Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The article analyzes the issues of differentiation of responsibility and norm design technique on inchoate crime in the criminal legislation of the Republic of Belarus. The author examines the legislative definition of preparation for a crime, attempted crime and voluntary renunciation of criminal purpose. As a result of the study the author has found out the main methods and means of legislative technique, used by the Belarusian legislator. These are abstract and casuistic methods, the terminology of the criminal law and several others. Comparison of legal regulation of norms on unfinished crime in the Criminal code of the Republic of Belarus and the Criminal code of the Russian Federation has allowed to identify gaps made by the legislators of both countries in application of specific tools and techniques of legislative drafting. Court practice of the Republic of Belarus in cases of preparation for a crime and attempted crime also was analyzed in present article. The author has evidentiated the means of differentiation of the responsibility for committing inchoate crime, used by the Belarusian legislator. The definitions “inchoate crime” and “stage of the crime” were also analyzed in present study. As a conclusion the author has made the recommendations for improving the criminal legislation of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus on regulation of criminal responsibility for an inchoate crime.

Keywords:
inchoate crime, differentiation of responsibility, criminal law, Republic of Belarus.
References

1. Babiy N. A. Ugolovnoe pravo Respubliki Belarus´. Obshchaya chast´: uchebnik. Minsk, 2010.

2. Kozlov A. P. Neokonchennoe prestuplenie: ucheb. posobie. Krasnoyarsk, 1999.

3. Sarkisova E. A. Ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast´: ucheb. posobie. Minsk, 2005.

4. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii: chast´ Obshchaya / pod red. L. L. Kruglikova. M., 2012.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?