Russian Federation
Introduction. The article is devoted to the consideration of the world fund of aphoristic units as a unique example of the spiritual and mental globalization of people, regardless of their nationality and citizenship. National archives of aphorisms are the quintessence of the depth of human mental activity in the active contemplation of the world. They are a kind of universal supra-ethnic information archive of universal values and truths and are considered by us in the light of their intercultural significance as a means of smoothing national differences and bringing together different ethnic cultures. Aim. The purpose of the article is to show that national aphoristic archives can be seen as a positive example of cultural globalization and used as a means of smoothing out national differences and uniting different nations, cultures and countries. Met¬ho¬do¬logy and re¬se¬arch met¬hods. A comparative analysis of some collections of aphorisms and an analysis of the content side of aphoristic rhetoric were the main methods for achieving this goal. Results. The themes of aphorisms are not directly indicative of any specific period of human history and also do not have any pronounced ethnic specificity. Aphorisms mainly characterize a person as a Human, regardless of ethnicity, citizenship and historical eras, and proclaim universal human values. Scientific novelty. Aphorisms are considered as a unique example of the spiritual and mental globalization of people regardless of their nationality and citizenship in the light of their intercultural significance as a means of smoothing out national differences and bringing together different nations, cultures and countries. Practical significance. The world fund of aphoristic units is a universal supra-ethnic information archive of universal human values and truths, has a significant potential for smoothing out contradictions (ethnic, religious, gender, political, etc.) and can be used in all contexts of the modern world as a reconciling and harmonizing factor.
globalization, aphorism, national mentality, spiritual values
1. Bredis M.A., Dimoglo M.S., Lomakina O.V. Paremias in Modern Linguistics: Approaches to Study, Text-Forming and Linguistic and Cultural Potential. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Teoriya yazyka. Semiotika. Semantika [Bulletin of Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: Theory of language. Semiotics. Semantics], 2020, V. 11, no. 2, pp. 265-284. (in Russian)
2. Gavrin S.G. Aphoristic phraseology as a linguistic category. Uchenye zapiski PGPI [Scientific notes of PGPI], 1971, V. 87, pp. 3-23. (in Russian)
3. Vereshchagin E.M., Kostomarov V.G. YAzyk i kul'tura: tri lingvostranovedcheskih koncepcii: leksicheskogo fona, reche-povedencheskih taktik i sapientemy [Language and culture: three linguistic and cultural concepts: lexical background, speech-behavioral tactics and sapientema]. Moscow: Indrik Publ., 2005. 1037 p.
4. Ivanov E.E. Aphorism as an object of linguistics: main features. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Teoriya yazyka. Semiotika. Semantika [Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: Theory of language. Semiotics. Semantics], 2020, V. 11, no. 4, pp. 659-706. (in Russian) DOI:https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2020-11-4-659-706
5. Korolkova A.V. Russkaya aforistika [Russian aphorism]. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka Publ., 2005. 342 p.
6. Kunin A.V. Kurs frazeologii sovremennogo anglijskogo yazyka [Phraseology course of modern English]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola Publ., Dubna: "Phoenix" Publ., 1996. 380 p.
7. Lomakina O.V., Mokienko V.M. Winged wings in the modern cultural context. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Teoriya yazyka. Semiotika. Semantika [Bulletin of Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: Theory of language. Semiotics. Semantics], 2019, V. 10, no. 2, pp. 256-272. (in Russian)
8. Mechkovskaya N.B. Genres of aphoristics and gradation of statements according to the degree of idiomaticity. Genres of speech [ZHanry rechi], 2009, 6, pp. 79-111. (in Russian)
9. Nalichnikova I.A. Aphorism as a Genre, Small Text and Universal Statement. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Philological Sciences. Questions of theory and practice]. Tambov: Diploma Publ., 2016, no. 4 (58): in 3 parts, part 3, pp. 121-123. (in Russian)
10. Oganesyan S.S. On the concept of "universal values". Nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki. Sovremennaya kommunikativistika [Scientific research and development. Modern communication science], 2019, no. 6, pp. 44-49. (in Russian) DOIhttps://doi.org/10.12737/2587-9103-2019-44-49
11. Usoltsev D.E. Semantics of general cultural values of a Russian person. Nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki. Sovremennaya kommunikativistika [Scientific research and development. Modern communication science], 2015, no. 5, pp. 26-30. (in Russian) DOI https://doi.org/10.12737/13423
12. Fedorenko N.T., Sokolskaya L.I. Aforistika [Aphorism]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1990. 419 p.
13. Akramov I. The special characteristics of the aphorisms // IJORCES International journal of conference series on education and social sciences. 2022.Vol.2. No 1. Pp.88-93.
14. Cosmin B. The Aphorism: Function and Discursive Strategy // Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191. 2015. Pp.2267-2271. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.229
15. Geary J. The World in a Phrase: A Brief History of the Aphorism. New York: Bloomsbury, 2005.
16. Gray R.T. Constructive Destruction: Kafka's Aphorisms: Literary Tradition and Literary Transformation. Tubingen: Nieweyer, 1987.
17. Korolkova A., Novikova T. National culture in the context of globalization (on the material of aphoristics) // The scientific heritage. 2020. No. 56. Pp. 65-67.
18. Korolkova A., Novikova T., Terentyev S. Classical Russian aphorisms as a means of representing culture // The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2021. Pp. 844-851. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351646240_Classical_Russian_Aphorisms_As_A_Means_Of_Representing_Culture (accessed 06/14/2023).
19. Odyntsova H., Kondratieva T. Aphorisms as means of interpreting of linguistic terms // Folia linguistica et litteraria. 2022. 39. Pp.187-204 DOI:https://doi.org/10.31902/fll.39.2022.10
20. Sharmanova N. Differential Features of Aphorism as a Unit of Paremiology // Ukrainistyka. Kryvyi Rih: Vydavnytsvo Kryvorizkoho Derzhavnoho Pedahohichnoho Universytetu, 2002. 131- 135.
