Russian Federation
An integrated approach to the analysis of the potential of the phases and participants of the reproduction process at the stage of forming the product policy of a machine-building enterprise and its development in critical directions is proposed. This allows, from a unified standpoint on the mismatch between the target and the achieved level of potential, to identify critical participants in the reproduction cycle, whose internal capabilities are insufficient to optimize the economic result from the product program and to identify the contribution of each participant based on the analysis of the hierarchy of cause-and-effect relationships of the variables of the utility function with the elements of their potential, as well as assess and select local development strategies for critical participants. The materials of the article can be useful to specialists dealing with the problems of developing a product policy and developing enterprises.
enterprise, product policy, reproduction process, functional potential, development/management
1. Saati T., Kerns K. Analiticheskoe planirovanie. Organizaciya sistem. M.: Radio i svyaz', 1993. 224 s.
2. Abramova M.I. Analiz faktorov, sderzhivayuschih razvitie otechestvennoy innovacionnoy sfery // Izvestiya TulGU. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki. Vyp. 5. Ch. I. Tula: Izd-vo TulGU, 2015. S. 149 -160.
3. Lapteva E.A. Klassifikaciya faktorov razvitiya innovacionnogo potenciala predpriyatiya // Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo. 2013. №9. C.495-498.
4. Kurskiy V.A., Chachina E.B. Effektivnoe upravlenie parametrami razvitiya i ispol'zovaniya funkcional'nogo potenciala predpriyatiya //Izvestiya TulGU. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki. Vyp. 3. Ch. I. Tula: Izd-vo TulGU, 2016. S.132 - 141.
5. Kempbell E., Sammers Lachs K. Strategicheskiy sinergizm, 2-e izd. - SPb.: Piter, 2004. 416 s.
6. Kurskiy V.A., Chachina E.B. Razvitie produktovogo portfelya predpriyatiy, rabotayuschih v vysokotehnologicheskih sferah v usloviyah strukturnyh ogranicheniy ih profilya // Izvestiya TulGU. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki. Vyp. 4. Ch. I. Tula: Izd-vo TulGU, 2015. S. 226 -235.
7. Kurskiy V.A., Vasin L.A. Podhod k prognozirovaniyu rezul'tatov ot perspektivnyh vidov deyatel'nosti mashinostroitel'nogo predpriyatiya // Ekonomicheskiy analiz: teoriya i praktika, 2019. T. 18, № 6. S. 1030 - 1039.
8. Gladyshevskiy A.I. Formirovanie proizvodstvennogo potenciala: analiz i prognozirovanie. M.: Ekonomika, 1992. 325 s.
9. Kabanov A.G., Pyshnyuk V.I. Voprosy effektivnogo ispol'zovaniya nauchno-tehnicheskogo potenciala oboronno-promyshlennogo kompleksa na puti perehoda k ekonomike innovacionnogo potenciala // Konversiya v mashinostroenii. 2000. №1. S.5-9.
10. Gorbunov V.L., Matveev P.G. Metodika ocenki innovacionnogo potenciala predpriyatiya / V.L. Gorbunov, P.G. Matveev // Innovacii. 2002. №8. C. 67-69.
11. Shlyahto I.V. Ocenka innovacionnogo potenciala promyshlennogo predpriyatiya. Vestnik Bryanskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universiteta. 2006. №1 (9). C. 109-115.
12. Kudryavceva G.N., Sycheva I.V. Prognozirovanie razvitiya rynka chernyh metallov kak osnova planirovaniya investicionnoy deyatel'nosti predpriyatiy otrasli // Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniy. Chernaya metallurgiya. 2008. № 5. S. 54-58.
13. Babanov V.N., Sycheva I.V., Voronkina D.V., Sycheva N.A. Principy sovremennogo hozyaystvovaniya v usloviyah ogranichennosti prirodnyh resursov // Izvestiya TulGU. Nauki o Zemle. 2018. № 4. S. 365-372.
14. Kurskiy V.A.; Chachina E.B. Ierarhicheskoe strukturirovanie kak instrument planirovaniya razvitiya predpriyatiya // Izvestiya TulGU. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki. Vyp. 3. Ch. I. Tula: Izd-vo TulGU, 2018. S.67-76.
