THE ROLE OF POPULIST DISCOURSE IN AN AGONISTIC MODEL OF CONFLICTUAL POLITICAL INTERACTION
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Populist discourse plays an important role in contemporary politics, as it is a way to mobilize broad sections of the population and build mass support for political action. However, populism is not only demagogy, as is commonly believed. It is also a specific form of mentality that is based on social antagonism. The article aims to provide a conceptual explanation of populism, which will not only be reduced to a political technology, such as demagogy, but will also allow to expand the knowledge of populism within populist discourse. The article provides a conceptual analysis of populist discourse from the perspective of communicative approach and agonistic discourse. Particular attention is paid to the causes of populism, which is built on social contrasts, what kind of antagonisms it uses and to what extent they influence the public mood. It is suggested that this view of populism will allow us to approach the question of defining the discourse of populism and to determine the role of (conflict) communication in the construction of an agonistic model of conflictual political interaction. The article can help to better understand the agonistic model of conflictual political interaction. Study of the social antagonisms used in populist discourse and an analysis of their impact on public attitudes can clarify the mechanisms of conflict and suggest ways to resolve them within the agonistic model.

Keywords:
populism, conflict communication, antagonism, agonism, discourse, agonistic model
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download

 

 
References

1. Afanasyev V.V. Karl Schmitt: iz istorii politicheskoi mysli [Karl Schmitt: From the History of Political thought]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia [Sociological research]. 2014, №. 6, pp. 68-76. (In Russian).

2. Baysha O.A. Diskursivnyi razlom sotsialnogo polya: Uroki Evromaidana: monografiya [A Discursive Fracture of the Social Field: The Lessons of the Euromaidan]. Nats. issled. un-t "Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki". M: Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly Ekonomiki, 2021. 184 p. (Politicheskaya teoriya). 1000 ekz. ISBN 978-5-7598-2371-1 (v per.). ISBN 978-5-7598-2278-3 (e-book). (In Russian).

3. Baranov N.A. Vozrozhdenie populizma: evropeiskii opyt i rossiiskie praktiki [The revival of populism: european experience and russian practices]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Politologiya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations]. 2015, I. 3, pp. 25-36. (In Russian).

4. Baranov N.A. Populizm kak politicheskaya deyatelnost [Populism as a political activity]. Available at: https://nicbar.ru/home/nauchnye-raboty/448-baranov-n-a-populizm-kak-politicheskaya-deyatelnost (Accessed: 12.04.2023). (In Russian).

5. Baranov N.A. Evolyutsiya vzglyadov na populizm v sovremennoi politicheskoi nauke [The evolution of views on populism in contemporary political science]. Available at: https://nicbar.ru/home/nauchnye-raboty/447-baranov-n-a-evolyutsiya-vzglyadov-na-populizm-v-sovremennoj-politicheskoj-nauke-nauchnoe-izdanie. (Accessed: 12.04.2023). (In Russian).

6. Beylin M.V. Populizm kak fragmentarnaya ideologiya i tekhnologiya manipulyatsii [Populism as a fragmentary ideology and manipulation technology]. Bolshaya Evraziya: razvitie, bezopasnost', sotrudnichestvo [Greater Eurasia: development, security, cooperation]. 2018, I. 1-2, pp. 42-45. (In Russian).

7. Beresneva Yu.V. Stanovlenie ponyatiya « kommunikatsiya » v sotsial'no-gumanitarnom poznanii: soderzhanie, struktura, funktsii kommunikatsii [The Formation of the Concept “Communication” in Social-Humanitarian Knowledge: Content, Structure and Functions of Communication]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofskie nauki [Bulletin of Moscow Region State University. Series: Philosophy]. 2017. I. 4. pp. 6-20. (In Russian).

8. Bogapova A.V. POPULIZM: OT DIKHOTOMICHESKOGO K GRADUIROVANNOMU OSMY SLENIYU [POPULISM: FROM DICHOTOMIC TO GRADUATED MEANING]. Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki [Bulletin of Tula State University]. 2022, I. 1, pp. 73-77. (In Russian).

9. Bogapova A.V. Prezidentskaya predvybornaya kampaniya-2018: populizm v politicheskikh diskursakh kandidatov [2018 Presidential Election Campaign: Populism in Candidates Political Discourses]. Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Politologiya. Religiovedenie [The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Political Science and Religion Studies], 2021, vol. 37, pp. 9-18. https://doi.org/10.26516/2073-3380.2021.37.9. (In Russian).

10. Vainstein G.I. Sovremennyi populizm kak ob"ekt politologicheskogo analiza [Modern Populism as a Subject of Political Science]. Polis: Journal of Political Studies [Polis. Political Studies] 2017, I. 4. pp. 69-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.04.06. (In Russian).

11. Glukhov A.A. Perekhlest volny. Politicheskaya logika Platona i postnitscheanskoe preodolenie platonizma [Overlapping Waves. Political Logic of Plato and the Post-Nietzschean Overcoming of Platonism]. A. A. Glukhov; Nats. issled. un-t "Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki". - M.: Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2014, 584 p. - (Politicheskaya teoriya). 1000 ekz. ISBN 978-5-7598-1078-0 (v per.). (In Russian).

12. Glukhova A.V. Populizm v XXI veke: vremenno, nadolgo, navsegda? [Populism in the 21st century: Today, tomorrow, always?]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 25. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya i mirovaya politika [Moscow University Bulletin of World Politics] 2021, Vol. 13. I. 2. pp. 33-61. (In Russian).

13. Dmitriev T. Spor ob osnovakh politicheskogo: Leo Shtraus versus Karl Schmitt [The debate about the foundations of the political; or, Leo Strauss versus Carl Schmitt]. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie [The Russian Sociological Review]. 2012. 3. pp. 26-40. (In Russian).

14. Zhdanov Yu.A. Antagonizm i protivorechie: k voprosu ob analize obshchestvennykh otnoshenii [Antagonism and contradiction: on the issue of analysis of public relations]. Gumanitarii Yuga Rossii [HUMANITIES OF THE SOUTH OF RUSSIA]. 2019, Vol. 8 (39) I. 5 pp. 16-30. (In Russian).

15. Zvolev N.P. Ernesto Laklau o populizme kak suschnosti politicheskogo [Ernesto Laclau on populism as the essence of the political]. Vestnik Instituta Mirovykh Tsivilizatsii [Bulletin of the Institute of World Civilizations]. 2017., I. 15-1. pp. 71-74. (In Russian).

16. Losev A.F. Kommentarii k dialogam Platona. Kompilyatsiya iz chetyrekhtomnogo izdaniya dialogov Platona [Comments on Plato's dialogues. Compilation from the four-volume edition of Plato's dialogues]. Available at: http://psylib.org.ua/books/losew06/txt19.htm (Accessed: 15.04.2023). (In Russian).

17. Lotman Yu.M. Semiosfera. Kultura i vzryv. Vnutri myslayushchikh mirov. Stat'i. Issledovaniya. Zametki [The semiosphere. Culture and explosion. Inside the thinking worlds. Articles. Researches. Notes]. SPb.: Iskusstvo-SPb., 2001, p. 703. (In Russian).

18. Musikhin G.I. Ocherki teorii ideologii [Essays on the Theory of Ideologies] / Nats. issled. un-t "Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki". M.: Izd. dom Vysheĭ shkoly ekonomiki, 2013., p. 288 (Politicheskaya teoriya), 1000 ekz., ISBN 978-5-7598-1012-4 (v per.). Monografiya. (In Russian).

19. Musikhin G.I. Populism: structure feature of politics or thin ideology? [Populizm: strukturnaya kharakteristika politiki ili «ushcherbnaya ideologiya»?]. Zhurnal politicheskoi filosofii i sotsiologii politiki «Politiya. Analiz. Khronika. Prognoz». [Politiya]. 2009, pp. 40-53. (In Russian).

20. Muff Sh. K agonisticheskoi modeli demokratii [An agonistic model of democracy]. Logos. 2004, V. 2, I. 42, pp. 180-197. (In Russian).

21. Müller, Ya.-V «Chto takoe populizm? [What is populism?] / per. s angl. A. Arkhipovoĭ; pod nauch. red. A. Smirnova»: Izdatel'skiĭ dom Vyssheĭ shkoly ekonomiki; Moskva; 2018 ISBN 978-5-7598-1710-9, 978-5-7598-1697-3. (In Russian).

22. Pain E.A., Fedyunin S.Yu. Populizm i elitizm v sovremennoi Rossii: analiz vzaimosvyazi [Populism and elitism in contemporary Russia]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies]. 2019, I. 1. p. 33-48. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.01.04. (In Russian).

23. Perevozchikov M.S. Populizm kak destabiliziruyushchiy faktor politicheskoy sistemy [Populism as a destabilizing factor of the political system]. Ustoychivost' politicheskikh sistem v usloviyakh global'nykh vyzovov sovremennosti: Sbornik tezisov XI. [stability of political systems in the context of global challenges of our time. Collection of abstracts]. 2021, p. 275. (In Russian).

24. Podrezov M.V. Istoriya izucheniya politicheskogo populizma i ego sovremennoe polozhenie v politicheskoy nauke [The History of the Study of Political Populism and Its Current Position in Political Science] Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Tomsk State University Journal]. 2020, pp. 96-101. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/451/13. (In Russian).

25. Potseluev S.P. Ot «antagonizma» k «agonizmu»: k teorii demokratii E. Laklau i Sh. Muff [From "antagonism" to "agonism": on the theory of democracy by E. Laklau and S. Muff]. Politicheskaya konceptologiya [The political conceptology: journal of metadisciplinary research]. 2011. I. 2. p. 73. (In Russian).

26. Rusakova O.F. Osnovnye raznovidnosti sovremennykh teoriy politicheskogo diskursa: opyt klassifikatsiy [The main varieties of modern theories of political discourse: the experience of classifications]. Politeks. Politicheskaya ekspertiza [Political expertise: POLITEX]. 2006. I. 3. pp. 191-212. (In Russian).

27. Savin N. Poryvaya s Karlom Shmittom: ponyatie politicheskogo v teorii agonisticheskogo plyuralizma [Breaking with Carl Schmitt: the Concept of the Political in Chantal Mouffe’s Agonistic Pluralism]. Filosofsko-literaturnyy zhurnal «Logos» [Philosophical and Literary Journal “Logos”]. 2015. V. 25. I. 6 (108). pp. 163-179. (In Russian).

28. Samartsev V.Yu. Kriticheskiy diskurs-analiz rechevykh strategiy politicheskogo diskursa D. Trampa (na materiale prezidentskikh debatov SSHA 2016 goda) [Critical Discourse Analysis of Speech Strategies Employed by D. Trump During the First Presidential Debate of 2016]. Politicheskaya lingvistika [Political Linguistics]. 2021. I. 2, (86), pp. 116-126. (In Russian).

29. Slobodyanik N.B. Konstruirovanie identichnosti v politicheskom diskurse: k voprosu o roli sotsial'nogo antagonizma (o kontseptsii politicheskogo diskursa Laklau i Muff) [Constructing Identity in Political Discourse: on the role of Social Antagonism (on the concept of Political Discourse by Laclau and Mouff)]. Politicheskaya lingvistika [Political Linguistics]. 2007, I. 22, pp. 60-66. (In Russian).

30. Stefanchikov I.V. Populizm kak politicheskaya strategiya (na primere diskursa partii «Podemos») [Populism as a political strategy (on the example of the discourse of the Podemos Party)] Stephanos [Stephanos]. 2016., №. 3., pp. 252-260. (In Russian).

31. Fishman L.G. Populizm - eto nadolgo [Populism will be long lasting]. Polis: Journal of Political Studies [Polis: Journal of Political Studies]. 2017., I. 3. p. 55-70. (In Russian).

32. Kharitonova O.G., Kudryashova I.V. Politicheskie rezhimy i rezhimnye izmeneniya v pene populistkoy volny [Political regimes and regime changes in the foam of the populist wave]. Politicheskaya nauka [Political science]. 2022, I. 1, pp. 224-244. (In Russian).

33. Shakleina T.A. Donald Tramp i “novyy populizm” v Amerike [Donald Trump and “new populism” in America]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies]. 2021, I. 5. pp. 176-183. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2021.05.12. (In Russian).

34. Yakovlev P.P., Yakovleva N.M. Latinoamerikanskiy populizm: istoricheskiy kontekst i sovremennye trendy [Latin American Populism: historical context and modern trends]. Iberoamerikanskie tetradi [Cuadernos Iberoamericanos]. 2022, V. 10., I. 1., pp. 10-26. (In Russian).

35. Aslanidis P. Measuring populist discourse with semantic text analysis: an application on grassroots populist mobilization //Quality & Quantity. 2018, V. 52. I. 3., pp. 1241-1263.

36. Bernhard L, Kriesi H. Populism in election times: a comparative analysis of 11 countries in Western Europe // West European Politics. 2019. No 42 (6). P. 1188-1208.

37. Canovan M. Two strategies for the study of populism //Political studies. 1982, V. 30, I. 4., pp. 544-552.

38. Laclau E. On populist reason. Verso, 2005.

39. Laclau E. The rhetorical foundations of society. Verso Books, 2014.

40. Laclau E. Towards a theory of populism //Politics and ideology in Marxist theory. 1977, pp. 143-200.

41. Laclau E., Mouffe C. Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. Verso Books, 2014.

42. Mouffe, C., 2000. The democratic paradox. London: Verso.

43. Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), pp. 541-563. doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x

44. Mudde C., Kaltwasser C. R. Populism: A very short introduction. - Oxford University Press, 2017.

45. Panizza F. 2005. Introduction: Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. Ed. by F. Panizza. London and New York: Verso. pp. 1-31.

46. Tarchi M. et al. Populism: Ideology, political style, mentality?. Politologický Časopis-Czech Journal of Political Science. 23 (2016), pp. 95-109.

47. Tarchi, Marco. 2015. Italia populista. Dal qualunquismo a Beppe Grillo. Il Mulino: Bologna.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?