Moscow, Moscow, Russian Federation
The relevance of the presented study lies in the fact that in today's variable geopolitical and economic conditions, business entities are forced to constantly look for rational management decisions in order to increase the efficiency of their activities. At the same time, in conditions of high market saturation, the search for rational management decisions by business entities in many cases lies in the area of solving optimization problems that imply reaching compromises with other market participants, the varying degree of success in achieving which can be described using the tools of cooperative, non-cooperative and hybrid games. The scientific novelty of the presented research lies in the formation of a model for determining the optimal variant of a managerial decision at the n-th step of the development strategy of the state as a player in the international space, in which the search for the maximum increment of the benefit of the state as a player in the international space is carried out from j options of a finite set of decisions at the n-th step development strategies in the triad of directions of cooperative, non-cooperative and hybrid games. The practical significance of the results obtained lies in the possibility of using the proposed model to solve a wide range of problems of making rational managerial decisions on the strategic development of socio-economic systems in modern geopolitical and economic conditions.
model, managerial decision-making, optimization of performance indicators, use of game theory, large-scale strategies, state development
1. Aumann R. Lectures on Game Theory. San Francisco: Westview Press, 1989. - 120 p.
2. Bierman H.S. Game Theory with Economic Applications. - Reading, MA: AddisonWesley, 1998. - 452 p.
3. Harsanyi, John C. (October 1953). "Cardinal utility in welfare economics and in the theory of risk-taking". Journal of Political Economy. 61 (5): 434-435.
4. Avinash Diksit, Bari Neylbaff Teoriya igr. Iskusstvo strategicheskogo myshleniya /per. s angl. N. Yacyuk. - M.: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 2015. - 387 s.
5. Vorob'ev N.N. Osnovy teorii igr. Beskoalicionnye igry. M.: Nauka, 1984. - 272s.
6. Gubko M.V. Teoriya igr v upravlenii organizacionnymi sistemami. M.: Sinteg, 2005. - 368 s.
7. Dubina I.N. Osnovy teorii igr i ee prilozheniya v ekonomike i menedzhmente. -Barnaul: izd-vo Alt. un-ta, 2013. - 312 s.
8. Evroparlament anonsiroval vozmozhnoe priyatie novogo paketa antirossiyskih sankciy v aprele. https://www.mk.ru/politics/2023/04/10/evroparlament-anonsiroval-vozmozhnoe-priyatie-novogo-paketa-antirossiyskikh-sankciy-v-aprele.html
9. Mazalov V.V. Matematicheskaya teoriya igr i prilozheniya. Spb.: Lan', 2016. - 448 s.
10. Neyman Dzh. fon, Morgenshtern O. Teoriya igr i ekonomicheskoe povedenie. M.: Nauka, 1970. - 708 s.
11. Ouen, Gil'ermo. Teoriya igr: igry dvuh lic s zadaniyami, igry n lic / G. Ouen; per. s angl. I. N. Vrublevskoy, G. N. Dyubina, A. N. Lyapunova; pod red. A. A. Korbuta. - Izd. vtoroe. - Moskva: URSS, 2004. - 230 s.
12. Petrosyan L.A., Zenkevich N.A., Semina E.A. Teoriya igr: Ucheb. posobie dlya un-tov - M.: Vyssh. shk., Knizhnyy dom «Universitet», 1998. - 304 c.
13. Tebekin A.V. MESTO I ROL' METODOV TEORII ISSLEDOVANIYa OPERACIY V SISTEME METODOV PRINYaTIYa OPTIMAL'NYH UPRAVLENChESKIH REShENIY. // Zhurnal tehnicheskih issledovaniy. 2021. T. 7. № 3. S. 3-21.
14. Tebekin A.V. METODY PRINYaTIYa UPRAVLENChESKIH REShENIY NA OSNOVE OPTIMIZACII POKAZATELEY EFFEKTIVNOSTI S ISPOL'ZOVANIEM KOOPERATIVNYH IGR. // Zhurnal issledovaniy po upravleniyu. 2018. T. 4. № 11. S. 39-53.
15. Tebekin A.V. METODY PRINYaTIYa UPRAVLENChESKIH REShENIY NA OSNOVE OPTIMIZACII POKAZATELEY EFFEKTIVNOSTI S ISPOL'ZOVANIEM NEKOOPERATIVNYH IGR. // Zhurnal issledovaniy po upravleniyu. 2019. T. 5. № 1. S. 48-64.
16. Tebekin A.V. METODY PRINYaTIYa UPRAVLENChESKIH REShENIY NA OSNOVE TEORII IGR KAK GRUPPA METODOV KLASSA PRINYaTIYa STRATEGIChESKIH REShENIY NA OSNOVE OPTIMIZACII POKAZATELEY EFFEKTIVNOSTI. // Strategii biznesa. 2018. № 10 (54). S. 3-12.
17. Tebekin A.V. METODY PRINYaTIYa UPRAVLENChESKIH REShENIY. Uchebnik / Moskva, 2020. Ser. 76 Vysshee obrazovanie (1-e izd.) - 431 c.
18. Tebekin A.V., Anisimov E.G. O FRONTAH GIBRIDNOY VOYNY V EKONOMIChESKOM I GEOPOLITIChESKOM PROSTRANSTVE. // Zhurnal issledovaniy po upravleniyu. 2020. T. 6. № 5. S. 60-74.
19. Tebekin A.V., Mitropol'skaya-Rodionova N.V., Horeva A.V. VOZMOZhNOSTI I PERSPEKTIVY ISPOL'ZOVANIYa POLOZhENIY KOGNITIVNOY ShKOLY STRATEGIChESKOGO MENEDZhMENTA V SOVREMENNYH GEOPOLITEKONOMIChESKIH USLOVIYaH. // Zhurnal issledovaniy po upravleniyu. 2022. T. 8. № 3. S. 23-38.
20. Tebekin A.V., Tebekin P.A. KLASSIFIKACIYa METODOV PRINYaTIYa UPRAVLENChESKIH REShENIY NA OSNOVE OPTIMIZACII POKAZATELEY EFFEKTIVNOSTI. // Zhurnal issledovaniy po upravleniyu. 2018. T. 4. № 4. S. 13-24.
21. Tebekin A.V., Tebekin P.A. METODY PRINYaTIYa UPRAVLENChESKIH REShENIY NA OSNOVE OPTIMIZACII POKAZATELEY EFFEKTIVNOSTI S ISPOL'ZOVANIEM GIBRIDNYH IGR. // Zhurnal issledovaniy po upravleniyu. 2019. T. 5. № 2. S. 34-47.
22. Eksport i import: zhizn' v novyh usloviyah. https://plus.rbc.ru/news/631359b67a8aa98521ceb3a2
