Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Purpose: Assessment of the compliance of the radiation protection of workers at the complex experimental installations of JSC SChC with the requirements of the Russian radiation safety standards NRB-99/2009 to limit the generalized risk of potential exposure and the IAEA recommendations for not exceeding the control level of the minimum significant radiation risk. Materials and methods: The results of radiation-hygienic investigations of radiation exposure factors affecting workers involved in the manufacture of mixed uranium-plutonium nitride (MUPN) fuel at the complex experimental installations of JSC SChC are used as the input data for the preliminary assessment of radiation doses to workers. The models for assessment of radiation risk of potential exposure have been developed in accordance with the recommendations of the ICRP and the IAEA. Results: Preliminary estimates of the doses of external gamma-neutron (2.5 ± 0.5 mSv / year) and internal exposure of workers (~1 mSv/year1) are related to the current levels of exposure of workers of complex experimental installations. These levels are the result of exposure to ionizing radiation sources associated both with the development of new technologies and with residual radioactive contamination resulting from previous activities not related to the manufacture of MUPN fuel. The presented dose estimates are related to the use of raw materials that have undergone deep preliminary purification from radiogenic impurities. When irradiated nuclear materials are used as raw materials, the levels of gamma-neutron exposure to workers will be significantly higher. The maximum increase in the generalized risk of potential exposure due to annual exposure is estimated for women aged 18 years at the beginning of exposure, for which the increase in this risk is 1.45 × 10-4 year-1, which is 1.37 times lower than the limit established by the Russian radiation safety standards NRB-99/2009: 2 × 10-4 year-1. All predicted values of the lifetime attributable fraction of radiation (LARF) in mortality from malignant neoplasms are significantly less than the control level of the minimum significant risk recommended by the IAEA (LARF = 5 %), and the maximum value of LARF = 2.8 % is achieved for women aged 18 years at the beginning of exposure. Conclusion: Restrictions on the radiation risks of potential exposure, established by NRB-99/2009, as well as those recommended by the IAEA for not exceeding the reference level of the minimum significant risk, are met with a large reserve. The results obtained and the developed methods will be used to ensure the radiation safety of workers during the transition from experimental installations to pilot industrial implementation of the technology for the production of MUPN fuel.
mixed nitride uranium-plutonium fuel, radiation safety, complex experimental installation, radiation dose to workers, radiation risk, generalized risk of potential exposure
1. Adamov Ye.O., Dzhalavyan A.V., Lopatkin A.V., Molokanov N.A., Muravyev Ye.V., Orlov V.V., Kalyakin S.G., Rachkov V.I., Troyanov V.M., Avronin Ye.N., Ivanov V.B., Aleksakhin R.M. Conceptual Provisions of the Strategy for the Development of Nuclear Power in Russia in the Long Term Up to 2100. Atomnaya energiya = Atomic energy. 2012;112;6:319-330 (In Russ.).
2. Ed. Ivanov V.K., Adamov E.O. New Generation Nuclear Power: Radiological Consistency and Environmental Benefits. Moscow, Pero Publ., 2019. 379 p. (In Russ.).
3. European Commission, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, International Atomic Energy Agency, International Labour Organization, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, Pan American Health Organization, United Nations Environment Programme, World Health Organization, Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 3, IAEA, Vienna, 2014.
4. Ivanov V.K., Chekin S.Yu., Menyaylo A.N., Maksyutov M.A., Tumanov K.A., Kashcheyeva P.V., Lovachev S.S., Adamov Ye.O., Lopatkin A.V. Levels of Radiological Protection of the Public Under Implementation of the Principle of Radiation Equivalence: a Risk-Based Approach. Radiatsiya i Risk = Radiation and Risk. 2018;27;3:9-23 (In Russ.).
5. Ivanov V.K., Chekin S.Yu., Menyaylo A.N., Maksyutov M.A., Tumanov K.A., Kashcheyeva P.V., Lovachev S.S., Adamov YE.O., Lopatkin A.V. Radiation and Radiological Equivalence of Radioactive Waste in Two-Component Nuclear Power. Radiatsiya i Risk = Radiation and Risk. 2019;28;1:5-25 (In Russ.).
6. Chekin S.Yu., Menyaylo A.N., Lovachev S.S., Seleva N.G., Korelo A.M., Tumanov K.A., Ivanov V.K. Assessment of Potential Radiological Risks of the Public under Implementation of the "Proryv" Project of the State Atomic Energy Corporation "Rosatom". Part 1. ICRP Recommendations. Radiatsiya i Risk = Radiation and Risk. 2020;29;4:33-47 (In Russ.).
7. Ivanov V.K., Chekin S.Yu., Menyaylo A.N., Lovachev S.S., Seleva N.G., Bakin R.I., Ilyichev Ye.A., Kiselev A.A., Solomatin V.M., Adamov Ye.O., Lemekhov V.V., Proukhin A.V. Assessment of Potential Radiological Risks of the Public under Implementation of the "Proryv" Project of the State Atomic Energy Corporation "Rosatom". Part 2. Determination of Radiological Detriment. Radiatsiya i Risk = Radiation and Risk. 2020;29;4:48-68 (In Russ.).
8. Ilyin L.A., Samoylov A.S., Tsovyanov A.G., Shinkarev S.M., Shandala N.K., Gantsovskiy P.P., Karev A.YE., Kukhta B.A., Simakov A.V., Klochkov V.N., Korenkov I.P., Lyaginskaya A.M., Parinov O.V., Solomatin V.M., Izmestyev K.M. Radiation-Hygienic Investigations of Experimental Production of Mixed Nitride Uranium-Plutonium Fuel at JSC SChC. Part 1. Methods and Results. Meditsinskaya Radiologiya i Radiatsionnaya Bezopasnost = Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2021;5:23-32 (In Russ.).
9. Radiation Safety Standards NRB-99/2009. Sanitary Rules and Standards SanPiN 2.6.1.2523 - 09. Moscow, Publ., 2009. 100 p. (In Russ.).
10. The Fukushima Daiichi Accident. Technical Volume 4/5: Radiological Consequences. Vienna, International Atomic Energy Agency, 2015. 250 p.
11. MU 2.6.5.028-2016. 2.6.5. Nuclear Energy and Industry. Determination of Individual Effective and Equivalent Doses and Organization of Control of Occupational Exposure Under Conditions of Planned Exposure. General Requirements. Methodical Instructions. Methodological Support of Radiation Monitoring in the Nuclear Industry. Moscow, NPP "Doza" Publ., 2016. V.1. P.41-117 (In Russ.).
12. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Effects of Ionizing Radiation. V. 1. UNSCEAR 2006 Report to the General Assembly, Scientific Annexes A and B. New York, United Nations, 2008. 383 p.
13. Kellerer A.M., Nekolla E.A., Walsh L. On the Conversion of Solid Cancer Excess Relative Risk into Lifetime Attributable Risk. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2001;40;4:249-257.
14. The 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann. ICRP. 2007;37;2-4:1-332.
15. Menyaylo A.N., Chekin S.Yu., Kashcheyev V.V., Maksyutov M.A., Korelo A.M., Tumanov K.A., Pryakhin Ye.A., Lovachev S.S., Karpenko S.V., Kashcheyeva P.V., Ivanov V.K. Lifetime Radiation Risk from External and Internal Exposure: an Assessment Method. Radiatsiya i Risk = Radiation and Risk. 2018;27;1: 8-21 (In Russ.).
16. Ivanov V.K., Karpenko S.V., Kashcheyev V.V., Lovachev S.S., Kashcheyeva P.V., Shchukina N.V., Tumanov K.A., Kochergina YE.V., Maksyutov M.A. Dependence of the Minimum Detectable Dose Level of Radiation Risks of Cancer Versus the Observation Period in a Cohort of Russian Liquidators of the Chernobyl Accident. Radiatsiya i Risk = Radiation and Risk. 2018;27;3:32-41 (In Russ.).
