Vietnam
Vietnam
UDK 324 Выборы. Референдумы. Плебисциты. Избирательные кампании.Коррупция при выборах
The aim of this research paper is to identify and analyze the factors determining the evolution of electoral systems in Vietnam and their consequent impact on political representation and citizen participation. To achieve this objective, the study meticulously examines the historical development of electoral mechanisms, starting from the French colonial era through to the current Socialist Republic of Vietnam. A significant milestone in this evolution was the implementation of the "Doi Moi" (Renovation) reforms in 1986, which marked a pivotal turning point, ushering in substantial political and economic changes. These reforms not only restructured the economy but also had profound implications for the electoral system and governance. The methodological framework of this study is grounded in qualitative document analysis, encompassing a diverse range of sources such as legal documents, government publications, academic literature, and media sources. Through rigorous content analysis, the study identifies and examines historical trends and key themes that have shaped and influenced the electoral system over time. The study concludes by asserting that, despite the inherent challenges posed by its one-party structure, Vietnam's electoral system is continuously evolving with an aim to enhance representativeness and responsiveness. The findings suggest that while the system retains certain unique characteristics, it is progressively adapting to improve political representation and foster greater citizen participation in the governance process. Through this detailed examination, the paper provides valuable insights into the intricate relationship between electoral systems, political power, and citizen engagement in Vietnam.
Electoral Systems, the Communist Party of Vietnam, Political Representation, One-Party State, National Assembly, Socialist Governance, Political Participation.
1. Gakhramanovich G. R. Authoritarianism and its manifestations in the modern world. Voprosy rossiyskoy yustitsii [Questions of Russian Justice]. 2019, No. 2, pp. 56-60. (In Russian).
2. Pecheritsa V.F., Vlasov E.E. Socialist Republic of Vietnam: from authoritarianism to market socialism (on the 30th anniversary of the "Doi Moi" policy). Vestnik Zabaikal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Transbaikal State University]. 2016, No. 7 (22), pp. 81-90. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21209/2227-9245-2016-22-7-81-90. (In Russian).
3. Phan T. N. The ruling Communist Party of Vietnam: position, role, and problems. Teoriya i praktika sovremennoy nauki [Theory and Practice of Modern Science]. 2023, (4 (94)), pp. 275-281. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.7966479. (In Russian).
4. Fedorovna M. G. The political elite of Vietnam at the beginning of the renovation era (Doi Moi). V'etnamskie issledovaniya [Vietnamese Studies]. 2011, No. 1, pp. 59-89. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21209/2227-9245-2016-22-7-81-90. (In Russian).
5. Tran T.M.T. Understanding democracy and the democratization process in Vietnam during the renovation period: time for decisions. V'etnamskie issledovaniya [Vietnamese Studies]. 2019, No. 4, pp. 18-27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24411/2618-9453-2019-10036.
6. Bui T. H. Dilemmas in the Construction of a Socialist Law-based State in Vietnam: Electoral Integrity and Reform. Asian Studies Review. 2018. No. 2 (42). pp. 286–303. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2018.1451490.
7. Croissant A., Lorenz P. Vietnam: The Socialist Party State Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. pp. 367–402. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68182-5_12.
8. Duiker W. J. Vietnam in 1984: Between Ideology and Pragmatism. Asian Survey. 1985. No. 1 (25). pp. 97–105. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2644060.
9. Fall B. B. North Viet-Nam’s New Draft Constitution. Pacific Affairs. 1959. No. 2 (32). pp. 178. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2753563.
10. Fall B. B. Power and Pressure Groups in North Vietnam. The China Quarterly. 1962. (9). pp. 37–46. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741000025200.
11. Ginsburgs G. Local Government and Administration in the Democratic Republic of Vietnam since 1954 (Part I). The China Quarterly. 1962. (12). pp. 211–230. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741000020865.
12. Gray M. L. Creating Civil Society? The Emergence of NGOs in Vietnam. Development and Change. 1999. No. 4 (30). pp. 693–713. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00134.
13. Hammer E. J. South Viet Nam: The Limits of Political Action. Pacific Affairs. 1962. No. 1 (35). pp. 24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2752709.
14. He B., Thøgersen S. Giving the People a Voice? Experiments with consultative authoritarian institutions in China. Journal of Contemporary China. 2010. No. 66 (19). pp. 675–692. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2010.485404.
15. Hiep L. H. Vietnam. Politics in contemporary Vietnam: Party, state, and authority relations. Edited by Jonathan D. London Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. pp. 230. Notes, Bibliography, Index. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies. 2017. No. 1 (48). pp. 169–172. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463416000667.
16. Holcombe A. Mass Mobilization in the Democratic Republic of Vietnam, 1945–1960 / A. Holcombe, University of Hawaii Press, 2020. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv105bb0z.
17. Jumper R. Mandarin Bureaucracy and Politics in South Viet Nam. Pacific Affairs. 1957. No. 1 (30). pp. 47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2752660.
18. Kim N. K. Reassessing the relationship between elections and democratization. International Political Science Review. 2020. No. 3 (41). pp. 305–320. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512119846144.
19. King P. The Political Balance in Saigon. Pacific Affairs. 1971. No. 3 (44). pp. 401. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2755712.
20. Lacouture J. North Vietnam Faces Peace. International Affairs. 1973. No. 4 (49). pp. 567–573. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2616476.
21. Levitsky S., Way L. The New Competitive Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy. 2020. No. 1 (31). pp. 51–65. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2020.0004.
22. Libby S. The Art of Censorship in Vietnam. Journal of International Affairs. 2011. No. 1 (65). pp. 209–218.
23. Malesky E. J. Enhancing Research on Authoritarian Regimes through Detailed Comparisons of China and Vietnam. Problems of Post-Communism. 2021. No. 3 (68). pp. 163–170. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2020.1865822.
24. Malesky E., Schuler P. Star Search: Do Elections Help Nondemocratic Regimes Identify New Leaders? Journal of East Asian Studies. 2013. No. 1 (13). pp. 35–68. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1598240800008523.
25. Mau M. P. The Training of Cadres in the Lao Dong Party of North Vietnam, 1960-1967. Asian Survey. 1969. No. 4 (9). pp. 281–296. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2642546.
26. Montessoro F. La lotta di fazione nel Partito comunista vietnamita. LED Edizioni Universitarie, 2017. DOI:https://doi.org/10.7359/826-2017-mont.
27. News V. Toan van Ban Tuyen ngon doc lap cua Ho Chi Minh nam 1945. VietNamNet News [Electronic resource]. URL: https://vietnamnet.vn/toan-van-ban-tuyen-ngon-doc-lap-771240.html (accessed on: 08.07.2024).
28. Nguyen H. H. United Front: Projecting Solidarity through Deliberation in Vietnam’s Single Party Legislature by Paul Schuler (review). Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs. 2022. (44). pp. 166–168.
29. Nguyen H. H., Pham M. Q. Democratization in Vietnam’s Post-Đổi Mới One-Party Rule: Change from Within, Change from the Bottom to the Top, and Possibilities. Edited by C. Banpasirichote Wungaeo, B. Rehbein, S. Wun’gaeo, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016. pp. 131–155. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57654-5_7.
30. Nguyen M. D. Economy for Independence: A Reappraisal on Economy of Resistance of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam in the Period 1945–1954. The World of the Orient. 2015. No. 1 (2015). pp. 13–25. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15407/orientw2015.01.013.
31. Nguyen Thi Ha, Dong Ju Choi. The Political Economy of Vietnam’s Economic Development: Searching for Nature of the State. The Southeast Asian Review. 2020. No. 3 (29). pp. 99–130. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21485/HUFSEA.2020.29.3.004.
32. Peters E. J. Culinary Crossings and Disruptive Identities: Contesting Colonial Categories in Everyday Life. Edited by J. B. Winston, L. C.-P. Ollier, New York: Palgrave Macmillan US,
33. Phan T. L. The struggle movement for implementation of the Paris Agreement in Sai Gon - Gia Dinh (1973-1975). Science & Technology Development Journal - Social Science and Humanities. 2022. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32508/stdjssh.v6i2.733.
34. Phuc N. T., Nga C. T. H., Thuy P. T. Economic relations between Vietnam and the Soviet Union (1986-1991). European Journal of Social Sciences Studies. 2023. No. 1 (9). DOI:https://doi.org/10.46827/ejsss.v9i1.1551.
35. Porter G. The U.S. and Vietnam: Between War and Friendship. Southeast Asian Affairs 1977. 1977. No. 1 (1977). pp. 325–338. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1355/SEAA77X.
36. Quoc hoi Vietnam Hien phap Vietnam nam 1946 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://moj.gov.vn/vbpq/lists/vn%20bn%20php%20lut/view_detail.aspx?itemid=536 (accessed on: 08.07.2024).
37. Quoc hoi Vietnam Hien phap Viet Nam nam 1959 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.moj.gov.vn/vbpq/lists/vn%20bn%20php%20lut/view_detail.aspx?itemid=890 (accessed on: 08.07.2024).
38. Quoc hoi Vietnam Hien phap Vietnam nam 1980 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://moj.gov.vn/vbpq/lists/vn%20bn%20php%20lut/view_detail.aspx?itemid=1536 (accessed on: 09.07.2024).
39. Quoc hoi Vietnam Hien phap Vietnam nam 1992 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://tulieuvankien.dangcongsan.vn/he-thong-van-ban/van-ban-quy-pham-phap-luat/hien-phap-nam-1992-240 (accessed on: 09.07.2024).
40. Quoc hoi Vietnam Hien phap Vietnam nam 2013. vanban.chinhphu.vn [Electronic resource]. URL: http://vanban.chinhphu.vn/hien-phap-nam-2013-68379 (accessed on: 09.07.2024).
41. Sacks I. M. Restructuring Government in South Vietnam. Asian Survey. 1967. No. 8 (7). pp. 515–526. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2642593.
42. Scigliano R. G. Political Parties in South Vietnam Under the Republic. Pacific Affairs. 1960. No. 4 (33). pp. 327. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2753393.
43. Shabad T. Economic Developments in North Vietnam. Pacific Affairs. 1958. No. 1 (31). pp. 36. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2753681.
44. Skokan J. A Short Overview of French’s Colonialism in Vietnam and its Impacts. International Journal of Culture and Education. 2023. No. 2 (1). pp. 8–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.59600/ijcae.v1i2.12.
45. Thanh P. Q. et al. Ruling Mode of Communist Party of Vietnam in Theory and Practice. Chinese Political Science Review. 2020. No. 4 (5). pp. 488–512. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-020-00162-1.
46. Thayer C. A. The Challenges Facing Vietnamese Communism. Southeast Asian Affairs 1992. 1992. No. 1 (1992). pp. 349–364. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1355/SEAA92T.
47. Thayer C. A. Vietnam: The Stewardship of Nong Duc Manh. Southeast Asian Affairs 2003. 2003. No. 1 (2003). pp. 313–326. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1355/SEAA03S.
48. Thayer C. A. Political Legitimacy of Vietnam’s One Party State: Challenges and Responses. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs. 2009. No. 4 (28). pp. 47–70. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/186810340902800403.
49. Thoa T. T. Legislation on direct democracy in modern Vietnam. UPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia). 2022. No. 3 (10). pp. 105–112. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2022-10-3-105-112.
50. Wiegersma N., Medley J. E. US Intervention in Vietnam. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2000. pp. 71–93. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333983867_5.
51. Woodside A. Vietnamese Peasants Under French Domination, 1861–1945. The Journal of Asian Studies. 1986. No. 5 (45). pp. 1117–1119. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2056649.
52. pp. 21–31. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230107410_4.
