Russian Federation
In the conditions of system transformations of an education system the contradiction between requirement of society for the teachers of a new formation acting as the guarantor of quality education, and a fragmentariness of the quality training of students at university which isn’t providing fully the social order convinces of need of formation at students of evidence-based, integrative knowledge in the fi eld of quality assessment as element of professional competence. In the article results of modeling of process of formation of quality competence of future teachers and heads of the educational organizations are stated. At the same time pedagogical modeling in the context of the publication is understood as development of the purposes (the general idea) of creation of required pedagogical process and the main ways of their achievement. At creation of model authors were guided by the experience of pedagogical researches, general scientifi c requirements relating to process of modeling and personal practice of formation the quality of competences of university. The presented model gives the chance of transfer of the obtained data in real practice by means of adaptation to specifi c objectives of quality education in the conditions of implementation of professional educational programs of preparation of pedagogical shots.
education, quality, competence, competence, teacher.
Одной из наиболее значимых проблем на современном этапе системного реформирования образования в России является проблема оценки качества образования, поскольку становится очевидным тот факт, что уровень подготовки будущих специалистов все в большей степени зависит от того, как организовано управление качеством образования, насколько объективно оцениваются достигнутые результаты, насколько они адекватны социально-экономическим целям страны.
1. Aldoshina M.I. Universitetskoe obrazovanie i problema kachestva nepreryvnogo obrazovanij a [University education and problem of quality of continuous education]. NovaInfo.Ru [NovaInfo.Ru]. 2017, I. 59. Available at: http://novainfo.ru/article/111262016.
2. Aldoshina M.I., Grishina Ju.V. Obrazovatel’nyy klaster kak model’ nepreryvnogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya v universitete [Educational cluster as а model of continuous pedagogical education at university]. Innovatsii v obrazovanii [Innovations in education]. 2017, I. 2, pp. 11-24.
3. 3. Belova I.O., Koshlaj G.P., Timofeeva A.V. Aktual’nost’ formirovanij a kvalitologicheskoj kompetentnosti rukovoditelej i pedagogov v svete sovremennyh trebo-vanij [Relevance of formation of kvalitologichesky competence of heads and teachers of light modern requirements]. Municipal’noe obrazovanie: innovacii i jeksperiment [Municipality: innovations and experiment]. 2015, I. 2, pp. 46-49.
4. Kolesnikova I.A. Pedagogicheskoe proektirovanie [Pedagogical design]. Moscow, Izdatel’skij centr «Akademij a» Publ., 2005. 288 p.
5. Kraevskij V.V., Lerner I.Ja. Didakticheskie osnovanij a opredelenij a soderzhanij a uchebnika [Didactic bases of determination of content of the textbook]. Moscow, Prosveshhenie Publ., 1980, pp. 34-49.
6. Boziev R.S. Metodologij a nauchnogo issledovanij a v pedagogike [Methodology of scientifi c research in pedagogics]. Moscow, Publ. Planeta, 2016. 208 p.
7. Naumenko O.V., Chandra M.Yu. Sovremennye podkhody k formirovaniyu fonda otsenochnykh sredstv po osnovnym obrazovatel’nym programmam vuza [Current Approaches on Forming the Assessment Tools Stock for Basic University Curricula]. Standarty i monitoring v obrazovanii [Standards and monitoring in education]. 2016, V. 4, I. 1, pp. 8-18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/17981
8. Sergeev N.K. Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie uchitelja: teorij a i praktika [Continuous education of the teacher: theory and practice]. Volgograd, Print Publ., 2016. 360 p.
9. Safonova O. A. Kvalitologicheskoe obrazovanie budushchego pedagoga [Qualitologic education of a future teacher]. Izvestij a Penzenskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. V.G. Belinskogo [News of the Penza state pedagogical university of V.G. Belinsky]. 2012, I. 28, pp. 1038-1041.
10. Safonova O.A., Shilova G.A. Kvalitologicheskaya kompetentnost’ rukovoditelya [Quality competence of a leader]. Srednee professional’noe obrazovanie [Secondary professional education]. 2008, I. 9, pp. 58-60.
11. Sergeeva E.V. Monitoring uchebnyh dostizhenij studentov v sisteme upravlenij a kachestvom obrazovatel’nogo processa v pedagogicheskom vuze. Kand. Diss. [Monitoring of educational achievements of students in a control system of quality of educational process in pedagogical higher education institution. Kand. Diss.]. Volgograd, 2011. 184 p.
12. Slastenin V.A. Kachestvo obrazovanij a kak social’no- pedagogicheskij fenomen [Quality of education as social and pedagogical phenomenon]. Sibirskij pedagogicheskij zhurnal [Siberian pedagogical magazine]. 2004, I. 3, pp. 3-12.
13. Subetto A.I. Kvalitologij a obrazovanij a (osnovanij a, sintez) [Science about quality of education (bases, synthesis)]. St Petersburg, Moscow, Issled. centr problem kachestva podgotovki specialistov Publ., 2000. 223 p.
14. Hutorskoj A.V., Hutorskaja L.N. Kompetentnost’ kak didakticheskoe ponjatie: soderzhanie, struktura i modeli konstruirovanij a [Competence as didactic concept: contents, structure and models of designing]. Vestnik instituta obrazovanij a cheloveka [Bulletin of institute of education of the person]. 2015, I. 2. Available at: http://иоч.рф/journal/ 2015/200/Eidos-Vestnik2015-216-Khutorskaya- Khutorskoy.pdf
15. Jamburg E.A. Chto prineset uchitelju novyj professional’nyj standart pedagoga? [What will the new professional standard of the teacher bring to the teacher?]. Moscow, Prosveshhenie Publ., 2014. 175 p.
