SUBJECTIVE APPROACH TO ASSESSMENT QUALITY OF WORKING LIFE OF WORKING-AGE POPULATION OF THE REGION
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The article studies the issue of assessment quality of work life of the population (QWL) on the basis of a subjective approach. The article indicates relevance of the debate surrounding the category of «quality of work life», gives an overview of methods of assessment quality of work life of the population, corresponding to the subjective approach, substantiates the possibility of assessment quality of work life within of a subjective approach based on indicators of satisfaction with aspects of work life. The author developed a methodology for assessing the quality of working life of the population, involving the use of sociological survey tools and the Likert scale. The methodology was tested based on the data of the sociological poll «The monitoring of the labor potential quality», conducted with the direct participation of the author in 2018. According to the results, it was revealed that the composite index of QWL was 0.254, i.e. more than half of the working-age population of the Vologda Oblast are satisfied with the current quality of life in their workplace. The article highlights that all partial indices take positive values, i.e. the majority of respondents are more or less satisfied with the components of the quality of work life. Private indices of employment stability and psychological climate in the organization are of greatest importance, private indices of remuneration of labor and career opportunities are least. The author also discovers the differences in the assessment of QWL by socio-demographic characteristics, level of education and the characteristics of employment.

Keywords:
quality of work life, job satisfaction, region, working-age population, sociological survey, index
References

1. Trifonov B. Towards the appropriate transformation of russian social security system. Obshchestvo i ekonomika [The journal "Society and Economics"], 2018, no. 10, pp. 25-35. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31857/S020736760002275-1. URL: www.dx.doi.org/10.31857/S020736760002275-1 (in Russian).

2. Swamy D.R., Nanjundeswaraswamy T.S., Rashmi S. Quality of Work Life: Scale Development and Validation. International Journal of Caring Sciences. 2015, Vol. 8, Is. 2, May-August. Pp. 281-300.

3. Denvir A., Hillage J., Cox A., Sinclair A., Pearmain D. Quality of Working Life in the UK. The Institute for Employment Studies, 2008. URL: https://www.employment-studies.co.uk/system/files/resources/files/452.pdf (accessed 19 September 2019).

4. Wright T.A., Bonett D.G. Job satisfaction and psychological well-being as non-additive predictors of workplace turnover. Journal of Management. 2007, Vol. 33, No. 2. Pp. 141-160. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306297582. URL: www.dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206306297582

5. Galinsky E., Stein P.J. The impact of human resources policies on employees: balancing work/family life. Journal of Family Issues. 1990, No. 11 (4). Pp. 368-383. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/019251390011004002. URL: www.dx.doi.org/10.1177/019251390011004002

6. Benedict R., Taylor CA. Managing the overlap of work and family: a shared responsibility. CUPA Journal. 1995, Vol. 46, No. 3, Fall. Pp. 1-9.

7. Chan K.W., Wyatt T.A. Quality of work life: a study of employees in Shanghai, China. Asia Pacific Business Review. 2007, Vol. 13, No. 4. Pp. 501-517. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13602380701250681. URL: www.dx.doi.org/10.1080/13602380701250681

8. Belekhova G.V., Rossoshanskii A.I., Chekmareva E.A. Opportunities to improve living standard of the population due to the growth of wages. Voprosy territorial'nogo razvitiya [Territorial development issues], 2015, no. 8 (28). Available at: http://vtr.isert-ran.ru/article/1632 (Accessed 19 September 2019). (in Russian).

9. Novokreshchenova N.A. Formirovanie sistemy ocenki udovletvorennosti personala vuza. Kand, Diss. [Formation of a system for assessing the satisfaction of university staff. Kand. Diss.]. Saransk, 2014. 244 p. (in Russian).

10. Corel L.V., Kombarov V.Yu. The Quality of working life on the modern industrial enterprise (the results of a survey of engineers). EKO [EKO], 2011, no. 10, pp. 102-117. (in Russian).

11. Salahutdinova R.R. Labor life quality of agricultural workers. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies], 2009, no. 11, pp. 45-55. (in Russian).

12. Perfilieva M.B. Prerequisites for managing the quality of working life. Zhurnal sociologii i social'noj antropologii [Journal of sociology and social anthropology], 2010, no. 2, pp. 116-124. (in Russian).

13. Cherkashina T.Yu. Subjective quality of life: integrated and particular indicators. Region: ekonomika i sociologiya [Region: Economics and Sociology], 2006, no. 3, pp. 97-111. (in Russian).

14. Zholudeva V.V., Melnichenko N.F. Statistical evaluation of the quality of working life of employees in the Russian Federation. Statistika i ekonomika [Statistics and Economics], 2018, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 42-51. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2018-4-42-51. URL: https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2018-4-42-51 (in Russian).

15. Chekmareva E.A. Review of modern measurement methods of quality of population’s working life. Kachestvo i zhizn' [Quality and Life], 2016, no.4, pp. 53-61. (in Russian).

16. Zonova O.V. Quality of labor life: definition and criteria of evaluation. Problemy sovremennoj ekonomiki [Problems of modern economics], 2010, no. 3, pp. 79-81. (in Russian).

17. Easton S., Van Laar D. QoWL (Quality of working wife) - what, how, and why? Psychology Research. 2013, Vol. 3, No. 10. Pp. 596-605.

18. Ramawickrama J., Opatha H., PushpaKumari M. Quality of work wife, job satisfaction, and the facets of the relationship between the two constructs. International Business Research. 2017, Vol. 10, No. 4. Pp. 167-182. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v10n4p167. URL: www.dx.doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v10n4p167

19. Egorova E.G. Social'nye indikatory kachestva trudovoj zhizni v strukture upravlencheskih reshenij organizacii. Kand, Aftoref. [Social indicators of the quality of working life in the structure of management decisions of the organization. Kand. Aftoref.]. St. Petersburg, 2008. 20 p. (in Russian).

20. Milyaeva L.G., Dambovskaya A.A. High quality of industrious life is the pledge of effective interaction between employee and employer. Ivestiya IGEA [Bulletin of Baikal State University], 2010, no. 4, pp. 157-160. (in Russian).

21. Milyaeva L.G. Methodological approaches to assessing the quality of working life of the organization’s personnel. Polzunovskij al'manah, 2009, no. 1, pp. 149-155. (in Russian).

22. Andruhov V. Quality of a labour life - a basis of increase of efficiency of work. V mire nauchnyh otkrytij [In the World of Scientific Discoveries], 2011, no. 6, pp. 11-22. (in Russian).

23. Zhulina E.G. Labor Motivation and its impact on the quality of working life. Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo social'no-ekonomicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Saratov state socio-economic University], 2009, no. 3, pp. 153-157. (in Russian).

24. Apen'ko S.N., Zhelnovach M.V. Monitoring the quality of work life of University teachers on the basis of consulting projects. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya «Ekonomika» [Bulletin of Omsk University. Series «Economics»], 2014, no. 1, pp. 66-70. (in Russian).

25. Ryabov V.B. The quality of working life and occupational well-being. Institut psihologii Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Organizacionnaya psihologiya i psihologiya truda [Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Organizational Psychology and Labor Psychology], 2018, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 79-95. (in Russian).

26. Toksanbaeva M.S. Social'nye interesy rabotnikov i ispol'zovanie trudovogo potenciala [Social interests of employees and the use of the labour potential]. Moscow. Science Publ., 2006. 259 p. (in Russian).

27. Yudina N.A. Psychological Approach to Study of Subjective Quality of Life. Izvestiya Ural'skogo federal'nogo universiteta. Ser. 1, Problemy obrazovaniya, nauki i kul'tury [Izvestia Ural Federal University Journal. series 1. issues in education, science and culture], 2017, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 104-110. (in Russian).

28. Volkova M.I. Ob"ektivnye i sub"ektivnye determinanty kachestva zhizni naseleniya Rossii i stran Evropy. Kand, Diss. [Objective and subjective determinants of the quality of life of the population of Russia and European countries. Kand. Diss.]. Moscow, 2018. 175 p. (in Russian).

29. Adamchuk V.V., Romashov O.V., Sorokina M.E. Ekonomika i sociologiya truda: uchebnik dlya vuzov [Economics and sociology of labor: a textbook for universities]. Moscow, YUniti Publ., 1998. 407 p. (in Russian).

30. Lebedinceva E.S. The level of employee satisfaction. Upravlenie personalom [Human Resource Management], 2007, no. 9, pp. 75-78. (in Russian).

31. Belekhova G.V., Babich L.V., Chekmareva E.A. Theoretical and methodological foundations of the study of the category “Quality of Working Life”. Social'noe prostranstvo [Social area], 2017, no. 3. Available at: http://socialarea-journal.ru/article/2311 (Accessed 19 September 2019). (in Russian).

Login or Create
* Forgot password?