Sevastopol State University (Leading researcher)
Moscow, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
The purpose of the article is to identify the features of Western theories concerning the problems of digital transformation of political processes. The authors use the principles of the hermeneutic method, which is necessary to identify and analyze key ideas and the specifics of Western theoretical constructions explaining the mechanisms of digital transformation of the political sphere and its specific political processes. The hermeneutic method is combined by the authors with the techniques of critical discourse analysis of academic literature. By systematically sorting and evaluating the key propositions and internal tensions of major theoretical clusters, covering five aspects - power politics, state, democratic participation, political propaganda, and international relations - a systematic examination of Western theories concerning the digital transformation of political processes is conducted. These theoretical constructs, while demonstrating their insights, also reveal some common characteristics and limitations. The conclusions emphasize that many Western theories implicitly follow the philosophy of technological determinism, tending to portray digital technologies as a kind of transformational force with an internal and almost autonomous logic. This can lead to an underestimation of the regulatory role of political, economic and social institutions in the application of technology, ignoring the sustainability of politics itself, human subjectivity and the multiplicity of ways of global development. This study is not only aimed at mapping the current situation in Western theoretical constructs, but also seeks to identify common boundaries of explanatory ability and potential blind spots in order to lay the foundation for the search for a more balanced and objective analytical framework between technological accelerationism and political reflection. The authors also propose analyzing profound changes in political sphere through the category of digital transformation, rather than just digitalization. The study confirmed the author's assumption that Western theories, considering the political sphere within the framework of the usual category of digitalization, describe more fundamental, far-reaching consequences for government and politics, in fact, addressing the problem of digital transformation of political processes. However, further steps in the analysis of the digital transformation of the political sphere and its processes are limited by the technological determinism of Western theoretical constructs, which means the need to rethink such theories and their terminological tools.
Western political science, digital transformation, political process, political sphere, digitalization, Western political theories, digitalization of politics, digitalization of power, algorithms, theories of digitalization
1. Borisenkov A.A. O politicheskom processe // Sociodinamika. - 2012. - № 3. - S. 101-129. DOI:https://doi.org/10.7256/2306-0158.2012.3.23.
2. Varufakis Ya. Tehnofeodalizm: chto ubilo kapitalizm. / Per s angl. - M.: Ad Marginem Press, 2025. - 304 s.
3. Denisova T.Yu. Aporiya sud'by ili byli li greki fatalistami? // Idei i idealy. - 2014. - T. 1. - № 3(21). - S. 57–70.
4. Din Dzh. Kommunizm ili neofeodalizm? // Logos. - 2019. - T. 29. - №6. - S. 85-116.
5. Zuboff Sh. Epoha nadzornogo kapitalizma. Bitva za chelovecheskoe buduschee na novyh rubezhah vlasti. / Per. s angl. - M.: Izd. Inst. Gaydara, 2022. - 784 s.
6. Koulman S. Mozhet li Internet ukrepit' demokratiyu? /Per. s angl. - SPb.: Aleteyya, 2018. - 132 s.
7. Lovink G. V plenu platformy. Kak nam vernut' sebe internet. /Per. s angl. A. Kartashov, N. Kotik. - M.: Ad Marginem, 2024. - 232 s.
8. Maccukato M. Cennost' vseh veschey: Sozdanie i iz'yatie v mirovoy ekonomike. / Per. s angl. - M.: Izd. dom. VShE, 2021. - 408 s.
9. Metodicheskie podhody politologicheskogo issledovaniya i metateoreticheskie osnovy politicheskoy teorii. / Sost. N. Konegen, K. Shubert. - M.: ROSSPEN, 2004. - 220 s.
10. Adler-Nissen R., Eggeling K.A. Blended Diplomacy: The Entanglement and Contestation of Digital Technologies in Everyday Diplomatic Practice // European Journal of International Relations. - 2022. - Vol. 28. - Iss. 3. - P. 640-666. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661221107837.
11. Amoore L. Because the twin is not a copy: On the politics of digital twins // New Media & Society. - 2025. - Vol. 27. - Iss. 8. - P. 4549-4564. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251338284.
12. Aneesh A. Global labor: Algocratic modes of organization // Sociological Theory. - 2009. - Vol. 27.- Iss. 4. - P. 347-370. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01352. x.
13. Argyle L.P., Busby E.C., Fulda N., Gubler J.R., Rytting C., Wingate D. Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samples // Political Analysis. - 2023. - Vol. 31. - Iss. 3. - P. 337-351. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2023.2.
14. August V. Political ideas of the network society: why digitalization research needs critical conceptual analysis // Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft. - 2022. - Vol. - 32. - P. 313–335. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s41358-021-00305-z.
15. Beer D. The social power of algorithms // Information, Communication & Society. - 2017. - Vol. 20. - Iss. 1. - P. 1–13. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1216147.
16. Beer D. The problem of researching a recursive society: Algorithms, data coils and the looping of the social // Big Data & Society. - 2022. - Vol. 9. - Iss. 2. - DOI: 0.1177/20539517221104997. URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20539517221104997 (data obrascheniya: 09.01.2026).
17. Becerra M., Waisbord S.R. The curious absence of cybernationalism in Latin America: Lessons for the study of digital sovereignty and governance // Communication and the Public. - 2021. - Vol. - 6. - Iss. 1-4. - P. 67-79.- DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/20570473211046730.
18. Bellanova R. Digital, politics, and algorithms: Governing digital data through the lens of data protection: Governing digital data through the lens of data protection // European Journal of Social Theory. - 2016. - Vol. 20.- Iss. 3. - P. 329-347. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016679167.
19. Berg S., Hofmann J. Digital democracy // Internet Policy Review. - 2021. - Vol. 10. - Iss. 4. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.4.1612.
20. Berg S., Staemmler D., Thiel T. Political Theory of the Digital Constellation // Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft. - 2022. - Vol. 32. - P. 251-265. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s41358-022-00324-4.
21. Bratton B. The Stack: On Software and Sovereignty. - MIT Press, 2015. - 528 p.
22. Bremmer I. The Next Global Superpower Isn’t Who You Think // Foreign Policy. 2023. URL: https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/06/17/china-russia-us-multipolar-world-technology/ (data obrascheniya: 09.01.2026).
23. Danaher J. The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation // Philosophy and Technology. - 2016. - Vol. 29. - Iss. 3. - P. 245-268. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-015-0211-1.
24. Datta A. The digitalising state: Governing digitalisation-as-urbanisation in the Global South // Progress in Human Geography. - 2022. - Vol. 47. - Iss. 1. - P. 141-159. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325221141798.
25. Digital Totalitarianism: Algorithms and Society. / Ed. by M. Filimowicz. - London: Routledge, 2022. - 106 p.
26. Garbe L., Maerz S.F. The rise of authoritarian informationalism: escalating surveillance, manipulation, and control // Democratization. - 2026. - Vol. 33. - Iss. 1. - P. 1–18. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2025.2579105.
27. Gerbaudo P. The Digital Party: Political Organisation and Online Democracy. - Pluto Press, 2018. 240 p.
28. Gerbaudo P. The Platform Party: The Transformation of Political Organisation in the Era of Big Data // Digital Objects, Digital Subjects: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Capitalism, Labour and Politics in the Age of Big Data. / Ed. Dave Chandler, Christian Fuchs. London: University of Westminster Press, 2019. - P. 187-198. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/11941.
29. Gidlund K.L., Sundberg L. Undisclosed creators of digitalization: A critical analysis of representational practices // Information Polity. - 2021. - Vol. 26. - Iss. 1. - P. 3-20. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-200230.
30. Goodwin J., Jasper J.M. Caught in a Winding, Snarling Vine: The Structural Bias of Political Process Theory // Sociological Forum. - 1999. - Vol. 14. - Iss. 1. - P. 27-54.
31. Grohmann R., Costa Barbosa A. Sovereignty-as-a-service: How big tech companies co-opt and redefines digital sovereignty // Media, Culture & Society. - 2025. - 0(0). - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437251395003. URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/ 01634437251395003?__cf_chl_rt_tk=KvZMy4lmMFapgDIQwwpIGMlJi2GXN30Q8jLdgHjRIQc-1768418646-1.0.1.1-Qnt8bMdDB2hR88AxIe1j_9ihfeMKkcktyrnTMkafo20 (data obrascheniya: 09.01.2026).
32. Guyonneau R., Le Dez A. Artificial Intelligence in Digital Warfare: Introducing the Concept of the Cyberteammate // The Cyber Defense Review. 2019. - Vol. 4. - Iss. 2. - P. 103-116.
33. Hearn J., Niemistö C., Sjögren H. Hegemonic digitalisation in policy on older people: The Finnish case and wider social implications // The Sociological Review. - 2026. - 0(0). - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261251397300. URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00380261251397300 (data obrascheniya: 09.01.2026).
34. Kaufmann M., Jeandesboz J. Politics and ‘the digital’: From singularity to specificity // European Journal of Social Theory. - 2016. - Vol. 20. - Iss. 3. - P. 309-328. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016677976.
35. Kellner D. Globalisation from Below? Toward a Radical Democratic Technopolitics // Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities. - 1999. - Vol. 4. - Iss. 2. - P. 101-113. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09697259908572039.
36. Lechterman T.M. The Perfect Politician // AI Morality. Ed. by D. Edmonds. - Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2024. - P. 53-63.
37. Lindgren S., Kaun A. Programmable politics in the aftermaths of the pandemic // Media, Culture & Society. - 2024. - Vol. 47. - Iss. 3. - P. 613-623. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437241301616.
38. Margetts H. Cyber parties // Handbook of Party Politics. / Ed. by R.S. Katz, W. Crotty. SAGE Publications Ltd, 2006. - P. 528-535.
39. Milivojevic S. Artificial intelligence, illegalised mobility and lucrative alchemy of border utopia // Criminology & Criminal Justice. - 2022. - Vol. 2. - Iss. 2. - P. 630-648. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958221123855.
40. Mompó A., Meloni M., Barberà O., Lupato F., Sandri G., Nostitz von, F. When do parties go digital? Examining the drivers of internal and external party digitalisation // Party Politics. - 2025. - 0(0). - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688251339977. URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13540688251339977 (data obrascheniya: 09.01.2026).
41. Mutlu C.E., Frowd P.M., Muller B. The appification of borders: Data, migration and digitalization // Big Data & Society. - 2025. - Vol. 12. - Iss. 2. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517251319996. URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20539517251319996 (data obrascheniya: 09.01.2026).
42. Nemitz P. Constitutional democracy and technology in the age of artificial intelligence // Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. - 2018. - Vol. 376. - Iss. 2133. - P. 20180089. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0089.
43. Roberts T., Oosterom M. Digital authoritarianism: a systematic literature review // Information Technology for Development. - 2025. - Vol. 31. - Iss. 4. - P. 860–884. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2024.2425352.
44. Rolf S., Schindler S. The US–China rivalry and the emergence of state platform capitalism // Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. - 2023. - Vol. 55. - Iss. 5. - P. 1255-1280. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X221146545.
45. Ronfeldt D. Cyberocracy Is Coming // The Information Society. - 1992. - Vol. 8. - Iss. 4. - P. 243-296. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.1992.9960123.
46. Trautendorfer J., Hohensinn L., Hilgers D. Contrasting Information Demand and Information Supply: Digital Platforms as Intermediaries of Citizen-Government Interaction // Information Polity. - 2025. - Vol. 30. - Iss. 4. - P. 321-337. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/15701255251393049.
47. Udupa S. Shadow Politics: Commercial Digital Influencers, “Data,” and Disinformation in India // Social Media + Society. - 2024. - Vol. 10. - Iss. 1. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231224719.
48. Vaccari C., Valeriani A. Digital Political Talk and Political Participation: Comparing Established and Third Wave Democracies // Sage Open. - 2018. - Vol. 8. - Iss. 2. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018784986. URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244018784986 (data obrascheniya: 09.01.2026).
49. Woolley S.C., Howard P.N. Political communication, computational propaganda, and autonomous agents - Introduction // International Journal of Communication. - 2016. - Vol. 10. - P. 4882–4890.
50. Zúñiga de, G.H., Veenstra A., Vraga, E., Shah D. Digital Democracy: Reimagining Pathways to Political Participation // Journal of Information Technology & Politics. - 2010. - Vol. 7. - Iss. 1. - P. 36–51. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/19331680903316742.
