Russian Federation
Russian Federation
The situation that has developed as a result of the signing by Russia of the Bologna agreement is considered and an attempt is made to evaluate the prospects for leaving it. It is noted that the introduction of undergraduate and master's master has broken a classic domestic system of higher education. A reference is made to the work of specialists who predicted serious problems of building undergraduate in the sphere of professional activity. In relation to graphic training, two aspects are considered: undergraduate and competency -based approach to education. The undergraduate has greatly cut off not only the audit load, but also the total number of hours to study disciplines. The specified deficit gave rise to the exclusion of drawing geometry from a number of educational standards. This trend was paid attention to, in particular, Bulgarian colleagues. The result is the loss of the theoretical basis of the departments teaching graphic disciplines. The investigation is a loss of independence, unification with other departments. Due to the fact that employers in the field of equipment perceived the undergraduate as unacceptable engineers, unsuitable attempts were made to introduce engineering undergraduate. The deficiency of the auditor's load crushed mentoring - the invaluable quality of domestic education. It is especially important when working with 1-2 courses, due to the lack of graphics at school, insufficient training in the field of geometry, a small emphasis on analytics in the educational process. Attention is drawn to the “quiet revolution” that occurred in domestic education in connection with a competency -based approach. The educational process is built from the result to training i.e. In the opposite direction in relation to the classical scheme. Now the main in training is the employer. The relationship, mutual understanding between it and the university, the individual department unambiguously determines the quality of education. A possible dictate can turn a number of aspects of the educational process into formal or ineffective. Examples are given. In terms of forecasts, it is noted that the undergraduate will not disappear at the same time, and the specialists in the field of graphic training are faced with training using innovative approaches in the educational and production educational process within the framework of a specialty.
Bologna agreement, graphic training, undergraduate, specialty, competence, knowledge, skills, skills
1. Belocerkovskij A.V.. Kravcova L.A.. Dozhdikov A.V. Nezavisimaya vneshnyaya ocenka kachestva podgotovki bavalavra [Independent external assessment of the quality of bachelors training]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia] 2013. I. 5. rr. 3-20.
2. Boyashova E.P. Osobennosti distantsionnogo obucheniya geometro-graficheskim distsiplinam s ispolzovaniem metodov konstruktivnogo geometricheskogo modelirovaniya [Features of distance learning of geometric and graphic disciplines using methods of constructive geometric modeling]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics]. 2021. V. 9. I. 3. rr. 46-56. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/2308 - 4898-2021-9-3-46-56. (in Russian)
3. Vyshnyepolskiy V.I.. Sal?kov N.A. Tseli i metody obucheniya graficheskim distsiplinam [The aims and methods of teaching drawing]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometriya i grafika]. 2013. V. 1. I. 2. rp. 8-9. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/777. (in Russian)
4. Vyshnepol'skij V.I.. Kadykova N.S. Pokazatel' kachestva raboty prepodavatelya i kafedry [Indicator of the quality of the teacher and department]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics]. 2014. V. 2. I. 4. rp. 15-21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/8293. (in Russian)
5. Gitman E.K.. Gitman M.B.. Stolbov V.YU.. Stolbova I.D. O koncepcii razrabotki novyh federal'nyh gosudarstvennyh standartov vysshego obrazovaniya [On the concept of the development of new federal state standards of higher education]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia]. 2014. I. 5. rr. 46-54.
6. Danilov D.P.. Malivanov N.N. Evolyuciya inzhenernoj pedagogiki: osnovaniya i tri izmereniya [Evolution of engineering pedagogy: foundations and three dimentions]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia]. 2021. V. 30. I. 11. rr. 125-138. (in Russian)
7. Donskih O.A. Delo o kompetentnostnom podhode [The case of a competency based approach]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia]. 2013. I. 5. rr. 36-45. (in Russian)
8. Ignatev S.A.. Muratbakeev E.Kh.. Voronina M.V. Povyshenie naglyadnosti predstavleniya izuchaemykh v nachertatelnoi geometrii obektov [Increasing the visibility of the presentation of objects studied in the descriptive geometry]. Geometriya i grafika. [Geometry and graphics]. 2022. V. 10. I. 1. rp. 44-55. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12373/2308-4898-2022-10-1-44-53. (in Russian)
9. Leparov M.N.. Popov M.KH. Inzhenernaya grafika - TO BE. OR NOT TO BE. Mezhdunarodnaya internet-konferentsiya «Problemy kachestva graficheskoy podgotovki studentov v tekhnicheskom vuze: problemy. traditsii i innovatsii» [International Internet conference «Problems of the quality of graphic training of students in a technical university: problems. traditions and innovations»]. Perm. 2012. URL: http://dgng.pstu.ru/conf2012/. (in Russian)
10. Leparov M.N. O geometrii eshchyo odin raz [About geometry one more time]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics]. 2022. V. 10. I. 1. rp. 3-13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/2308-4898-2022-10-1-3-13. (in Russian)
11. Leparov M.N.. Popov M.H. Sostoyanie i tendencii geometro-graficheskoj podgotovki kak komponenty inzhenernogo obrazovaniya v Bolgarii [The state and trends of geometric and gaphic training as components of engineering education in Bulgaria]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics]. 2014. V. 2. I. 1. rp. 22-29. DOI: 10/137/3845. (in Russian)
12. Polovinkin A.I. Osnovy inzhenernogo tvorchestva [Fundamentals of engineering creativiny]. Moscow. Mashinbuilding Publ.. 1988. 368 p. (in Russian)
13. Polyakova T.YU.. Prihod'ko V.M. Kompetencii prepodavatelya tekhnicheskogo vuza [The competencies of the teacher of a technical university]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia]. 2022. V. 31. I. 7. rp. 61-78. (in Russian)
14. Sal'kov N.A. Geometricheskaya sostavlyayushchaya tekhnicheskih innovacij [Geometric component of technical innovation]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics]. 2018. V. 6. I. 2. rp. 85-93. DOI: 10.12737/ article_5b55a5163fa053.07622109. (in Russian)
15. Sal'kov N.A. Analiz FGOSov/novogo pokoleniya [Analysis of GEF new generation]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics]. 2013. V. 1. I. 1. rp. 28-31. DOI: 10/12737/2082. (in Russian)
16. Sal'kov N.A. Problemy sovremennogo geometricheskogo obrazovaniya [Problems of modern geometric education] Mezhdunarodnaya internet-konferentsiya «Problemy kachestva graficheskoy podgotovki studentov v tekhnicheskom vuze: problemy. traditsii i innovatsii» [International Internet conference «Problems of the quality of graphic training of students in a technical university: problems. traditions and innovations»]. Perm. 2014. V. 2. rp. 38-46. URL: http://dgng.pstu.ru/conf2014/. (in Russian)
17. Sal'kov N.A.. Vyshnepol'skij V.I.. Kadykova N.S.. Beglov I.A. Bol'she testirovaniya - men'she obrazovaniya [More testing - less education] Sbornik trudov Vserossijskoj nauchno-metodicheskoj konferencii po inzhenernoj geometrii i komp'yuternoj grafike. CH.2. Moscow. MITHT Publ.. 2008. rp. 27-29. (in Russian)
18. Sal'kov N.A. Amerikanizaciya geometricheskogo obrazovaniya Rossii i nachertatel'naya geometriya [Americanization of the geometric education and descriptive geometry in Russia]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics]. 2015. V. 3. I. 3. rp. 38-45. DOI: 10.12737/ 14418. (in Russian)
19. Senashenko V.S.. Mednikova T.B. Kompetentnostnyj podhod v vysshem obrazovanii: mif i real'nost' [A competency based approach in higher education: myth and reality]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia]. 2014. I. 5. rp. 34-45. (in Russian)
20. Spiridonova E.A. O neodnoznachnyh posledstviyah reform v vysshej shkole Rossii [On the ambiguous consequences of reforms in the Higher School of Russia]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia]. 2017. I. 208 (1). rp. 25-34. (in Russian)
21. Stolbova I.D.. Aleksandrova E.P.. Nosov K.G. Metod proektov v organizacii graficheskoj podgotovki [Project method in the organization of graphic training]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia]. 2015. I. 8-9. rp. 22-31. (in Russian).
22. Stolbova I.D.. Aleksandrova E.P.. Kochurova L.V. Logika innovacij graficheskogo obrazovaniya [Logic of graphic education innovations]. Otkrytoe i distancionnoe obrazovanie [Open and distant education]. 2019. I. 2. rp. 26-34. DOI: 10/17223/ 16095944/2/4. (in Russian)
23. Stolbova I.D. Aktual'nye problemy graficheskoj podgotovki studentov v tekhnicheskih vuzah [Actual problems of graphic training jf students in technical universities]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics]. 2014. V. 2. I. 1. rp.30-41. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.12737/386. (in Russian)
24. Tihonov-Bugrov D.E.. Abrosimov S.N. Proektno-konstruktorskoe obuchenie inzhenernoj grafike: vchera. segodnya. zavtra [Design-design engeneering graphics: yesterday. today.tomorrow]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics]. 2016. V. 3. I. 3. rp. 47-57. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1237/14419. (inRussian)
25. Tihonov-Bugrov D.E. O nekotoryh problemah graficheskoj podgotovki v tekhnicheskih vuzah (vzglyad iz Sankt-Peterburga) [About some problems of graphic training in technical universinies (view from St. Petersburg)]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics]. 2013. V. 2. I. 1. rp. 46-53. DOI: 1012373/3848. (in Russian)
26. Tihonov-Bugrov D.E.. Abrosimov S.N. Distancionnaya lyubov' ili obuchenie graficheskim disciplinam v usloviyah pandemii [Remote love or learning graphic disciplines in the context of pandemia]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics]. 2020. V. 8. I. 3. rp. 44-51. DOI: 10.12737 /2308- 4898-2020-44-51. (in Russian)
27. Tunakov A.P. Zachem prepodavat' studentam umirayushchie discipliny [Why teach students dying disciplines]. Poisk [Search]. 2007. I. 11. (in Russian)
28. Thagapsoev H.G.. YAhupalov M.M. Poisk rezervov v tiskah «vmenyonnogo»: k paradoksam nashej strategii obrazovaniya [Search for reserves in the grip of “imputed”: to the paradoxes of our education strategy integration of education science and production from the basis to realities]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii .[Higher education in Russia]. 2020. V. 29. I. 12. rp. 95-103. (in Russian)
29. Fadeev A.S.. Gerdi V.N.. Baltyan V.K.. Fyodorov V.G. Integraciya obrazovaniya. nauki i proizvodstva: ot bazisa k realiyam [Integration of education. science and production: from the basis to realities]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia]. 2016. I. 4 (200). rp. 55-63. (in Russian)
