INDUSTRIAL POLICY AND THE MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX OF RUSSIA IN CONDITIONS OF FORCED AUTARCHY
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
As the history shows, those states are to survive, which within periods of crises and external threats are able to put aside outworn stereotypes of their previous existence. In the XXI century new challenges have put Russia to the task of accelerating its technological and economic development; otherwise Russia is to give up its status of a world’s great power. As it is quite clear now, the efficient economy — is the economy based on intense use of new knowledge. It is also clear enough, that the package of decisions, aimed to provide transition to the efficient economy can be worked out on the basis of ingenuous and unconventional decisions, especially since the prevailing conditions of a present day seem to be extremely unfavorable.

Keywords:
industrial policy, dynamic optimization of development, autarchy, economic and technological structure.
Text

Введение

Еще в 70-х гг. прошлого века развитые страны мира признали необходимым переход от отраслевой промышленной политики к политике наращивания конкурентоспособности (from «industrial policy» to «industrial competitiveness policy»). Но уже с 2000-х гг. большинство стран декларируют цель промышленной политики как переход к инновационной экономике («knowledge-based economy»). В такой экономике устойчивый экономический рост должны обеспечить производство, распределение и использование знаний. И политика реиндустриализации, которую сегодня реализуют экономически развитые страны, основывается на применении новых знаний и технологий, не только на максимально эффективном использовании предоставляющихся возможностей в области повышения эффективности национального производственного аппарата и возрождении целых отраслей на новой технологической базе на своей территории, но и применяя политическое давление, ослабляя конкурентов с помощью неэкономических мер по ограничению доступа к новым технологиям.

Вне сомнения, необходимо учитывать мировой опыт. Вместе с тем тот же мировой опыт показал, что «догнать и перегнать» передовые страны невозможно, копируя их методы и решения даже в условиях наибольшего благоприятствования со стороны стран — лидеров мировой экономики. Если же эти лидеры сознательно ограничивают возможности использования передовых технологий в жизненно важных секторах догоняющей стороны, тогда задача стать, в конце концов, в один ряд с развитыми странами выглядит нереальной.

References

1. Afanas´eva M.V., Yusim V.N. Dvukhfaznaya model´ makroekonomicheskogo razvitiya [Two-phase model of macroeconomic development]. Materialy mezhdunarodnykh nauchno-prakticheskikh konferentsiy, prokhodivshikh v REU im. G.V. Plekhanova 16 dekabrya 2008 g. i 21-22 aprelya 2009 g. [International scientific and practical conference held in REU them. GV Plekhanov December 16, 2008 and 21-22 April 2009].

2. Afanas´eva M.V. Dvukhetapnaya model´ makroekonomicheskogo razvitiya [Two-stage model of macroeconomic development]. Problemy ekonomiki [Problems of Economics]. 2009, I. 8.

3. Afanas´eva M.V., Stepanova Yu.A., Yusim V.N. Ekonomicheskiy uroven´ tekhnologii - pokazatel´ kachestva sotsial´noekonomicheskikh sistem [Economic level of technology - an indicator of the quality of social and economic systems]. Kreativnaya ekonomika [Creative Economy]. 2009, I. 3.

4. Bellman R. Dinamicheskoe programmirovanie [Dynamic Programming]. Moscow, Izdatel´stvo. inostrannoy literatury Publ., 1960.

5. Brodel´ F. Dinamika kapitalizma [dynamics of capitalism]. Smolensk, Poligramma Publ., 1993.

6. Valentey S.D. Ekonomika innovatsiy i problemy ee formirovaniya [Economics of innovation and problems of its formation]. Nauka i praktika. Nauchno-analiticheskiy zhurnal REU im. G.V. Plekhanova [Science and Practice. Scientific and analytical magazine REU named after Plekhanov]. 2012, I. 1 (7), pp. 53.

7. Glaz´ev S.Yu. Teoriya dolgosrochnogo tekhniko-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [The theory of long-term technical and economic development]. Moscow, VlaDar Publ., 1993.

8. Glaz´ev S.Yu., L´vov D.S., Fetisov G.G. Evolyutsiya tekhnikoekonomicheskikh sistem: vozmozhnosti i granitsy tsentralizovannogo regulirovaniya [The evolution of technical and economic systems: possibilities and limits of centralized regulation]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1992.

9. Dvortsin M.D., Yusim V.N. Tekhnodinamika: osnovy teorii formirovaniya i razvitiya tekhnologicheskikh system [Technodynamics: basic theory of the formation and development of technological systems]. Moscow, nternational Foundation for the History of Science Publ., Diksi Publ., 1993.

10. 10. Denisov I. Teoriya ekonomiko-tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya firm [Theory of economic and technological development firms]. Moscow, Grif i K Publ., 2008.

11. Denisov I. Yusim V. Ekonomiko-tekhnologicheskaya kontseptsiya vozniknoveniya firm i rynkov [Economic-technological concept of the emergence of firms and markets]. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoy teorii [Journal of Economic Theory]. 2011, I. 3.

12. Zuev V.E., Svirchevskiy V.D. Initsiiruyushchee upravlenie v usloviyakh rosta rynochnoy moshchi korporatsiy [Triggering control in the face of rising market power of corporations]. RISK: analiticheskiy zhurnal [RISK: analytical magazine]. 2012, I. 4.

13. Makarov V.L., Rubinov A.M. Matematicheskaya teoriya ekonomicheskoy dinamiki i ravnovesiya [The mathematical theory of economic dynamics and balance]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1973.

14. Nikitin S.M., Stepanova M.P. Yaponskiy opyt vozrozhdeniya i sovremennaya Rossiya [The Japanese experience of revival and modern Russia]. Den´gi i kredit [Money and Credit]. 1992, I. 8.

15. Osipov Yu.M. Teoriya khozyaystva. T. 3. Khozyaystvennaya dinamika. Transformatsiya i perekhody. Neoekonomicheskoe khozyaystvo [The theory of the economy. V. 3. Economic Dynamics. Transformation and transitions. Neoekonomicheskoe economy]. Moscow, 1998.

16. Potapova E.N., Tolkachev S.A. Promyshlennaya politika i gosudarstvennoe regulirovanie ekonomiki (Sovremennye aspekty rossiyskoy praktiki) [Industrial Policy and Regulation (Modern aspects of the Russian practice)]. Moscow, 2006.

17. Rayzberg B.A., Lozovskiy L.Sh. Sovremennyy ekonomicheskiy slovar´ [Modern Dictionary of Economics]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2007.

18. Svirchevskiy V.D., Mishin A.Yu. Interesy menedzhmenta i innovatsionnye initsiativy v biznese [Interests of management and innovative initiatives in business]. Russkiy provintsial´nyy nauchnyy zhurnal «Region: sistemy, ekonomika, upravlenie» [Russian provincial scientific journal «Region: system, economy, management»]. 2012, I. 1 (16).

19. Smit A. Issledovanie o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov. Kniga 1. Prichiny uvelicheniya proizvoditel´nosti truda i poryadok, v sootvetstvii s kotorym ego produkt estestvennym obrazom raspredelyaetsya mezhdu razlichnymi klassami naroda [The Wealth of Nations. Book 1. The reasons for the increase in labor productivity and the order in which its product is naturally distributed among the various classes of people]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2007.

20. Shumpeter Y. Kapitalizm, sotsializm i demokratiya [Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy]. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 1995.

21. Elektronnaya versiya prilozheniya k sborniku «Rossiyskiy statisticheskiy ezhegodnik» 2012 god. Sotsial´no-ekonomicheskie pokazateli Rossiyskoy Federatsii v 1991-2011 gg. [The electronic version of the application to the book «Statistical Yearbook» 2012. Socio-economic indicators of the Russian Federation in 1991-2011 years.]. Available at: http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/materials/news/doc_1279024845688.

22. Yusim V. Potentsial upravlyaemogo razvitiya Rossii [Potential managed development of Russia]. Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya «Sovremennaya ekonomika: kontseptsii i modeli innovatsionnogo razvitiya». REA im. G.V. Plekhanova. 13 maya 2010 g. [International scientific-practical conference «Modern economics: concepts and innovative development model.» Plekhanov. GV Plekhanov. May 13, 2010]

23. Yusim V.N., Dvortsin M.D., Denisov I.V., Belyavskiy V.A. Osnovy teorii ekonomiko-tekhnologicheskikh kompleksov (tezisy) [Fundamentals of the theory of economic-echnological systems (abstract)]. Moscow, Finansy i Kredit Publ., 2005.

24. Brzezinski Zb. Between Two Ages. N.Y., 1970.

25. Watkins Kevin. Making Globalization Work for the Poor. Finance and Development March 2002, Vol. 39. Number 1. Rp. 24-28. Available at: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2002/03/watkins.htm

26. International comparisons of GDP per capita and per employed person 17 countries, 1960-2008. Division of International Labor Comparisons July 28, 2009. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Division of International Labor Comparisons.

27. 2007 World Development Indicators. Raschety ekonomistov World Bank; Kevin Watkins. Making Globalization Work for the Poor. Finance and Development March 2002. Vol. 39. Number 1. Pp. 24-28. Available at: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2002/03/watkins.htm

28. 2013 The World Bank Group. Available at: http://Data.Worldbank.org

29. Available at: http://www.umpro.ru/index.php?page_id=17&;art_id_1= 167&group_id_4 =62

30. Available at: http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/A%D

31. Available at: http://www.enterprise-development.org/page/industrial-policy#Debates

32. Available at: http://www.libertarium.ru/libertarium/lib_capsocdem

33. Available at: http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/ 19.12.2013

Login or Create
* Forgot password?