PROBLEMS OF MINIMIZING THE NEGATIVE ECONOMIC IMPACT ON THE STATE POLICY
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The article describes the possible ways of internal and external protection of the state from the economic impact of international and supranational economic entities, economic elites of other countries that may have a detrimental effect on its policy and the choice of development strategy. The article proposes specific ways to minimize the impact of economic factors, influencing the state policy. The author believes that to overcome the negative effects of globalization, the state must ensure the implementation of the legal regime, the institutionalization of methods and forms of market infrastructure protection. In particular, it is noted that to minimize the negative impact of the international financial organizations, the government needs to move away from the economy that is focused mainly on export, to transfer the production of vital goods to the local area. Another current trend is considered to be the overcoming of the negative impact of economic sanctions, possibly through the introduction of a national payment system, the development of the state order, state subsidies and support of import substitution. In general, the author comes to the conclusion that minimizing of the negative impact of economic factors on the governmental policy is possible in the case of providing the highest possible level of the economic sovereignty.

Keywords:
economic sovereignty, globalization, international financial institutions, political elites, negative economic impact on policy, economic sanctions, international financial organizations, multinational companies, import substitution
References

1. Andreeva O.V., Shevchik E.V., Selivanova A.G. Institutsionalizatsiya novoy modeli finansovogo povedeniya promyshlennykh kompaniy kak mekhanizm obespecheniya ekonomicheskogo suvereniteta Rossii. Terra Economicus. - 2014. - № 2. - S. 13-18.

2. Balyuk I. A. O probleme regulirovaniya suverennoy vneshney zadolzhennosti. Finansy i uchet. - 2016. - № 4. - S. 68-73.

3. Boldyrev Yu. Nachinat´ nado s mirovozzrencheskikh tseley i motivov. Mir peremen. Spetsial´nyy vypusk. - 2015. - S. 26-27.

4. Brega A.V., Kopylov I.A. Transnatsionalizatsiya politicheskoy elity i vliyanie etogo protsessa na suverenitet gosudarstva. Vlast´. - 2014. - № 11. - S. 77-83.

5. Buzin A.Yu. Evolyutsiya elektoral´nykh pokazateley rossiyskikh vyborov v 1996-2012 godakh. Polis. - 2014. - № 6. - S. 62-70.

6. Inozemtsev V. V Rossii net ekonomicheskoy politiki. Mir peremen. Spetsial´nyy vypusk. - 2015. - S. 55-61.

7. Ismagilov R.F. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost´ Rossii: teoriya i praktika. - SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 2009. - 135 s.

8. Kulakova T.A. Politika izmeneniy: administrativnye reformy i vzaimodeystvie gosudarstva i obshchestva. - SPb.: SPbGU, 2011. - 357 s.

9. Minchev M. Bezopasnost´ Rossii - ugrozy i perspektivy. Sovremennaya nauchnaya mysl´. - 2013. - № 3. - S. 159-170.

10. Mikhaylenok O.M. Natsional´nyy suverenitet i rossiyskiy federalizm. Vlast´. - 2010. - №3. - S. 3-9.

11. Mikhaylenok O.M. Potentsial strategicheskoy kul´tury i kachestvo politicheskoy elity. Elitologiya i strategii razvitiya sovremennoy Rossii: materialy Vtorogo Vserossiyskogo elitologicheskogo kongressa s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem 21-22 oktyabrya 2016 g., Rostov-na-Donu, red.- izd. gr.: A.Yu. Shutov (rukov.), O.V. Lokota, S.G. Eremeev, A.V. Ponedelkov, O.F. Shabrov, A.V. Burov i dr. Tom 1. - Rostov n/D: Izd-vo YuRIU RANKhiGS, 2016. - S. 439-453.

12. Nisnevich Yu.A. Publichnaya vlast´ i korruptsiya: sotsial´no-antropologicheskiy podkhod. Polis. - 2014. - №6. - S. 32-35.

13. Ovchinnikov A.I., Polyakova A.S. Gosudarstvennaya ideologiya Rossii i osnovnye printsipy formirovaniya natsional´noy politicheskoy elity. Vestnik VGUES. - 2015. - № 3. - S. 77-85.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?