Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Introduction. Due to the fact that modern military-political communication science deals with very contradictory both factual non-verbal and text-discursive phenomena, it seems necessary and relevant the scientific systematization of military-political terminology. The development of a unified terminological apparatus and methodological approach also needs to be clarified in modern communication science. The aim of the article is a communicative-cognitive and textual-discursive study of the segment of political communication science called military-political science. Methodology and research methods. Adhering to the traditional three-term division for discursive, communicative and lexico-grammatical levels of description, we present the communicative-discursive model "modern war" based on the materials of the official Russian media in 2021-2022. The article uses the research methods of linguoconceptology, linguoculturology, such as modeling concepts, methods of component lexical analysis that help to establish the seme composition of individual lexemes. And there is also lexicographic analysis aimed at compiling a fragment of the dictionary, which concerns modern military-political terminology. Results. The article demonstrates that the communicative-discursive fragment "war" not only forms the core of military-political communication science, but also sets many directions for interpreting and modeling the basic dominant associative-semantic components."Modern war" is presented as a hybrid, multifaceted, multicomponent, covering and connecting absolutely all spheres of human and social life, both real and virtual. It is the latter that transforms war into a cruel game, where certain actions are carried out in a false, illusory space according to easily violated rules. Interpretation and modeling of modern military-political discourse creates a communicative-cognitive base for a correct understanding of real events, excludes the possibility of manipulating public consciousness, excludes the possibility of effective information and propaganda wars, and therefore serves as a powerful methodological tool for verifying the modern most complex information field. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the systematization of the structure and content of the terminological system of military-political communication science as a section of political communication science and communication science in general. The practical significance of the study lies in the use of modeling methods for various text-discursive fragments in the communicative aspect, which is aimed at clarifying existing models and constructing and interpreting the latest ones.

Keywords:
military-political communication science, political communication, hybrid political war, information war, diplomatic war, proxy war
References

1. Kommersant' [Elektronnyy resurs]: elektron. versiya gaz. URL: https://www.kommersant.ru/

2. Lebedev S.V. Sovremennaya kommunikativistika v strukture rossiyskoy politicheskoy nauki : avtoref. dis. na soisk. uch. step. k. polit. n. M., 2013. 23 s.

3. Mikryukov V.Yu. Proksi-voyna [Elektronnyy resurs] // Nauchno-issledovatel'skiy centr problem nacional'noy bezopasnosti. 2015. URL: http://nic-pnb.ru/analytics/proksi-vojna/

4. Moskovskiy komsomolec [Elektronnyy resurs]: elektron. versiya gaz. URL: https://www.mk.ru/

5. Novye slova i znacheniya. Slovar'-spravochnik po materialam pressy i literatury 80-h godov / Pod red. E. A. Levashova. SPb.: Dmitriy Bulanin, 1997. 903 s.

6. Rosciyskaya gazeta [Elektronnyy resurs]: elektron. versiya gaz. URL: https://rg.ru/

7. Timofeeva L.N. Politicheskaya kommunikativistika: mirovaya i Rossiyskaya proekcii // Polit. nauka. 2016. № 2. C. 74-100.

8. Frazeologicheskiy slovar' russkogo literaturnogo yazyka: v 2-h tomah. M.: Citadel', 1997.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?