from 01.10.2008 until now
Russian Federation
70 years ago, the bloodiest of wars had ended. Literally, the next day the USA started the ruthless Cold war against the USSR. Goal – to destroy the USSR as political and military enemy. Ironically, it was the Russian Empire (and the Soviet Union – its successor) that first in the world recognized the USA as an independent state. In 1991, the goal was achieved. Russia considered the cold war over, and the USA a partner in all matters. In vain. It is no secret the CIA felt home in Russian governmental buildings. It is no secret that Department of State advisers sat in every Russian Ministry. Unsurprisingly, imposed reforms have led to destruction of industry, agriculture, and medicine. The country was flooded with imports, and Russia has lost the basic security of state. Obviously, the same benefactors from the CIA forced the Ministry of Education and Science to adopt the surrogate instead of the Soviet system of education. Moreover, the well-wishers perfectly knew that this surrogate was of very low quality. Introduction of the American system of education instead of the Soviet one is the manifestation of the cold war. Artificial confrontation of computer graphics vs. descriptive geometry arose. Enforced antagonism resulted in elimination of teaching descriptive geometry in many areas. Known: computers and computer graphics come from the USA. Note that geometry experts do not oppose to the use of computer graphics. More obscure is the position of some of our partners, when they advocate destruction of science in favor of a drawing instrument. In this mortal combat of geeks, the author sees a manifestation of the same cold war that the United States maintains with Russia. Deduction: it is so because computer graphics took all its geometric methods of constructing from descriptive geometry. Minimal program of overcoming this geometric crisis in higher education is provided.
pedagogy, descriptive geometry, computer graphics, engineering graphics, training quality, Cold war.
Если ты выстрелишь в прошлое из пистолета, будущее выстрелит в тебя из пушки.
Расул Гамзатов
1. Сначала немного истории
Известно, что история совершенно ничему не учит, но тем не менее… Попробуем определить, с чего все началось, и отыскать колыбель американизации всего российского образования, в частности образования геометрического, и что случилось в этом плане с начертательной геометрией.
Ровно 70 лет назад закончилась самая кровавая из войн, затронувшая каждую семью, проживающую в то время в Советском Союзе – Великая Отечественная война. Но недолго пришлось радоваться победе.
Не секрет, что буквально на следующий же день после окончания этой прóклятой всеми жителями СССР войны североамериканская страна под названием США начала против Советского Союза безжалостную холодную войну. Целью этой войны было уничтожить Советский Союз как политического и военного противника для того, чтобы воцарилось всемирное господство только одной-единственной империи – США. Сейчас многие политики и политологи считают, что США и Англия три года – с 1941 по 1944 – ждали, когда Германия и СССР уничтожат друг друга, поэтому, прикидываясь союзниками, не открывали второй фронт. А вот когда уяснили для себя, что СССР и без их помощи уничтожит фашизм – тогда и только тогда им потребовалось урвать кусок пирога изо рта уже почти почившего нацизма.
1. Botvinnikov A.D., Vinogradov V.N., Vyshnepol´skij I.S. Cherchenie: uchebnik dlja obshheobrazovatel´nyh uchrezhdenij [Drawing: a textbook for educational institutions]. Moscow, AST Publ., Astrel´ Publ., 2014. 221 p.
2. Bubennikov A.V., Gromov M.Ja. Nachertatel´naja geometrija [Descriptive geometry]. Moscow, Vysshaja shkola Publ., 1973. 416 p.
3. Budasov B.V. Kaminskij V.P. Stroitel´noe cherchenie [Civil engineering drawing]. Moscow, Strojizdat Publ., 1990. 464 p.
4. Vinnickij I.G. Nachertatel´naja geometrija [Descriptive geometry]. Moscow, Vysshaja shkola Publ., 1975. 280 p.
5. Volkova M.Ju., Egorycheva E.V. Graficheskaja gramotnost´ inzhenera kak sposob poluchenija fundamental´nyh professional´nyh znanij [Graphic literacy of the engineer as a way of obtaining fundamental professional knowledge]. Geometrija i grafika [Geometry and graphics], 2014, V. 2, I. 1, pp. 53-57. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/3849. (in Russian).
6. Voloshin-Chelpan Je.K. Nachertatel´naja geometrija. Inzhenernaja grafika [Descriptive geometry. Engineering graphics]. Moscow, Akademicheskij proekt Publ., 2009. 183 p.
7. Voloshinov D.V. O perspektivah razvitija geometrii i ee instrumentarija [About prospects of development of geometry and its tools]. Geometrija i grafika [Geometry and graphics], 2014, V. 2, I. 1, pp. 15-21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/3844. (in Russian).
8. Voloshinov D.V., Solomonov K.N. Konstruktivnoe geometricheskoe modelirovanie kak perspektiva prepodavanija graficheskih discipline [Constructive geometric modeling as the prospect of teaching graphic disciplines]. Geometrija i grafika [Geometry and graphics], 2013, V. 1, I. 2, pp. 10-13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/778. (in Russian).
9. Vol´berg O.A. Lekcii po nachertatel´noj geometrii [Lectures on descriptive geometry]. Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe uchebnopedagogicheskoe izdatel´stvo Ministerstva Prosveshhenija RSFSR Publ., 1947.
10. Vol´hin K.A., Astahova T.A. Problemy graficheskoj podgotovki studentov tehnicheskogo universiteta [Problems graphic training of students of technical University]. Geometrija i grafika [Geometry and graphics]. 2014, V. 2, I. 3, pp. 24-28. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/6522. (in Russian).
11. Vyshnepol´skij V.I., Salkov N.A. Celi i metody obuchenija graficheskim disciplinam [Objectives and methods of teaching graphic disciplines]. Geometrija i grafika [Geometry and graphics], 2013, V. 1, I. 2, pp. 8-9. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/777. (in Russian).
12. Vyshnepol´skij I.S. Tehnicheskoe cherchenie [Technical drawing]. Moscow, Vysshaja shkola Publ., 2009. 224 p.
13. Glagolev N.A. Nachertatel´naja geometrija [Descriptive geometry]. Moscow, Leningrad, ONTI NKTP SSSR Publ., Glavnaja redakcija obshhetehnicheskoj literatury i nomografii, 1936. 160 p.
14. Glazunov E.A., Chetveruhin N.F. Aksonometrija [Axonometry]. Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe izd-vo tehniko-teoreticheskoj literatury Publ., 1953.
15. Gordon V.O., Semencov-Ogievskij M.A. Kurs nachertatel´noj geometrii [A course in descriptive geometry]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1977. 268 p.
16. Gordon V.O. Cherchenie ploskih i prostranstvennyh figur: Posobie dlja uchitelej srednej shkoly [Drawing plane and solid figures: a Handbook for secondary school teachers]. Moscow, Uchpedgiz RSFSR Publ., 1951. 264 p.
17. Ivanov G.S. Nachertatel´naja geometrija [Descriptive geometry]. Moscow, FGBOU VPO MGUL Publ., 2012. 340 p.
18. Ivanov G.S. Perspektivy nachertatel´noj geometrii kak uchebnoj discipliny [Perspective descriptive geometry as an academic discipline]. Geometrija i grafika [Geometry and graphics], 2013, V. 1, I. 1, pp. 26-27. (in Russian).
19. Ivanov G.S. Teoreticheskie osnovy nachertatel´noj geometrii [Theoretical foundations of descriptive geometry]. Moscow, Mashinostroenie Publ., 1998. 158 p.
20. Kadykova N.S., Salkov N.A. Reformirovanie ocenok geometrograficheskih znanij [Reforming assessments hemerograficas knowledge]. Geometrija i grafika [Geometry and graphics]. 2013, V. 1, I. 1, pp. 52-53. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/475. (in Russian).
21. Koroev Ju.I. Nachertatel´naja geometrija [Descriptive geometry]. Moscow, KNORUS Publ., 2011. 432 p.
22. Levickij V.S. Mashinostroitel´noe cherchenie [Engineering drawing]. Moscow, Vysshaja shkola Publ., 1988. 351 p.
23. Loktev O.V. Kratkij kurs nachertatel´noj geometrii [A short course in descriptive geometry]. Moscow, Vysshaja shkola Publ., 1985. 136 p.
24. Peklich V.A. Nachertatel´naja geometrija [Descriptive geometry]. Moscow, Izdatel´stvo associacii stroitel´nyh vuzov Publ., 2007. 272 p.
25. Polushina T.A. Internet-trenazher po nachertatel´noj geometrii i inzhenernoj grafike v uchebnom processe [Web-based the simulator on descriptive geometry and engineering graphics in the educational process]. Geometrija i grafika [Geometry and graphics], 2013, V. 1, I. 2, pp. 33-37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/910. (in Russian).
26. P´jankova Zh.A. Formirovanie gotovnosti studentov operirovat´ prostranstvennymi ob´ektami v processe izuchenija geometrograficheskih discipline. Kand. Diss. [Formation of readiness of students to operate features in the process of studying geometricgraphic disciplines. Cand. Diss.]. Ekaterinburg, 2015. 31 p.
27. Russkevich N.L. Nachertatel´naja geometrija [Descriptive geometry]. Kiev, Vishha shkola Publ., 1978. 312 p.
28. Salkov N.A. Distancionnoe obuchenie graficheskim disciplinam. Testirovanie. Analiz situacii [Distance learning graphic courses. Testing. Analysis of the situation]. Geometrija i grafika [Geometry and graphics], 2013, V. 2, I. 4, pp. 7-14. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/8292. (in Russian).
29. Salkov N.A. Iskusstvo i nachertatel´naja geometrija [Art and descriptive geometry]. Geometrija i grafika [Geometry and graphics], 2013, V. 1, I. 3-4, pp. 3-7. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12373/2123. (in Russian).
30. Salkov N.A. Nachertatel´naja geometrija: Bazovyj kurs [Descriptive geometry: Basic course]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2013. 174 p.
31. Salkov N.A. Nachertatel´naja geometrija. Osnovnoj kurs [Descriptive geometry: the main course]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2014. 235 p.
32. Salkov N.A. Ob amerikanizacii rossijskogo obrazovanija [About the Americanization of Russian education]. Problemy kachestva graficheskoj podgotovki studentov v tehnicheskom vuze: tradicii i innovacii. Materialy V Mezhdunarodnoj internetkonferencii KGP-2014 [Problems of quality graphic training of students in technical education: traditions and innovations. Proceedings of the V International Internet conference PSGE-2014]. Perm´, 2014. (in Russian).
33. Salkov N.A. Problemy sovremennogo geometricheskogo obrazovanija [Problems of modern geometric education]. Problemy kachestva graficheskoj podgotovki studentov v tehnicheskom vuze: tradicii i innovacii. Materialy IV Mezhdunarodnoj internetkonferencii KGP-2014 [Problems of quality graphic training of students in technical education: traditions and innovations. Proceedings of the V International Internet conference PSGE-2014]. Perm´ 2014, pp. 38-46. (in Russian).
34. Salkov N.A., Kadykova N.S. Organizacija studencheskih predmetnyh olimpiad vysshego urovnja [Organization of student competitions of the highest level]. Geometrija i grafika [Geometry and graphics]. 2013, V. 1, I. 1, pp. 80-82. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/485. (in Russian).
35. Sobolev N.A. Obshhaja teorija izobrazhenij [The General theory images]. Moscow, Izdatel´stvo «Arhitektura-S» Publ., 2004. 672 p.
36. Stolbova I.D. Aktual´nye problemy graficheskoj podgotovki studentov v tehnicheskih vuzah [Actual problems of graphic training of students in technical universities]. Geometrija i grafika [Geometry and graphics], 2014, V. 2, I. 1, pp. 30-41. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/3846. (in Russian).
37. Sufljaeva N.E. Sovremennye aspekty prepodavanija graficheskih disciplin v tehnicheskih vuzah [Modern aspects of teaching graphics courses in technical colleges]. Geometrija i grafika [Geometry and graphics], 2013, V. 1, I. 1, pp. 80-82. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/8294. (in Russian).
38. Tihonov-Bugrov D.E. O nekotoryh problemah graficheskoj podgotovki v tehnicheskih vuzah [About some problems of graphic training in technical universities]. Geometrija i grafika [Geometry and graphics], 2014, V. 2, I. 1, pp. 46-52. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/3848. (in Russian).
39. Chumachenko G.V. Tehnicheskoe cherchenie [Engineering drawing]. Moscow, KNORUS Publ., 2013. 296 p.
