Tula, Tula, Russian Federation
The paper evaluates the connectivity of the economic systems of the two federal districts of the country by studying the relationship between income values and income growth rates in the regions of Siberia and the Far East using mathematical statistics and econometrics. The coherence of economic development in the regions of the Siberian Federal District has been relatively stable in recent years. The connectivity of the economic development of the regions of the Far Eastern Federal District has increased in recent years. In 2015, the average per capita income in the regions of the Siberian Federal District differed by 1.74 times, in 2024 – by 1.73 times. In 2015, the average per capita income in the regions of the Far Eastern Federal District varied 2.7 times, but by 2024, income differences had increased significantly to 4.2 times. One of the important factors in the growth of income inequality in the regions of the Far East has been the accelerated growth of the extractive industry in the regions, while reducing the share of the manufacturing industry. Appropriate regional economic policy, including industrial policy, is needed to overcome differences in the level of economic development of the regions of the Far Eastern Federal District.
income, income growth, correlation, regions, industry structure
1. Danilova I.V. Vliyanie mezhterritorial'noy svyazannosti na razvitie ekonomicheskogo prostranstva regionov [Tekst] / I.V. Danilova, I.P. Savel'eva, A.V. Rezepin // Ekonomika regiona. — 2022. — T. 18. — Vyp. 1. S. 31–48. – URL: https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-1-3
2. Konischev E.S. Analiz podhodov k povysheniyu mezhregional'noy svyazannosti sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federacii [Tekst] / E.S. Konischev // Ekonomika, predprinimatel'stvo i pravo. – 2024. – T. 14. – № 12. – S. 71337146. — DOI:https://doi.org/10.18334/epp.14.12.122193
3. Basovskiy L.E. Prognozirovanie i planirovanie v usloviyah rynka [Tekst] / L.E. Basovskiy. — M.: INFRA-M, 2004.
4. Casti John. Connectivity, Complexity, and Catastrophe in large-scale Systems. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. 1979. 208 p.
5. Accinelli Elvio, Anyul Martin P. Can Catastrophe Theory Become a New Tool in Understanding Singular Economies? // New Tools of Economic Dynamics. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 2005. Vol. 551, pp. 95–109.
6. Rosser J., Barkley Jr. Aspects of dialectics and non-linear Dynamics // Cambridge Journal of Economics. 2000. № 24. pp. 311–324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/24.3.311
7. Poston T., Stewart I. Catastrophe Theory and Its Applications. Dover Publications, 2012. 584 p.
8. Gilmore R. Catastrophe Theory for Scientists and Engineers. Courier Dover Publications, 1993. 666 p.
9. Basovskaya E.N. Svyaznost' ekonomicheskoy sistemy Rossii: ekonometricheskie ocenki [Tekst] / E.N. Basovskaya // Nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki. Ekonomika. 2015. — № 2. — S. 21–23. — DOI: https://doi. org/10.12737/10838 (data obrascheniya: 27.04.2026).
