Voronezh State University of Forestry and Technologies named after G.F. Morozov
Voronezh, Russian Federation
The article examines the issues of researching two decision-making methods. The paper provides an algorithm for selecting various types of criteria for preference functions that give pairwise assessments of alternative values. Preference indices for all criteria are determined, and a matrix of these indices is constructed. The graph of weighted superiority is used for all alternatives based on the index matrix. Input and output flows are determined to assess the domination of alternatives. These flows ensure ranking of alternatives in complete order. Another method involves evaluating alternatives using fuzzy relations. Definitions of utility functions for given alternatives are given. Distributions of normalized assessments on an ordered scale are shown. Pairwise assessments of alternatives are considered. Decision-making for the two methods is demonstrated using the example of designing a workshop section, which is evaluated against six criteria for three alternatives. In this example, preference indices for each pair of alternatives are presented, assessments of output and input flows are provided, and a series of alternative preferences are shown. Utility functions and pairwise assessments of alternatives are presented for fuzzy relations. Assessments of the dominance share for criteria by various methods are given. The structures of criteria for methods where equivalence of values is observed and differences in the decision-making process are shown. Conclusions are drawn regarding the features that lead to discrepancies in assessments and at which stages for different methods. Recommendations are provided for using the analysis results for decision-making support. The application of the results of this research in practice will significantly enhance the efficiency of decision-making.
Decision-making method, criterion, alternative, utility functions, preference indices, domination, efficiency, analysis.
1. Upravlenie kachestvom uchebnogo processa / V.G. Gorbunov, O.L. Bordyuzha, V.V. Lavlinskiy, D.V. Baybekov // Modelirovanie sistem i processov. - 2023. - T. 16, №2. - S. 14-25. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/2219-0767-2023-16-2-14-25.
2. Gorbunov, V.G. Metodicheskie ukazaniya k vypolneniyu laboratornyh rabot po discipline «Teoriya informacionnyh processov i sistem» dlya studentov napravleniya 09.03.02 Informacionnye sistemy i tehnologii vseh form obucheniya / V.G. Gorbunov. - Voronezh, 2022. - 51 s.
3. Matematicheskie modeli i metody optimizacii : praktikum / S.A. Oleynikova [i dr.]. - Voronezh, 2023. - 104 s.
4. Scheerens, J. Evaluating educational quality: Models and challenges / J. Scheerens // Quality Assurance in Education. - 2018. - T. 26(3). - Rr. 267-284. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-07-2017-0052.
5. Li, L. Evaluating the teaching quality of Chinese universities based on DEA-Malmquist index: The roles of heterogeneity and diversity / L. Li, L. Yang, C. Li // Journal of Cleaner Production. - 2020. - T. 279. - S. 123654. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123654.
6. Belyanin, A.V. Modelirovanie upravleniya kachestvom obucheniya studentov na osnove sistemnogo podhoda / A.V. Belyanin, A.V. Romanyuk, L.M. Kozak // Vestnik Har'kovskogo nacional'nogo universiteta radioelektroniki. - 2021. - T. 23, № 2. - S. 134-142. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.15421/192114.
7. Al-Shehri, A. Applying Six Sigma to improve the quality of higher education: A case stud / A. Al-Shehri, N. Hatami // Total Quality Management & Business Excellence. -2019. - T. 30(11-12). - Pp. 1276-1289. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1418965.
8. Belousova, E.S. Sistema upravleniya kachestvom obrazovatel'nogo processa na osnove primeneniya sovremennyh metodov / E.S. Belousova, E.V. Kuznecova // Nauchnyy vestnik Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo social'nogo universiteta. - 2019. - №4. - S. 49-55. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.24411/2541-9051-2019-00005.
9. Lashgari, M. Evaluation of e-learning system quality: A fuzzy approach. / M. Lashgari, S Sadat Shafaatian, H. Ranjbar // Computersin Human Behavior. - 2019. - №91. - Pp. 150-161. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.032.
10. Zinov'eva, L.P. Kachestvo uchebnogo processa: upravlenie i ocenka / L.P. Zinov'eva, A.I. Kondakov, O.V. Mamonova // Nauchno-metodicheskiy elektronnyy zhurnal «Konceptual'noe razvitie upravleniya obrazovaniem». - 2019. - № 1. - S. 13-22. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.14486/crmu.v0i1.583.
11. Mironov, V.N. Upravlenie kachestvom uchebnogo processa na osnove modelirovaniya i analiza sistemy / V.N. Mironov, O.V. Chuhray // Izvestiya vuzov. Mashinostroenie. - 2021. - T. 64, № 6. - S. 529-536. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.18698/0536-1044-2021-6-529-536.
12. Zhernakova, E.A. Ocenka kachestva uchebnogo processa v vysshey shkole / E.A. Zhernakova, E.A. Tarasova, N.A. Koreneva // Izvestiya PGU. Seriya Estestvennye nauki. - 2021. - T. 6, № 6(83). - S. 145-151. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.25587/SNP.2021.6.62894.
13. Kondakov, A.I. Sistema upravleniya kachestvom uchebnogo processa v sovremennom vuze / A.I. Kondakov, L.P. Zinov'eva, O.V. Mamonova // Vestnik Penzenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. - 2019. - № 4. - S. 483-495. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.21603/2500-3372-2019-4-483-495.
14. Gaybullin, R.I. Metodika upravleniya kachestvom uchebnogo processa na osnove ocenki kompetentnostey studentov / R.I. Gaybullin, E.V. Harisov, R.I. Rahimov // Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniy. Severo-Kavkazskiy region. Tehnicheskie nauki. - 2020. - T. 27, № 4. - S. 20-29. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.31652/2076-5817-2020-4(27)-20-29.
15. Abasova, A.A. Ocenka effektivnosti upravleniya kachestvom obrazovaniya v vuze / A.A. Abasova, Z.A. Shirokova // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. - 2020. - №38. - S. 6-17. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.24411/1993-4316-2020-10001.
16. Budanceva, N.A. Metodicheskie podhody k ocenke kachestva obrazovatel'nyh programm / N.A. Budanceva, E.V. Gracheva, A.E. Kalashnikov // Obrazovanie i nauka. - 2019. - № 8. - S. 36-52. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2019-8-36-52.
17. Davydova, M.M. Ocenka kachestva obrazovatel'nogo processa v vuze na osnove sistemnogo podhoda / M.M. Davydova, S.V. Chaldybina // Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. - 2021. - №35. - S. 98-108. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.26516/2304-1226.2021.35.98.
18. Kuznecov, V.V. Modelirovanie processa upravleniya kachestvom obrazovaniya v vysshem uchebnom zavedenii / V.V. Kuznecov, N.V. Kulikova // Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Ekonomika. - 2021. - T. 21, № 2. - S. 167-180. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2329-2021-21-2-167-180.
19. Demetriadis, S. Analyzing and improving the quality of onlinel earning: A data analytics approach / S. Demetriadis, I. Vlahavas // Computers & Education. - 2021. - T. 156. - S. 104045. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104045.
20. Metody i modeli prinyatiya resheniy v zadachah ocenki kachestva i tehnicheskogo urovnya slozhnyh tehnicheskih sistem / S.S. Semenov, E.M. Voronov, A.V. Poltavskiy, A.V. Kryanev. - M. : Lenand, 2019. - 516 s.
21. Andreychikov, A.V. Sistemnyy analiz strategicheskih resheniy v innovatike. Matematicheskie, evristicheskie i intellektual'nye metody sistemnogo analiza innovaciy / A.V. Andreychikov, O.N. Andreychikova. - M. : Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2013. - 304 s.
22. Kalugina, A.V. Sistema podderzhki prinyatiya resheniy v cifrovoy metallografii / A.V. Kalugina, N.V. Mamonenko, E.E. Kovshov // Sovremennye naukoemkie tehnologii. - 2022. - № 1. - S. 53-58.
23. Pegat, A. Nechetkoe modelirovanie i upravlenie / A. Pegat. - M.: Binom. Laboratoriya znaniy, 2009. - 798s.
24. Brans, J. PROMETHEE methods / J. Brans, B. Marschal // Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. - 2005. - Pp. 163-196.
