This paper discusses problems affecting philosophical and educational aspects of the formation of adaptation mechanism of a human considered as a biosocial system. In the core of authors’reflections lies a belief that education and training is a process of continuous improvementof a human. Authors substantiate the idea according to which the continued growth and development of the individual are attributive characteristics of the adaptation process as a set of components of a productive in teraction between the individual and the environment, self-actualization, self-development and self-organization of people in a particular social setting. From the standpoint of Philosophy authors treat adaptation as a social phenomenon, a form of interaction between the individual and the social group with the environment in which the coordinated and consistent requirements and expectations of its members. Authors emphasize that the system of education and training, inparticular in philosophical aspect, is intended to form a new identity as well as another, different from the present, image of worldorder. Emphasis is put that a modern man, especially an individual of the new generation, is not a passive contemplative, but an activeactor of political change, a form of expression which is a course on the development of a progressive institution of social life, which is an association of free and equal individuals, the rate of development of civil society. Authors conclude that education and training are closely interrelated processes of continuous improvement of man, in other words – improvement of bio-social skills of an individual, and, respectively, of human populations.
education, breeding, knowledge, adaptation, biosocial system, values, harmony, environment.
Ведущую роль в процессе социализации человека в обществе играет система образования, которая является основополагающим компонентом прогрессивного развития любого общества, реализует производительный механизм трансляции накопленных знаний и культурных ценностей от поколения к поколению. Готовя человека к любой сфере общественной деятельности, образование выступает мощным медиативным фактором процесса взаимоотношений между индивидом, окружающей средой и обществом.
Нельзя не согласиться с американским социологом Д. Беллом, который называет знание «осью» постиндустриального общества. По его мнению, «знание необходимо для функционирования любого общества. ... Подобно тому как фирма (предприятие) была ключевым инструментом последние сотни лет, благодаря ее роли в организации массового производства товаров или вещей, университет или любая другая форма институционализации знания будет центральным институтом в последующие сотни лет благодаря своей роли источника инноваций и знания» [2].
Система образования – сложный, динамичный, полиаспектный комплекс взаимосвязей людей, объединенных процессом передачи и приобретения знаний.
1. Aristotel. Nikomahova etika [Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics]. Moscow, EKSMO-Press Publ., 1997. Available at: http://www.lib.ru/POEEAST/ARISTOTEL/nikomah.txt
2. Bell D. Sotsialnyie ramki informatsionnogo obschestva [The social framework of the information society]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1986. Available at: http://www.alt-future.narod.ru/Future/bell.htm
3. Kalnoy I.I., Gorban A.V. Grazhdanskoe obschestvo v epohu totalnoy globalizatsii [Civil society in the era of total globalization]. Simferopol: ARIAL Publ., 2011.
4. Kuznetsov P.S. Adaptatsiya kak funktsiya razvitiya lichnosti [Adaptation as a function of personality development]. Saratov, Saratov University Publ., 1991. Available at: http://kfurgeto.pixub.com/379.html
5. Leont´ev A. N. Izbrannyie psihologicheskie proizvedeniya v 2 t. [Selected psychological works in 2 v.]. V. 1. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 1983.
6. Lozhkomoeva E.N., Nechaeva T.V. Razrabotka organizatsionno-ekonomicheskogo mehanizma promyishlennyih predpriyatiy: problemyi terminologii i modelirovaniya [Development of organizational-economic mechanism of industrial enterprises: problems of terminology and modeling]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta priborostroeniya i informatiki [Bulletin of the Moscow State University of Instrument Engineering and Informatics]. I. 16. Series «Socio-economic sciences». 2009, pp. 81-96.
7. Moiseev N.N. Izbrannyie trudyi: V 2 t. T. 2. Mezhdistsiplinarnyie issledovaniya globalnyih problem. Publitsistika i obschestvennyie problemyi [Selected Works: In 2 volumes. V. 2. Interdisciplinary research on global problems. Journalism and social problem]. Moscow, Taydeks Ko Publ., 2003.
8. Pechchei A. Chelovecheskie kachestva [Human qualities]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1985.
9. Rozzak T. Golos Zemli [Voice of the Earth]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2001.
10. Sele G. Ocherki ob adaptatsionnom syndrome [Essays on the adaptation syndrome]. Moscow, Medgiz Publ., 1960.
11. Tischenko N.D. Estestvennaya i sotsialnaya adaptatsiya cheloveka. Kand. Diss. [Natural and social adaptation]. Chita, 2012.
12. Filosofiya biologii: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. Pamyati Reginyi Semenovnyi Karpinskoy [The philosophy of biology: yesterday, today and tomorrow. PamyatiReginy Semyonovna Karpinskaya]. Moscow, IFRAN Publ., 1996.
13. Shestov L. Apofeoz bespochvennosti. Opyit adogmaticheskogo myishleniya [apotheosis of groundlessness. Experience adogmatic thinking]. LGU Publ., 1991.
