THE PHENOMENJLOGY OF DISCOURSE AND THE FORMATION OF THE DISCURCIVE COMPETENCE AT NON-LINGUISTIC UNIVERSITIES
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The article deals with the phenomenon of discourse and discursive competence. The notion of discourse is defined, the interdisciplinary nature of the communicative phenomenon involved is emphasized. Various interpretations of discourse in modern humanities based on the purpose and the subject of each science as well as with regard to the ontological features of the phenomenon concerned are presented. Much attention is given to the analysis of substantial characteristics of discourse. Summarizing the research of scientists the authors make an attempt to solve the problem of the discourse typology and propose their own classification, with the basic principle being different aspects. The article features the essence and the structure of the foreign language discursive competence as an integral component of the communicative competence. Various definitions of the discursive competence are given. The article provides a nomenclature of approaches to master the foreign language discursive competence. A structural analysis of the foreign language discursive competence is conducted, its main components are identified. Ilt is found that the professional model to form the foreign language discursive competence is built in terms of system-forming didactic principles. The stages of training a professionally orientied foreign language within the framework of the discursive paradigm are considered. The article concludes that special psychological and pedagogical conditions contribute to the effective implementation of the process of the formation of the foreign language discursive competence.

Keywords:
discourse, discourse typology, discursive competence, principles of training technology
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Azimov E.G. Tchukin A.N. Novij slovar’metoditcheskich terminov i poniatij (teorija i praktika obutchenija jazikam). M., IKAR, 2009, 448 c.

2. Almazova N.I. Kognitivnije asppekti formirovanija megkul’turnoj kompetentnosti pri obutcenii inostranomu jaziku v nejazikovom vuze : avtoref. dis... doktora pedagogitcheskich nauk. SPb. 2003. 47 s.

3. Briksina I.E., Sukhanova N.I. Lingvokul’turnij kod kak sovokupnost’ znanij o kul’ture jazikovoj obchnosti.//filologitheskije nauki. Voprosi teorii i praktikii. Tambov : Gramota, 2014 N6 (36) : v 2 tchastijach. Tch.2 s.34-36

4. Van Dejk. Jazik, poznanije, kommunikatsija. M. : Progrzss, 1989. 307 s.

5. Gorbunov A.G. Diskursivnaja inijazitchnaja kompetentsija : ontologitcheskij podchod.//Vestnik TGPU, 2014. N6 (147). S. 161-174

6. Gorbunov A.G. Sinergitcheskij aaspekt formirovanija diskursivnoj inojazitchnoj kompetentsii buduchikh bakalavrov nejazikovikh napravlenij podkotovki//. Samarskij nautchnij vestnik. 2016, N4 ( 17). S. 169-174

7. Karasik V.I. Jazikovoj krug : litchost’, kontsepti, diskurs. M., Gnozis, 2004, 390 s.

8. Kubrijakova E.S. Jazik I znaanije: Na puti polutchenijaa znanij o jazike : Tchasti retchi s kognitivnoj totchki zrenija. Rol’ jazika v poznnii mira. M., Jaziki slavianskoj kul’turi, 2004, 560 s.

9. Lingvistchitcheskij entsiklopeditcheskij slovar’. M., Sovetskaja entsiklopedija, 1990. 683 s.

10. Prokhorov Y.E. Konsept, texte, diskurs : avtoref.dis...doktora filologitcheskich nauk, 2006, 40s

11. Manajenko G.N. O soderganii termina “diskurs”// Problemi verbalizatsii kontseptov v semantike jazika I texta: materiali megdunar. Simpoziuma (22-24 maja 2003 g). Tch.1, Volgograd, 2003. S. 23-26.

12. Minakova L.Y. Avtoreferaat dissertqtsii “Obutchenije inojazitchnomu diskursu studentov estestvennich spetsial’nostej s ispol’zovanijem orientirovanich proektov: anglijskij jazik, nejazikovoj vuz”, Tomsk, 2013, 27 s.

13. Protasova E.Y. Funktsional’naja pragmatika : variant psicholingvistiki ili obstchaja teorija jazikoznanija// Voprosi jazikoznanija, 1999, N1. S.142-155

14. Tokarev G.V. Diskursivnije liki kontsept: monogrqfija. Tula:Izd-vo Tul.Un-ta, 2004. 325 s.

15. Entsiklopeditcheskij sotsiologitcheskij slovar’. M.ISPI RN, 1995. 93 s.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?