Civil Suit as a Part of Criminal Case: Theory and Practice

Tatyana Sushina

doi:10.12737/18039

CIVIL SUIT AS A PART OF CRIMINAL CASE: THEORY AND PRACTICE Civil Suit as a Part of Criminal Case: Theory and Practice

АА Аа

Published in Journal of Russian Law · Pages 0–0 · Rubric: Procedural Law

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/18039

Received: 02.03.2016 Accepted: 02.03.2016 Published: 02.03.2016 Language of publication: RUS

Authors

Tatyana Sushina

ABSTRACT

The article analyzes the problematic issues in resolution of civil suit for compensation of property or moral damage caused by crime. The author describes the concept of civil suit in criminal case, notes the advantages, disadvantages and some methods of providing proof. The civil suit is suggested to be seen as the right of victim that should be respected by prosecuting authorities and courts. According to statistics, there is a noticeable decrease in the total number of civil suits in criminal cases. The article includes some thoughts about the reasons for such a decrease and the difficulties which lawyers can face. The author develops new attitude towards civil suit in criminal case, contributing to improve the performance of the prosecuting authorities and courts.

KEYWORDS

Civil plaintiff, civil defendant, evidence, victim, criminal procedures, property damage, personal damage, justice, recourse action.

1. Claus Roxin, Bernd Schünemann. Strafverfahrensrecht. 27. Auflage. C. H. Beck. München, 2012.

2. Bozh´ev V. P. Grazhdanskiy isk v ugolovnom dele kak predmet ugolovno-protsessual´nykh otnosheniy. Rossiyskiy sledovatel´. 2011. № 16.

3. Bozrov V. Grazhdanskiy isk v ugolovnom dele neumesten. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2001. № 5.

4. Vladykina T. Grazhdanskiy isk v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Ugolovnoe pravo. 2013. № 1.

5. Voskobitova L. Mekhanizm realizatsii sudebnoy vlasti posredstvom ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: dis.... d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2004.

6. Grinenko A. Poterpevshiy dolzhen imet´ ne men´she protsessual´nykh prav, chem obvinyaemyy. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2002. № 9.

7. Dikarev I. S. Printsip dispozitivnosti v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii / pod red. A. P. Krutikova. Volgograd, 2005.

8. Dubrovin V. V. Vozmeshchenie vreda, prichinennogo prestupleniem, putem kompensatsii so storony gosudarstva (otechestvennyy i zarubezhnyy opyt). Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yustitsiya. 2010. № 3.

9. Kurmakaeva S. M. Regressnyy isk v ugolovnom dele: avtoref. dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. L., 1989.

10. Militsin S., Popkova E. Ugolovnoe delo i grazhdanskiy isk: vmeste ili porozn´?. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2001. № 7.

11. Miroshnichenko M., Vasyushkin V. Obrashchenie transportnykh prokurorov v sudy s iskami o vozmeshchenii vreda, prichinennogo korruptsionnymi prestupleniyami. Zakonnost´. 2012. № 11.

12. Neretin N. K voprosu o pred´´yavlenii grazhdanskogo iska v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Rossiyskiy sud´ya. 2012. № 1.

13. Os´kina I., Lupu A. Grazhdanskiy isk v ugolovnom protsesse. ezh-Yurist. 2014. № 11.

14. Piksin N. N. Grazhdanskiy isk v ugolovnom protsesse: realizatsiya prav isttsa i otvetchika. Ugolovnyy protsess. 2005. № 3.

15. Pomerantsev I., Belokovyl´skiy M. Grazhdanskiy isk v ugolovnom protsesse: problemy pravoprimeneniya i napravleniya sovershenstvovaniya pravovogo regulirovaniya. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2010. № 10.

16. Rokhlin V. I. Kazantsev V. G. Poterpevshiy v ugolovnom protsesse. Advokat. 2011. № 5.

17. Savkina M. A. Otvetstvennost´ gosudarstva pered poterpevshimi ot prestupleniya i mekhanizm kompensatsii ushcherba. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2014. № 5.

18. Ustav ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva ot 20 noyabrya 1864 g.. Rossiyskoe zakonodatel´stvo Kh-KhKh vv.: v 9 t. T. 8: Sudebnaya reforma. M., 1991.

19. Khokhryakov M. A. Predely sudebnogo razbiratel´stva ugolovnykh del v sude pervoy instantsii: zakonodatel´stvo, teoriya, praktika: avtoref. dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2013.

20. Khromova N. M. Osobennosti vozmeshcheniya vreda v sudebnoy deyatel´nosti. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2013. № 11.

21. Yakimovich Yu. K. Uchastie poterpevshego v ugolovnom presledovanii. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2014. № 4.

JATS XML

Editor-in-Chief, editorial board chair

GOST

Sushina T. Civil Suit as a Part of Criminal Case: Theory and Practice // Journal of Russian Law. 2016. no. 3. pp. 0-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/18039. (Date of access 09.09.2026).

MLA

Tatyana Sushina. "Civil Suit as a Part of Criminal Case: Theory and Practice." Journal of Russian Law 4.3 (2016): 0-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/18039.

APA

Sushina T. (2016). Civil Suit as a Part of Criminal Case: Theory and Practice. Journal of Russian Law, 4(3), 0-0. https://doi.org/10.12737/18039

Chicago

Tatyana Sushina. "Civil Suit as a Part of Criminal Case: Theory and Practice." Journal of Russian Law 4, no. 3 (2016): 0-0. https://doi.org/10.12737/18039.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = Sushina T. | title = Civil Suit as a Part of Criminal Case: Theory and Practice | journal = Journal of Russian Law | year = 2016 | volume = 4 | issue = 3 | pages = 0-0 | doi = 10.12737/18039 }}

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

CIVIL SUIT AS A PART OF CRIMINAL CASE: THEORY AND PRACTICE Civil Suit as a Part of Criminal Case: Theory and Practice

Confirmation