Russian Federation
This article analyzes pilot studies of personnel risks, professional motivation and organizational closeness. All studies relate to significant problems in the field of human resource management of modern organizations. The novelty of this work is determined by the strategy of personnel analysis not as an object of managerial influence, but as an active subject in the system of organizational relations. The study of the organization from the standpoint of the subjective perceptions of the employees made it possible to identify a separate type of personnel risk due to the personality and thinking of the employee. The developed methodology for assessing subjective risks in an organization made it possible to identify areas of uncertainty in the subjective perceptions of personnel about the organization as sources of potential conflicts and security threats. The study of professional motivation shows the complexity of the structure of professional motivation of staff, which is specifically regulated by the functions of locomotion and evaluation. The analysis of the perception of the closedness of the organization found that certain management practices will contribute to the closeness of the new experience among employees, the rejection of organizational changes and a decrease in job satisfaction. The article defines the practical significance of each empirical study. The conclusions discuss the possibility of training an extended strategy for researching the personnel of organizations of future specialists and managers, as well as the relevance of the tasks of effective human resource management.
human resource management, subjective perceptions, personnel risks, professional motivation, organizational closeness, commercial organization
1. Gluhanyuk N. S._ Yurtaeva M. N. & Berseneva_ E. I. Vozmojnosti metoda semanticheskogo differenciala dlya ocenki personala _na primere HR_brendinga organizacii Upravlenie personalom i intellektualnimi resursami v Rossii [Management of the personnel and intellectual resources in Russia] 2022. V. 11, I. 2, p. 83-88. (in Russian) OIhttps://doi.org/10.12737/2305-7807-2022-11-2-83-88
2. Egorova M.S., Sitnikova M.A., Parshikova O.V. Adaptaciya Korotkogo oprosnika Temnoj triady. Psihologicheskie issledovaniya, 2015, vol. 8, no. 43. Available at: http:// psystudy. 2015, vol. 8, no. 43. Available at: https://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/article/view/1052 (Accessed 9 March 2023)
3. Ivanova T.YU., Osin E.N., Rasskazova E.I. Struktura i diagnostika udovletvorennosti trudom: razrabotka i aprobaciya metodiki Organizacionnaya psihologiya [Organizational psychology]. 2012. V. 2, I. 3, p. 2-15. (in Russian)
4. Mitrofanova A.E. Upravlpenie kadrovymi riskami v rabote s personalom organizacii Cand, Diss, Avt, [Management of personnel risks in work with the personnel of the organization]. Moscow, 2013.28 p. (in Russian)
5. Najt F. Risk, neopredelennost' i pribyl'. Moscow, Delo publ., 2003. 360 p.
6. Osin E. N., Gorbunova A. A., Gordeeva T. O., Ivanova T. YU., Kosheleva N. V., Ovchinnikova (Mandrikova) E. YU. Professional'naya motivaciya sotrudnikov rossijskih predpriyatij: diagnostika i svyazi s blagopoluchiem i uspeshnost'yu deyatel'nosti Organizacionnaya psihologiya, 2017., vol. 7, no. 4. Available at: Available at: http:// https://orgpsyjournal.hse.ru/2017-7-4/213472437.html (Accessed 9 March 2023)
7. Prigozhin A.I. Metody razvitiya organizacij [Methods of organization development]. Moscow, Lenand publ., 2017. 848 p. (in Russian)
8. Radina N.K. Social'no-psihologicheskij fenomen «zakrytosti» M.YU.Kondrat'eva ot «zakrytoj gruppy» - k «zakrytomu obshchestvu» Social'naya psihologiya i obshchestvo [Social psychology and society]. 2016. V. 1, p. 45-58. (in Russian)
9. Skotnikova I. G. Paradigma veroyatnostnogo prognozirovaniya v psihologii // Poznanie i perezhivanie. 2021. V. 2, I. 2, p. 6-27. (in Russian) DOI: 10.51217/ cogexp_2021_02_02_01. (in Russian)
10. Simanyuk E.E. Professionalnii opit kak psihologicheskii barer professionalnogo razvitiya personala Upravlenie personalom i intellektualnimi resursami v Rossii [Management of the personnel and intellectual resources in Russia] 2013. V. 2, I. 5, p. 63-66. (in Russian) DOIhttps://doi.org/10.12737/1388
11. Kruglanski A. Individual Differences in Need for Cognitive Closure // Journal of Personality and Social Psichology. 1994.67(6). P. 1049-62. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.67.6.1049.
12. Kruglanski A. W., Webster D. M., & Klem A. Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.1993. 65(5). P. 861-876. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.861
13. Kruglanski, A. W., Thompson, E. P., Higgins, E. T., Atash, M. N., Pierro, A., Shah, J. Y., & Spiegel, S. To "do the right thing" or to "just do it": Locomotion and assessment as distinct self-regulatory imperatives // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2000. 79(5). P. 793- 815. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.79
