkovyy slovar´ Ushakova. 1935-1940. URL: http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/ushakov/1046834.

17. Ugolovnyy protsess: uchebnik dlya vuzov / otv. red. A. V. Grinenko. M., 2004.

18. Foynitskiy I. Ya. Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. SPb., 1996.

19. Chetyan M. A. Pravovye osnovy organizatsii i deyatel´nosti mirovoy yustitsii v sovremennoy Rossii: istoriko-pravovoe issledovanie: dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. Kolomna, 2003.

20. Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar´ F. A. Brokgauza i I. A. Efrona. 1890-1907. URL: http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/brokgauz_efron/98143.

JATS XML

Editor-in-Chief, editorial board chair

GOST

Syerkov P. Polyfunctionality of Justice: Reality or Legal Reality Interpretation? // Journal of Russian Law. 2016. no. 12. pp. 0-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/22735. (Date of access 25.10.2026).

MLA

Pyetr Syerkov. "Polyfunctionality of Justice: Reality or Legal Reality Interpretation?." Journal of Russian Law 4.12 (2016): 0-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/22735.

APA

Syerkov P. (2016). Polyfunctionality of Justice: Reality or Legal Reality Interpretation?. Journal of Russian Law, 4(12), 0-0. https://doi.org/10.12737/22735

Chicago

Pyetr Syerkov. "Polyfunctionality of Justice: Reality or Legal Reality Interpretation?." Journal of Russian Law 4, no. 12 (2016): 0-0. https://doi.org/10.12737/22735.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = Syerkov P. | title = Polyfunctionality of Justice: Reality or Legal Reality Interpretation? | journal = Journal of Russian Law | year = 2016 | volume = 4 | issue = 12 | pages = 0-0 | doi = 10.12737/22735 }}

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

POLYFUNCTIONALITY OF JUSTICE: REALITY OR LEGAL REALITY INTERPRETATION? Polyfunctionality of Justice: Reality or Legal Reality Interpretation?

Confirmation