The article presents the results of standardization of the "Personality’s Agency Activity Profile" methodology. This methodology is the author's multidimensional personality questionnaire, with confirmed validity and reliability, and is aimed at discovering the personality positioning system that determines the nature and orientation of the agent’s activity. The problems of standardization of personal psychological questionnaires are raised, in particular, the problems of the relativity of the norms obtained during standardization and the need for additional indicators to receive a correct psychodiagnostic interpretation. A step-by-step scheme for standardizing the methodology scales has been implemented on a sample of 958 people, including a test for the normality and homogeneity of empirical distributions. The need for differentiated standardization of the methodology depending on the gender and age of the respondents has been substantiated using the methods of mathematical statistics. For the middle-aged (25-42 years old) part of the sample, tables for converting raw test scores to stanines have been built up and presented.
Personality’s Agency Activity Profile, percentile standardization, differentiated standardization, empirical distributions
1. Ayvazyan S.A. Prikladnaya statistika, Osnovy modelirovaniya i pervichnaya obrabotka dannyh. Spravochnoe izdanie/ S.A. Ayvazyan, I.S. Enyukov, L.D. Meshalkin; pod red. S.A. Ayvazyana. - M.: Finansy i statistika, 1983. - 471s.
2. Anastazi, A. Psihologicheskoe testi¬rovanie / A. Anastazi, S. Urbina. - SPb.:Piter, 2001 - 668 s.
3. Baturin N.A.Tehnologiya razrabotki psihodiagnosticheskih metodik: monografiya / N. A. Baturin, N. N. Mel'nikova; M-vo obrazovaniya i nauki Rossiyskoy Federacii, Yuzhno-Ural'skiy gos. un-t. - Chelyabinsk : YuUrGU, 2012. - 134, [1] s. : tabl.; 21 sm.; ISBN 978-5-696-04216-9
4. Bodalev A.A.Obschaya psihodiagnostika: [uchebnik] / [A. A. Bodalev i dr.]. - Sankt-Peterburg: Rech', 2006 (Sankt-Peterburg : Pechatnyy dvor im. A. M. Gor'kogo). - 438, [1] s. : il., tabl.; 21 sm. - (Psihologiya).; ISBN 5-9268-0015-3 (V per.)(Psihologiya)
5. Ganzen V.A., Balin V.D. Teoriya i metodologiya psihologicheskogo issledovaniya. -SPb RIO, SPb GU, 1991, 75 s.
6. Glass Dzh., Stenli Dzh. Statisticheskie metody v pedagogike i psihologii / Per. s angl. - M.: Progress, 1976, 494 c.
7. Dyuk V.A. Komp'yuternaya psihodiagnostika / V. A. Dyuk. - SPb. : Bratstvo, 1994. - 363s, [1] s. : il.; 21 sm.; ISBN 5-87918-027-1 (V per.)
8. Znakov V.V. Psihologiya sub'ekta kak metodologiya ponimaniya chelovecheskogo bytiya // Psihologicheskiy zhurnal, 2003, tom 24, № 2, s. 95-106]
9. Znakov V.V., Ryabikina Z.I. Psihologiya chelovecheskogo bytiya.- M.: Smysl, 2017. - 416s.
10. Klayn, P. Spravochnoe rukovodstvo po konstruirovaniyu testov: Vvedenie v psihometricheskoe proektirovanie / P. Klayn; pod red. L.F. Burlachuka. - Kiev: Izd-vo PANLtd, 1994 - 688 s.
11. Kuper, K. Individual'nye razlichiya /K. Kuper; pod red. I. V. Ravich-Scherbo. - M.:Aspekt Press, 2000 - 527 s.
12. Mel'nikov V. M., Yampol'skiy L. T. Vvedenie v eksperimental'nuyu psihologiyulichnosti. - M: Prosveschenie, 1985,319 s.
13. Mitina O.V. Razrabotka i adaptaciya psihologicheskih oprosnikov. M.: Smysl, 2011, 235 s.
14. Petros'yan S.N., Ryabikina Z.I., Gubanova N.Yu. Strukturnaya validnost' metodiki «Lichnostnyy profil' sub'ektnoy aktivnosti» / S. N. Petros'yan, Z.I. Ryabikina, N.Yu. Gubanova // «Gumanizaciya obrazovaniya» // -2021. - №1. -S. 41 - 58. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24411/1029-3388-2020-10148
15. Petros'yan S. N., Ryabikina Z. I. Tipy sub'ektnoy aktivnosti: sub'ektno-bytiynyy podhod. Lichnost' i vyzovy sovremennosti: interpretaciya problem razlichnymi nauchnymi shkolami / Pod red. Z.I. Ryabikinoy i V.V. Znakova. - Maykop: Adygeyskiy gos. un-t; Krasnodar: Kubanskiy gos. un-t, 2020. - 348 s. ISBN 978-5-91692-766-5 S. 54-57.
16. Ryabikina Z.I. Perspektivy issledovaniy lichnosti s teoretiko-metodologicheskih poziciy psihologii sub'ekta // «Chelovek. Soobschestvo. Upravlenie» №3, 2013. S. 6-19.
17. Fer, R. Maykl. Psihometrika: vvedenie / R. Maykl Fer, Vern R. Bakarak ; pod red. N. A. Baturina, E. V. Eydmana ; per. s angl. [A. S. Naumenko, A. Yu. Popov] ; M-vo obrazovaniya i nauki Rossiyskoy Federacii, Federal'noe agentstvo po obrazovaniyu, Yuzhno-Ural'skiy gos. un-t, Kaf. "Psihologicheskaya diagnostika i konsul'tirovanie". - Chelyabinsk: Izd. centr YuUrGU, 2010. - 412, [1] s. : il., tabl.; 25 sm.; ISBN 978-5-696-04037-0 (v per.) Per.: Furr, R. Michael Psychometrics Los Angeles [etc.]: Sage Publications, 2008. Psihologiya -- Metodika i tehnika nauchno-issledovatel'skoy raboty v oblasti psihologii -- Metod testov.
18. Shmelev, A.G. Psihodiagnostika lichnostnyh chert / A.G. Shmelev. - SPb.: Rech',Shmelev, A.G. - 472, [1] s. : il., tabl.; 22 sm. - (Psihologicheskiy praktikum).; ISBN 5-9268-0084-6(Psihologicheskiy praktikum) Obschaya psihologiya -- Psihologiya lichnosti -- Metodika i tehnika nauchno-issledovatel'skoy raboty v oblasti psihologii.
19. Coaley Keith, An Introduction to Psychological Assessment and Psychometrics, 2010, doi: https://doi.org /10.4135/9781446221556
20. Cohen, P., Cohen, J., Aiken, L., & West, S. G. (1999). The problem of units and the circumstance for POMP. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34(3), 315-346. https://doi.org /10.1207/S15327906MBR3403_2
21. Del Giudice, Marco. (2015). Gender Differences in Personality and Social Behavior // International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Ed. J. D. Wright. Elsevier, 2015, pp.750-756)https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.25100-3.
22. Goodhew, Stephanie &Dawel, Amy & Edwards, Mark. (2020). Standardizing measurement in psychological studies: On why one second has different value in a sprint versus a marathon. Behavior Research Methods. 52, pp. 2338-2348. doihttps://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01383-7
23. Goodhew, S. C., & Edwards, M. (2019). Translating experimental paradigms into individual-differences research: Contributions, challenges, and practical recommendations. Consciousness and Cognition, 69, 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2019.01.008
24. Fischer, Ronald & Milfont, Taciano. (2010). Standardization in psychological research. International Journal of Psychological Research, ISSN 2011-7922, Vol. 3, Nº. 1, 2010, pags. 88-96. doihttps://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.852.
25. Matthews, Gerald & Oddy, Keith. (2002). Ipsative and Normative Scales in Adjectival Measurement of Personality: Problems of Bias and Discrepancy. International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 5. 169 - 182.https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00057.
26. Saville, P. & Wilson, E. (1991). The reliability and validity of normative and ipsative approaches in the measurement of personality. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 64, 219-238.pp 219-2384 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1991.tb00556x
27. Scholtz, Salome & Klerk, Werner & de Beer, Leon. (2020). The Use of Research Methods in Psychological Research: A Systematised Review. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics. 5. 1. dohttps://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2020.00001.
28. Urbina, Susana. (2014). Essentials of Psychological Testing. ISBN: 978-1-118-68048-3 August 2014 400 Pages
