In this article, we consider the linguopragmatic essence of terror, explain its communicative potential as an element of a sign system, and present both the sociopolitical and linguistic typology of this concept. The author analyzes the «terror» lexeme from the positions of syntagmatics, pragmatics and derivatives.
terror; terrorist communication; typology of terror; syntagmatic; paradigmatic; derivative
1. Grigor'eva O.N. Imena terrora v sovremennom russkom yazyke // Vestnik MGU. Seriya 9. Filologiya. 2002. № 3. S. 84-93.
2. Derrida Zh. O grammatologii. M., 2000. 247 s.
3. Issers O.S. Kommunikativnye strategii i taktiki russkoy rechi. M.: KomKniga, 2006. 88 s.
4. Kugay A.I. Priroda repressivnoy morfologii // Obrazovanie i nasilie. Sbornik statey / Pod red. K.S. Pigrova. SPb., 2004. S. 128-137.
5. Kunina M.N. Kognitivno-pragmaticheskie harakteristiki terroristicheskogo diskursa: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Krasnodar, 2001.
6. Stepanov Yu.S. Konstanty. Slovar' russkoy kul'tury. M., 2004.
7. Eko U. Otsutstvuyuschaya struktura. Vvedenie v semiologiyu. SPb.: Simpozium, 2006. 544 s.
8. Eko U. Polnyy nazad! «Goryachie voyny» i populizm v SMI. M.: Eksmo, 2007. 592 s.
