We propose a method for determining location and orientation of extended solar sources of magnetic clouds, using coronagraph data and SOHO EIT/MDI images of the photosphere. To estimate the probability of formation of magnetic clouds, we use a simple cylindrical force-free model. We have established that more extended sources and those having a slight inclination to the solar equator and located on the solar limb as compared to those that are nonextended and strongly inclined can generate expanding clouds, which with high probability can reach the magnetosphere like clouds from a source near the zero meridian and low latitudes. We determine the relationship between extreme values of substorm activity and parameters of solar sources under study during the impact of magnetic clouds on Earth’s magnetosphere from the AL index. We note that there are no substorms associated with extended sources outside the heliolatitude range ~5–20°. The established relationship between solar source coordinates and geomagnetic activity of the magnetic cloud sheath and body are consistent with the most probable distribution of magnetoactive regions over the solar disk.
solar activity, solar wind, coronal plasma flow, coronal mass ejection, solar flare, geomagnetic activity, geomagnetic disturbances, magnetosphere
1. Barkhatov N.A., Kalinina E.A. Determination of magnetic cloud parameters and prediction of magnetic storm intensity. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy. 2010, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 453–460. DOI: 10.1134/S0016793210040043.
2. Barkhatov N.A., Kalinina E.A., Levitin A.E. Manifestation of configurations of magnetic clouds of the solar wind in geomagnetic activity. Cosmic Res. 2009, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 268–278.
3. Barkhatov N.A., Revunova E.A., Vinogradov A.B. Effect of orientation of the solar wind magnetic clouds on the seasonal variation of geomagnetic activity. Cosmic Res. 2014a, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 269–277. DOI: 10.1134/S0010952514040017.
4. Barkhatov N.A., Revunova E.A., Levitin A.E. Classification of space-weather complexes based on solar source type, characteristics of plasma flow, and geomagnetic perturbation induced by it. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy. 2014b, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 173–179. DOI: 10.1134/S0016793214020030.
5. Barkhatov N.A., Vorobjev V.G., Revunov S.E., Yagodkina O.I. Effect of solar dynamics parameters on the formation of substorm activity. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy. 2017, vol. 57, iss. 3, pp. 251–256. DOI: 10.1134/S0016793217030021.
6. Barkhatov N.A., Revunov S.E., Vorobjev V.G., Yagodkina O.I. Studying the relationship between high-latitude geomagnetic activity and parameters of interplanetary magnetic clouds with the use of artificial neural networks. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy. 2018, vol. 58, iss. 2, pp. 147–153. DOI: 10.1134/S0016793218020020.
7. Barkhatova O.M., Kosolapova N.V., Barkhatov N.A., Revunov S.E. Synchronization of geomagnetic and ionospheric disturbances over Kazan station. Solar-Terrestrial Physics. 2017, vol. 3, iss. 4, pp. 58–66. DOI: 10.12737/stp-34201706.
8. Burlaga L.F., Wang C., Richardson J.D., Ness N.F. Evolution of the multiscale statistical properties of corotating streams from 1 to 95 AU. J. Geophys. Res. 2003, vol. 108, no. A7, pp. 1305–1310. DOI: 10.1029/2003JA009841.
9. Hundhausen A.J. Coronal mass ejections. The many faces of the Sun: A summary of the results from NASA’s Solar maximum mission. N.Y. Springer, 1999. 143 p.
10. Ivanov K.G. Solar sources of interplanetary plasma flows in the Earth’s orbit. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy. 1996, vol. 36, p. 19. (In Russian).
11. Kilpua E.K.J., Lee C.O., Luhmann J.G., Li Y. Interplanetary coronal mass ejections in the near-Earth solar wind during the minimum periods following solar cycles 22 and 23. Ann. Geophys. 2011, vol. 29, pp. 1455–1467. DOI: 10.5194/angeo-29-1455-2011.
12. Kilpua E.K.J., Li Y., Luhmann J.G., Jian L.K., Russell C.T. On the relationship between magnetic cloud field polarity and geoeffectiveness. Ann. Geophys. 2012, vol. 30, pp. 1037–1050. DOI: 10.5194/angeo-30-1037-2012.
13. Liu Y., Manchester IV W.B., Richardson J.D., Luhmann J.G., Lin R.P., Bale S.D. Deflection flows ahead of ICMEs as an indicator of curvature and geoeffectiveness. J. Geophys. Res. 2008, vol. 113, iss. A9, CiteID A00B03. DOI: 10.1029/2007JA012996.
14. Manakova Yu.V., Pekhteleva K.A., Barkhatov N.A., Revunov S.E. Space-time analysis of disturbances in the PC4-5 period range during magnetic storms by correlation-skeleton method. Vestnik Miniskogo universiteta [Vestnik of Minin University]. 2016, no. 1, pp. 1–6. (In Russian).
15. Neugebauer M., Liewer P.C. Creation and destruction of transitory coronal holes and their fast solar wind streams. J. Geophys. Res. 2003, vol. 108, no. A1, pp. 1013–1016. DOI: 10.1029/2002JA009326.
16. Nikolaeva N.S., Yermolaev Y.I., Lodkina I.G. Dependence of geomagnetic activity during magnetic storms on the solar wind parameters for different types of streams. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy. 2011, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 49–65. DOI: 10.1134/S0016793211010099.
17. Riazantseva M.O., Dalin P.A., Zastenker G.N., Parhomov V.A., Eselevich V.G., Eselevich M.V., Richardson J. Properties of sharp and large changes in the ion flux (density) of the solar wind. Cosmic Res. 2003, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 371–381.
18. Wang Yuming, Chen Caixia, Gui Bin, Shen Chenglong, Ye Pinzhong, Wang S. Statistical study of coronal mass ejection source locations: Understanding CMEs viewed in coronagraphs. J. Geophys. Res. 2011, vol. 116, iss. A4, CiteID A04104. DOI: 10.1029/2010JA016101.
19. Wu C. C., Lepping R. P. Effects of magnetic clouds on the occurrence of geomagnetic storms: The first 4 years of Wind. J. Geophys. Res. 2002, vol. 107, no. A10, pp. 1314–1321. DOI: 10.1029/2001JA000161.
20. URL: http://lasco-www.nrl.na-vy.mil/index.php?p=con-tent/cmelist (accessed May 6, 2019).
21. URL: https://cdaw.gsfc.nasa.gov/CME_list (accessed May 6, 2019).
22. URL: http://umtof.umd.edu/sem (accessed May 6, 2019).
23. URL: ftp://ftp.ngdc.noaa.gov/STP/SOLAR_DATA (accessed May 6, 2019).
24. URL: http://vso.nso.edu/cgi/catalogue (accessed May 6, 2019).