INDIVIDUAL APPROACH AS A TREND IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN LEGISLATION
Authors:
1.
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
(kafedra teorii prava i gosudarstva, professor kafedry)
employee
Russian Federation
employee
Russian Federation
Type:
Article
Pages:
from 0
to 0
Status:
Published
Received:
14.12.2015
Accepted:
14.12.2015
Published:
14.12.2015
Language:
Russian
Keywords:
Legal regulation, individual legal regulation, legislation, system of legislation, the crisis of law.
Abstract (English):
The article examines modern trends in the development of domestic legislation. The author believes that the research traditions of the 1930—1950s do not any longer correspond to the realities of the legal system of today. The most important trend in modern dynamics of law is the individualization of the legal scope of regulation. Today we witness the creation of new types of laws — management, organization — to provide for the terms and conditions for social, political and other various types of events (Olympic Games, football World Cup, etc.). Also we witness the emergence of statutory laws which are created to lay down special status for various enterprises, organizations, agencies. The author believes that not all of those draft laws are of objective necessity. Examples are many. Other rules of individualization are subject to analysis. In general, it is concluded that the trend of individualization (fragmentation) is gaining momentum, and this is to be taken into account when we study the structure of the legislation and the structure of law.
The article examines modern trends in the development of domestic legislation. The author believes that the research traditions of the 1930—1950s do not any longer correspond to the realities of the legal system of today. The most important trend in modern dynamics of law is the individualization of the legal scope of regulation. Today we witness the creation of new types of laws — management, organization — to provide for the terms and conditions for social, political and other various types of events (Olympic Games, football World Cup, etc.). Also we witness the emergence of statutory laws which are created to lay down special status for various enterprises, organizations, agencies. The author believes that not all of those draft laws are of objective necessity. Examples are many. Other rules of individualization are subject to analysis. In general, it is concluded that the trend of individualization (fragmentation) is gaining momentum, and this is to be taken into account when we study the structure of the legislation and the structure of law.
Keywords:
Legal regulation, individual legal regulation, legislation, system of legislation, the crisis of law.
Legal regulation, individual legal regulation, legislation, system of legislation, the crisis of law.
1. Demidova A. i dr. Zakon o popravke zdorov´ya. Vedomosti. 2015. 19 avg.
2. Ershov V. V. Pravovoe i individual´noe regulirovanie obshchestvennykh otnosheniy kak parnye kategorii. Rossiyskiy sud´ya. 2013. № 2.
3. Minnikes I. A. Elementy individual´nogo pravovogo regulirovaniya v grazhdanskom protsessual´nom prave. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul´tantPlyus».
4. Minnikes I. A. Elementy individual´nogo pravovogo regulirovaniya v semeynom prave. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul´tantPlyus».
5. Mukhina M. Do posledney kapli masla. Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2015. 19 okt.
6. Nekhaychuk Yu. Gektary dlya mass. Vedomosti. 2015. 12 noyab.
7. Shentulin A. P. Kategorii dialektiki. M., 1971.
