VARIOUS APPROACHES TO DIFFERENTIAL RENT CATEGORY
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
In this paper it has been demonstrated that in modern economic science there is a large number of theoretical approaches, positions, and views on the differential rent category conceptualization, as well as on the methodology for determining its size and mechanisms of this rent withdrawal and distribution. The history of the classical views on the rent has been reported. It has been marked that after release of D. Worcester work “Rent Theory Revision” the extremely profitable concept of differential rent becomes more and more popular in economic circles, the rent starts to be considered as part of the profit and therefore its distribution between oil and gas companies and government becomes legitimate. In March of this year the “Drilling and Oil” journal published a paper “Arctic Oil and Gas Rents” (the authors A.V. Semenov, Yu.S. Rudenko, Yu.V. Razowski, Yu.N. Makarkin), where questions of differential rent, the interest to which has increased due to the upcoming development of Arctic fields, once again have being considered from the standpoint of super-profits. In connection therewith in this paper the author argues against the views published in the paper “Arctic Oil and Gas Rents” on the theoretical issues related to substance of differential rent, rental income classification, methods of rent size determining and options of rent withdrawal or distribution.

Keywords:
criticism, differential rent, natural conditions of mining, settlement price, settlement centers, polar payments, differential rent withdrawal mechanism, quasi-rent.
Text

В современной экономической науке существует достаточно большое число теоретических подходов, позиций и взглядов на осмысление категории «дифференциальная рента», а также методики определения ее размеров и механизмы ее изъятия и распределения. С выходом работы Д. Ворчестер «Пересмотр теории ренты» в экономических кругах все большую популярность находит «сверхприбыльная концепция дифференциальной ренты», рента начинает рассматриваться как часть прибыли и поэтому ее распределение между нефтегазовыми компаниями и государством вполне правомерно. Однако это не так. Дифференциальная рента выступает как доход от собственности на недра, полностью принадлежащий государству.

References

1. Glaz’ev S.U., Volkonsky V.A., Kuzovkin A.I., Mydretsov A.F. Metodika rascheta renti po osnovnim vidam poleznih iskopaemih. [The method of calculation of rent on major minerals]. Moscow, INES Publ., 2003. 56 p.

2. Goloskokov A.N. Podhodi k differentsiatsii nalogooblogenia gazoivoy otrasli. [Approaches to differentiation of taxation in the gas industry]. Neftegazovoe delo. [Oil and gas business.]. 2009, I. 2. Available at: http://www.ogbus.ru/authors/Goloskokov/Goloskokov_2.pdf/ (Accessed 12 September 2012).

3. Ikaev A.R. Typification of levels of formation of oil and gas rents. Vestnik yniuversiteta [Bulletin of the University.]. 2011, I. 23. pp.118. 120 p. (in Russian)

4. Kimelman S.A. Gornayaya i tysenovaya renta v covremennoy rossiyskoy ekonomike. [Mining and price rent in the modern Russian economy.] Available at: http.www. allrus.info›data…12/ennojrossijskojekonomike.doc/ (Accessed 12 September 2012).

5. Kimelman S.A. Sir’evoy sector ekonomiki Rossii: sostoyanie I vozmojnosti razvitiya. [Raw sector of economy of Russia: status and development opportunities.]. Ekonomika regiona. [The region´s economy.]. 2010, I. 4, pp. 173-182.

6. Marks. K., Engel’s F. Sochineniya. [Works.]. Moscow, Gospolitizdat Publ., 1968.

7. Marshall A. Printsipi ekonomicheskoy nauki. [The principles of economic science.]. Moscow, Univerz Publ., 1993.

8. Matveev U.F., Subbotin M.A. Rentniy podhod v nedropol’zovanii. [The rental approach in subsoil use.]. Moscow, NIA-PRIRODA Publ., 2003. 245 p.

9. Myasoedov S.A. Formirovanie mehanizma I instrymentov obespecherniya ystoichivogo razvitija zolotodobivaychey otrasli promishlennosti. Dokt. Diss. [The formation mechanism and tools to ensure sustainable development of the gold mining industry. Doct. Diss.]. Moscow, Institute of Economics and social relations Publ., 2010. 59 p.

10. Obchestvenno-neobhodimih. [Socially necessary] Available at: http://www.koefficienta.ru/enduratexter-material17modered-81-index.html/ (Accessed: 30 September 2012).

11. Razovsky U.V., Savel’eva E.U. Razvitie kloassifikatsii renti. [The development of the classification of rent.] Available at: http://www.viperson.ru›wind.php?ID=644833&soch=1/ (Accessed 27 September 2012.).

12. Semenov A.V., Rydenko U.S., Razovsky U.V., Makarkin U.N. Arkticheskaya neftegazovaya renta. [Arctic oil and gas rents.]. Byrenie I neft’ [Drilling and oil.]. 2015, I. 3. pp. 64-69.

13. Smit A. Issledovanie o prirode i prichinah bogatstva narodov. [An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of Nations], Moscow, Direktmedia Pablishing Publ., 2008. 657 p.

14. Chernjavsky S.V. Instrymenti pereraspredelenija rentnih dohodov (raschetnie tseni, poljarnie plateji). [The redistribution of rental income (the estimated price, the polar charges).]. Vestnik yniuversiteta [Bulletin of the University.]. 2013, I. 7, pp. 158-165.

15. Chernjavsky S.V. Kontseptsija reformirovanija differentsial’noy gornoy renti v neftedobivaushei promishlennosti Rossii. Dokt. Diss. [The concept of reforming the withdrawal of the mining rent differential in the oil industry of Russia. Doct. Diss.]. Moscow, GUU Publ., Available at: http://guu.ru/files/referate/2014/chernyavski_s_dis.pdf (Accessed 2 June 2015).

Login or Create
* Forgot password?