TRIANGLE OF KNOWLEDGE “EXTRA-DAY EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND CONDITIONS OF ITS REALIZATION IN EDUCATION
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The article shows the methodological problems of the organization of extracurricular activities of schoolchildren in the context of the “knowledge triangle” concept, which includes interconnections in the triad “education - science - innovation” in order to systemically transform the school of a new generation in the conditions of information postmodernism. The homework of schoolchildren is presented as an extracurricular independent activity of a schoolchild, undergoing significant changes due to a breakthrough in the educational process of technical and technological innovations. The prerequisites of a new vision of the problems of organization and management of educational activity (cognition) of schoolchildren and their consideration in the conditions of developing innovations are shown. Technological innovations in the form of new electronic equipment and interdisciplinary humanitarian technologies affect the updating of the content of subject courses, which, when introduced into the context of educational activity, change the forms of information transmission, the structure of its activity organization and assimilation. Understanding this problem implies the knowledge of the researcher about the features of the content, self-organization operations, the resulting communicative relationships and the features of the translation of educational material. An analysis of educational development trends shows the desire of world communities to integrate and form a new global information society based on fundamental knowledge, science, technology, high technology, allowing to achieve an increase in the pace of economic development and favorable social transformations. The factors of influence on the state of extracurricular work of schoolchildren, emerging didactic barriers in the real process of completing homework are considered. The views of domestic and foreign scientists on the problem of necessity and the abolition of homework are presented. The strategic guidelines of the organization of extracurricular activities are shown, designed to ensure the overcoming of negative influence factors through the development of instrumental-activity platforms, including digital ones, which provide rational forms of translation, perception, understanding and application of educational material.

Keywords:
the triangle of knowledge, extracurricular activities, homework, FSES, functional literacy, fundamental content, a holistic worldview, interdisciplinarity, communication, didactic barriers, instrumental activity platforms, strategic guidelines
References

1. Budanov V.G. Metodologiya sinergetiki v postneklassicheskoj nauke i obrazovanii [Methodology of synergetics in post-non-classical science and education]. Moscow: LKI Publ., 2008. 232 p.

2. Davydov V.V. Teoriya razvivayushchego obucheniya [Developmental learning theory]. Moscow: Intor Publ., 1996. 544 p.

3. Domashnyaya rabota v nachal'noj shkole prinosit bol'she vreda, chem pol'zy [Homework in primary school is more harmful than good]. Available at: https://fb.ru/post/childhood-education/2020/5/22/212730

4. Instrumental'naya didaktika: perspektivnye sredstva, sredy i tekhnologii obucheniya [Instrumental didactics: promising tools, environments and learning technologies]. FGNU Institut soderzhaniya i metodov obucheniya RAO [FGNU Institute of content and teaching methods of the Russian Academy of Education]. Moscow: St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya Publ. 2012. 436 p.

5. Knyazeva E.N. Probuzhdayushchee obrazovanie [Awakening education]. Sinergeticheskaya paradigma. Sinergetika obrazovaniya [Synergetic paradigm. Synergetics of education]. Moscow: Progress - Tradiciya Publ. 2007. 592 p.

6. Lednev V.S. Soderzhanie obrazovaniya: sushchnost', struktura, perspektivy [The content of education: essence, structure, prospects]. Moscow: Vyssh. shk. Publ., 1991. 224 p.

7. Lerner I.Ya. Didakticheskie osnovy metodov obucheniya [Didactic foundations of teaching methods]. Moscow: Pedagogika Publ. 1981. 186 p.

8. LʼEducation a la deference //B.O. dʼeducation nat.: Nr. Hors-ser. ISSN 1268-4791. - 1998.- № 8. - R.5-19

9. Makarenya A.A. Izbrannye Trudy [Selected Works]. Pedagogika. Pedagogicheskaya kul'turologiya. Pedagogicheskaya antropoekologiya. Andragogika [Pedagogy. Pedagogical culturology. Pedagogical anthropoecology. Andragogy]. Tyumen': TOGIRRO Publ., 2000, V. 3, 316 p.

10. Moiseev N.N. Universum. Informaciya. Obshchestvo [Universum. Information. Society]. Moscow: Ustojchivyj mir Publ., 2001. 200 p.

11. Munipov V.M., Zinchenko V.P. Ergonomika: chelovekoorientirovannoe proektirovanie tekhniki, programmnyh sredstv i sredy [Ergonomics: human-centered design of technology, software and environment]. Moscow: Lotos Publ., 2001. 356 p.

12. Nazarova T.S. Konceptual'nye osnovaniya formirovaniya funkcional'noj gramotnosti v obrazovanii [Conceptual foundations for the formation of functional literacy in education]. Pedagogika [Pedagogy]. 2017, I. 10.

13. Nazarova T.S. Standart uchebno-material'noj bazy shkoly v usloviyah realizacii FGOS [The standard of the educational and material base of the school in the context of the implementation of the Federal State Educational Standard]. Standarty i monitoring obrazovaniya [Standards and Monitoring of Education]. 2014, I. 5.

14. Nuzhno li domashnee zadanie v shkole? Mnenie uchenyh [Do you need homework at school? The opinion of scientists]. Available at: https://activityedu.ru/Blogs/interesting/statya-nuzhno-li-domashnee-zadanie/

15. Serikov V.V. Lichnostnyj podhod v obrazovanii: koncepciya i tekhnologii [Personal approach in education: concept and technology]. Volgograd: Peremena Publ., 1994. 152 p.

16. Teoreticheskie osnovy soderzhaniya obshchego srednego obrazovaniya [Theoretical foundations of the content of general secondary education]. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 1983. 352 p.

17. Unger M., Polt V. Treugol'nik znanij mezhdu sferami nauki, obrazovaniya i innovacij: konceptual'naya diskussiya [Knowledge triangle between science, education and innovation: conceptual discussion]. 2017, V. 11, I. 2, pp. 10-26 [Unger M., Polt W. (2017) The Knowledge Triangle between Research, Education and Innovation - A Conceptual Discussion. Foresight and STI Governance, vol. 11, no 2, pp. 10-26. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2017.2.10.26]

18. Fajzullina A. Cifrovye platformy v zarubezhnyh shkolah [Digital platforms in foreign schools]. Available at: //vogazeta.ru/articles/2019/8/5/bigdata/8758sifrovye_platformy_v_zarubezhnyh_shkolah

19. Shapovalenko S.G. O preodolenii otstavaniya metodik kak nauki [On overcoming the backlog of methods as a science]. Sovetskaya pedagogika [Soviet pedagogy]. 1953, I. 11.

20. 6 prichin, pochemu domashnee zadanie bespolezno i dazhe vredno [6 reasons why homework is useless and even harmful]. Available at: http://www.appdigg.ru/show-466779-6-prichin-pochemu-domashnee-zadanie-bespolezno-i-dazhe-vredno.html

21. Ekspress-analiz cifrovyh obrazovatel'nyh resursov i servisov dlya organizacii uchebnogo processa shkol v distancionnoj forme [Express-analysis of digital educational resources and services for organizing the educational process of schools in a distance form]. Nacional'nyj issledovatel'skij universitet «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki», Institut obrazovaniya [National Research University Higher School of Economics, Institute of Education]. Moscow: NIU VShE Publ., 2020 56 p.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?