COMMENTARY ON THE JUDGMENTS OF THE ECTHR GRAND CHAMBER IN THE CASES “BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS V. THE UNITED KINGDOM” AND “CENTRUM FÖR RÄTTVISA V. SWEDEN”
Authors:
Type:
Article
Pages:
from 1
to 1
Status:
Published
Received:
06.07.2022
Accepted:
06.07.2022
Published:
06.07.2022
Subject area:
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
Language:
Russian
Keywords:
informacionnye tehnologii, massovoe nablyudenie, perehvat, bezopasnost', razumnoe podozrenie, vmeshatel'stvo v chastnuyu zhizn'
Abstract (English):
Bol'shaya palata Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka vynesla dolgozhdannye postanovleniya po delam «Nekommercheskaya organizaciya “Bol'shoy brat sledit” i drugie protiv Soedinennogo Korolevstva» (Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom) i «Nekommercheskaya organizaciya “Centr pravosudiya” protiv Shvecii» (Centrum För Rättvisa v. Sweden). Dannye dela imeyut vazhnoe znachenie dlya gosudarstv — chlenov Soveta Evropy, kotorye vse bol'she v svoey povsednevnoy praktike polagayutsya na shirokoe ispol'zovanie massovogo nablyudeniya, chto opravdyvaet ih ozhidaniya v nalichii effektivnyh sredstv bor'by s transgranichnoy prestupnost'yu i terrorizmom. Rassmatrivaemye resheniya yavlyayutsya po suschestvu pervymi v voprose o massovom elektronnom slezhenii i zatragivayut problemu o tom, v kakoy stepeni takoe nablyudenie dopustimo i pri kakih usloviyah. Nablyudenie tradicionno rassmatrivalos' s tochki zreniya individual'nogo slezheniya, kogda chelovek mozhet byt' ob'ektom kontrolya pri nalichii razumnyh osnovaniy dlya podozreniya. Sam harakter massovogo sbora dannyh i razveddannyh oznachaet, chto takie podozreniya neobyazatel'ny. Sud po suschestvu ustanovil poryadok massovogo nablyudeniya i ego vyvody sootvetstvuyut obschey praktike rasshireniya ispol'zovaniya nablyudeniya i perehvata dannyh vo mnogih evropeyskih gosudarstvah, chto odnovremenno stavit trebuyuschie dal'neyshih issledovaniy voprosy, kasayuschiesya zaschity prav i svobod cheloveka.
Bol'shaya palata Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka vynesla dolgozhdannye postanovleniya po delam «Nekommercheskaya organizaciya “Bol'shoy brat sledit” i drugie protiv Soedinennogo Korolevstva» (Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom) i «Nekommercheskaya organizaciya “Centr pravosudiya” protiv Shvecii» (Centrum För Rättvisa v. Sweden). Dannye dela imeyut vazhnoe znachenie dlya gosudarstv — chlenov Soveta Evropy, kotorye vse bol'she v svoey povsednevnoy praktike polagayutsya na shirokoe ispol'zovanie massovogo nablyudeniya, chto opravdyvaet ih ozhidaniya v nalichii effektivnyh sredstv bor'by s transgranichnoy prestupnost'yu i terrorizmom. Rassmatrivaemye resheniya yavlyayutsya po suschestvu pervymi v voprose o massovom elektronnom slezhenii i zatragivayut problemu o tom, v kakoy stepeni takoe nablyudenie dopustimo i pri kakih usloviyah. Nablyudenie tradicionno rassmatrivalos' s tochki zreniya individual'nogo slezheniya, kogda chelovek mozhet byt' ob'ektom kontrolya pri nalichii razumnyh osnovaniy dlya podozreniya. Sam harakter massovogo sbora dannyh i razveddannyh oznachaet, chto takie podozreniya neobyazatel'ny. Sud po suschestvu ustanovil poryadok massovogo nablyudeniya i ego vyvody sootvetstvuyut obschey praktike rasshireniya ispol'zovaniya nablyudeniya i perehvata dannyh vo mnogih evropeyskih gosudarstvah, chto odnovremenno stavit trebuyuschie dal'neyshih issledovaniy voprosy, kasayuschiesya zaschity prav i svobod cheloveka.
Keywords:
informacionnye tehnologii, massovoe nablyudenie, perehvat, bezopasnost', razumnoe podozrenie, vmeshatel'stvo v chastnuyu zhizn'
informacionnye tehnologii, massovoe nablyudenie, perehvat, bezopasnost', razumnoe podozrenie, vmeshatel'stvo v chastnuyu zhizn'
No data
1. No data
