Age differences of pine stands as a factor of harmonization of the system of forest management activities in ribbon forests of the Altai Krai
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The ratio of the same- and uneven-aged pine forests in various types of ribbon forests in Altai Krai, as well as the patterns of forming natural pine plantations, is determined. This issue is important for the harmonization of the entire set of forest management activities in the study area. The research is based on the analysis of an electronic database that contains information on the forest fund of 11 forest districts in Altai Krai (more than 268 thousand stratums with a total area of 1014 thousand ha). With the help of queries using filters and summary tables, a sample of natural plantations with a predominance of Scotch pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) was obtained. For each plantation in the sample, the number of age generations and the distributions of the area of the same- and uneven-aged pine forests by forest districts, forest types, and quality classes were determined. Statistical data processing included cluster analysis and chi-squared test. Pine forests of natural origin in the study area consist mainly of 2-3 pine generations. The share of uneven-aged forest stands accounts for 79.6% of the area. Same-aged pine forests occupy 20.4% of the area. During the transition from damp to very dry growing conditions, the proportion of uneven-aged pine forests increases. In the future it is planned to improve the existing systems of improvement thinning in mature, declining stands of forest-steppes and ribbon forests in the Altai-Novosibirsk forest growing district considering the ratio of the same- and uneven-aged pine forests. The improvement of the system of forest management activities should be performed on a forest-typological basis in combination with the division of plantings into high- and low-quality.

Keywords:
Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.), age generation, uneven-aged forest stand, ribbon forest, forest type, quality class, area
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Anan'ev V.A., Sin'kevich S.M. Obosnovanie vedeniya hozyaystva v zaschitnyh lesah Zelenogo poyasa Fennoskandii s sohraneniem ekosistemnyh funkciy. Trudy Karel'skogo nauchnogo centra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. 2019;4:182-189. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17076/them1008

2. Bashegurov K. A., Zalesova E. S., Tolstikov A. Yu., Usov M. V. Posledstviya gruppovo-vyborochnyh rubok v sosnyakah lentochnyh borov Altaya. Uspehi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya. 2019;9:13-18. Rezhim dostupa: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=40535914

3. Bashegurov K. A., Malinovskih A. A., Savin M. A., Godovalov G. A. Specifika nakopleniya podrosta na garyah v razlichnyh lesorastitel'nyh podzonah lentochnyh borov Altaya. Lesa Rossii i hozyaystvo v nih. 2020;1(72):4-14. Rezhim dostupa: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43806599

4. Belov L. A., Klyam O. A., Suraev P. N. Vliyanie vyborochnyh rubok na podrost predvaritel'noy generacii v sosnyakah yagodnikovogo tipa lesa. Lesa Rossii i hozyaystvo v nih. 2022;1(80):37-47. DOI: http://doi.org/10.51318/FRET.2021.65.76.004

5. Behovyh Yu. V., Bolotov A. G. Sravnitel'nyy analiz produktivnyh zapasov vlagi dernovo-podzolistyh pochv lentochnyh borov Altayskogo kraya v zonah zasushlivoy i suhoy stepi. Vestnik Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2012;2(88):42-46. Rezhim dostupa: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17356629

6. Debkov N. M., Kuzmenkin D. V., Gribkov A. V., Pozhidaeva L. V. O predel'nom vozraste sosny obyknovennoy i ee drevostoev v lentochnyh borah Altayskogo kraya. Ustoychivoe lesopol'zovanie. 2021;1(65):53-61. DOI: http://doi.org/10.47364/2308-541X_2021_65_1_53

7. Zheldak V. I., Malenko A. A., Martynyuk A. A., Sidorenkov V. M., Lyamcev N. I., Korshunov N. A., Koryakin V. A., Ryabcev O. V., Malinovskih A. A., Doroschenkova E. V., Konyushenkov M. E., Kursikova E. S., Sidorenkova E. M., Trushina I. G., Trushina N. I. Lentochnye bory i vedenie hozyaystva v nih: monogr. / Pod obsch. red. chl.-korr. RAN A. A. Martynyuka. Pushkino: VNIILM. 2022:216. ISBN 978-5-94219-280-8 Rezhim dostupa: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=50262485

8. Zalesov S. V. Bachurina A. V., Bachurina S. V. Sostoyanie sosnovyh nasazhdeniy posle pervogo priema rubok obnovleniya. Vestnik Bashkirskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2015;1(33):105-109. Rezhim dostupa: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23478273

9. Zalesova E. S., Zalesov S. V., Tolstikov A. Yu., Usov M. V., Shubin D. A. Kombinirovannye vyborochnye rubki v zaschitnyh lesah. Aktual'nye problemy lesnogo kompleksa. 2017;47:19-22. Rezhim dostupa: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29196612

10. Kulagina V. V. Sovremennoe sostoyanie Barnaul'skogo lentochnogo bora. Geografiya i prirodopol'zovanie Sibiri. 2016;22:76-81. Rezhim dostupa: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32574603

11. Kutyavin I. N., Manov A. V., Osipov A. F., Kuznecov M. A. Stroenie drevostoev severotaezhnyh sosnyakov. Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniy. Lesnoy zhurnal. 2021;2(380):86-105. DOI: http://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2021-2-86-105

12. Malinovskih A. A., Malenko A. A. Process estestvennogo vozobnovleniya sosny obyknovennoy posle vyborochnyh rubok v spelyh i perestoynyh nasazhdeniyah v lentochnyh borah Altayskogo kraya. Vestnik Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2018;1(159):67-72. Rezhim dostupa: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32357639

13. Malinovskih A. A., Malenko A. A. Vliyanie zhivogo napochvennogo pokrova na process estestvennogo vozobnovleniya sosny obyknovennoy posle rubok v spelyh i perestoynyh nasazhdeniyah v lentochnyh borah Altayskogo kraya. Vestnik Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2017;12(158):58-64. Rezhim dostupa: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30677132

14. Martynyuk A. A., Rodin S. A., Ryabcev O. V Innovacionnomu razvitiyu net al'ternativy. Lesohozyaystvennaya informaciya. 2019;3:7-20. DOI: http://doi.org/10.24419/LHI.2304-3083.2019.3.01

15. Martynyuk A.A., Sidorenkov V.M., Zheldak V.I., Lyamcev N.I., Ryabcev O.V., Zhafyarov A.V. Lentochnye bory Altayskogo kraya - sostoyanie i sovershenstvovanie hozyaystva v nih. Lesohozyaystvennaya informaciya. 2019;1:33-48. DOI: http://doi.org/10.24419/LHI.2304-3083.2019.1.03

16. Muhin A. K. Osobennosti dinamiki lishaynikovyh sosnyakov v usloviyah podtopleniya Rybinskim vodohranilischem. Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniy. Lesnoy zhurnal. 2022;4:52-69. DOI: http://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2022-4-52-69

17. Osipenko A. E., Zalesov S. V., Belov L. A., Shubin D. A. Rost po vysote i diametru sosnovyh drevostoev v Zapadno-Sibirskom podtaezhno-lesostepnom rayone Altayskogo kraya. Lesohozyaystvennaya informaciya. 2019;1:56-66. DOI: http://doi.org/10.24419/LHI.2304-3083.2019.1.05

18. Osipenko A. E., Osipenko R. A., Zalesov S. V. Vozrastnaya struktura sosnovyh drevostoev v Altae-Novosibirskom rayone lesostepey i lentochnyh borov. Lesohozyaystvennaya informaciya. 2020;3:89-100. DOI: http://doi.org/10.24419/LHI.2304-3083.2020.3.08

19. Osipenko A.E. Rost i razvitie iskusstvennyh i estestvennyh sosnovyh drevostoev v Altae-Novosibirskom rayone lesostepey i lentochnyh borov: dis. ... kand. s.-h. nauk: 06.03.02. Ekaterinburg. 2020:195. Rezhim dostupa: https://usfeu.ru/media/filer_public/c0/14/c014a970-123c-44f0-ad45-c91159d8dde6/dissertatsia_osipenko_-_okonch.pdf

20. Paramonov E. G. Lesovozobnovitel'naya rol' dobrovol'no-vyborochnyh rubok v lentochnyh borah Altaya. Lesnoe hozyaystvo. 2015;2:16-17. Rezhim dostupa: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29225547

21. Paramonov E. G. Ekologicheskie meropriyatiya v celyah lesovosstanovleniya v lentochnyh borah Altayskogo kraya. Mir nauki, kul'tury, obrazovaniya. 2014;2(45):396-399. Rezhim dostupa: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21507215

22. Paramonov E. G., Rybkina I. D. Lentochnye bory Altaya v period potepleniya klimata. Ustoychivoe lesopol'zovanie. 2017;3(51):33-39. Rezhim dostupa: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=34958211.

23. Sal'nikova I. S., Vorob'eva T. S., Nagimov Z. Ya., Zubova S. S., Orehova O. N., Suslov A. V. Taksaciya lesa. Hod rosta nasazhdeniy. Ekaterinburg: UGLTU. 2020:130. Rezhim dostupa: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44847425

24. Sidelev S. I. Matematicheskie metody v biologii i ekologii: vvedenie v elementarnuyu biometriyu. Yaroslavl': YarGU. 2012:138. Rezhim dostupa: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19503498

25. Tolstikov A. Yu. Lesovodstvennaya effektivnost' vyborochnyh rubok spelyh i perestoynyh nasazhdeniy i specializirovannyh rubok uhoda v lentochnyh borah Altayskogo kraya: dis. ... kand. s.-h. nauk: 06.03.02. Ekaterinburg. 2019:162. Rezhim dostupa: https://usfeu.ru/media/filer_public/e9/7c/e97c792f-2751-447a-85a1-5f60866099e3/dissertatsiia_tolstikov.pdf

26. Usov M. V., Zalesov S. V., Shubin D. A., Tolstikov A. Yu., Belov L. A. Perspektivnost' primeneniya cherespolosnyh postepennyh rubok v sosnyakah Altaya. Agrarnyy vestnik Urala. 2017;1(155):44-48. Rezhim dostupa: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29027521

27. Aakala T. Forest fire histories and tree age structures in Värriö and Maltio Strict Nature Reserves, northern Finland. Boreal Environment Research. 2018;23:209-219. URL: https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/298938

28. Adámek, M., Hadincová, V., Wild, J. Long-term effect of wildfires on temperate Pinus sylvestris for-ests: Vegetation dynamics and ecosystem resilience. Forest Ecology and Management, 2016;380:285-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.08.051

29. Čugunovs M., Nikodemus O., Dauškane I., Brūmelis G. The colonization history of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) in pristine and drained raised bogs in Latvia. Environmental and Experimental Biology. 2016;14(2):97-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22364/eeb.14.14

30. Dang H., Han H., Zhang X., Chen S., Li M., Liu C. Key Strategies Underlying the adaptation of Mongoli-an scots pine (Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica) in sandy land under climate change: a review. Forests. 2022;13(6)846. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f13060846

31. Ducey, M.J.; Gunn, J.S.; Whitman, A.A. Late-Successional and Old-Growth Forests in the Northeastern United States: Structure, Dynamics, and Prospects for Restoration. Forests. 2013;4:1055-1086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f4041055

32. Duncker P. S., Barreiro S. M., Hengeveld G. M., Lind T., Mason W. L., Ambrozy S., Spiecker, H. Classi-fication of Forest Management Approaches: A New Conceptual Framework and Its Applicability to European Forestry. Ecology and Society. 2012;17(4):51. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/26269224

33. Fahey R. T., Lorimer C. G. Persistence of pine species in late-successional forests: evidence from habi-tat-related variation in stand age structure. Journal of vegetation science. 2014;25(2):584-600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12091

34. Kitenberga M., Drobyshev I., Elferts D., Matisons R., Adamovics A., Katrevics J., Niklasson M., Jan-sons A. A mixture of human and climatic effects shapes the 250-year long fire history of a semi-natural pine dominated landscape of Northern Latvia. Forest Ecology and Management. 2019;441:192-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.03.020

35. Kuuluvainen T., Nummi P. Strategies for the Ecological Restoration of the Boreal Forest Facing Climate Change. Boreal Forests in the Face of Climate Change: Sustainable Management. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 2023:443-466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15988-6

36. Lundqvist L., Ahlström M. A., Petter Axelsson E., Mörling T., Valinger E. Multi-layered Scots pine for-ests in boreal Sweden result from mass regeneration and size stratification. Forest Ecology and Management. 2019;441:176-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.03.044

37. McDowell N. G., Allen C. D., Anderson-Teixeira K., Aukema B. H., Bond-Lamberty B., Chini L., Clark J. S., Dietze M., Grossiord C., Hanbury-Brown A., Hurtt G. C., Jackson R. B., Johnson D. J., Kueppers L., Lichstein J. W., Ogle K., Poulter B., Pugh T. A. M., Seidl R., Turner M. G., Uriarte M., Walker A. P., Xu C. Pervasive shifts in forest dynamics in a changing world. Science. 2020;368(6494):eaaz9463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz9463

38. Ribeiro S., Cerveira A., Soares P., Fonseca T. Natural regeneration of maritime pine: A review of the in-fluencing factors and proposals for management. Forests. 2022;13(3):386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f13030386

39. Sandström J., Edman M., Jonsson B. G. Rocky pine forests in the High Coast Region in Sweden: Struc-ture, dynamics and history. Nature Conservation. 2020;38:101-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.38.34870

40. Song, L., Zhu, J., Li, M., Zhang J., Li D. Water use strategies of natural Pinus sylvestris var. Mongolica trees of different ages in Hulunbuir Sandy Land of Inner Mongolia, China, based on stable isotope analysis. Trees. 2018;32:1001-1011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-018-1691-2

41. Taeger S., Zang C., Liesebach M., Schneck V., Menzel A. Impact of climate and drought events on the growth of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) provenances. Forest Ecology and Management. 2013;307:30-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.06.053


Login or Create
* Forgot password?