The purpose of the study is to examine the efforts of universities in Anglo–Saxon countries to support student parents in the context of national pro-natalist strategies. This study focuses on the motivations, approaches, and outcomes of corporate demographic policies in foreign — specifically Anglo-Saxon — countries. These policies are examined in relation to national pronatalist models. This is a review article. The author uses discourse analysis to structure and interpret scholarly publications and expert reports by American, British, Australian, and Canadian researchers who have analyzed the situation of student parents in their respective countries, as well as university and national policies concerning this category of students. A comparative approach is employed throughout the study. The author considers international experience in the context of the development in Russia of a new type of university corporate demographic policy — one that envisages the involvement of universities in the implementation of a national policy. The publications reviewed are generally based on empirical data obtained through sociological instruments (surveys, focus groups, in-depth interviews). These instruments are used to identify the social problems of student parents, as well as to determine the nature and extent of the impact of university and/or national demographic policies on this category of students. In the countries analyzed, university efforts to support student parents appear fragmented and do not form part of, or serve as an extension of, their national demographic policy. Universities that support student-parents are motivated by commercial considerations consistent with the idea of providing equal educational opportunities to all categories of students. These corporate policies are not aimed at supporting student families or at reversing the trend toward an increasing maternal age at first birth. The practical significance of this study is in the clarification of the prospects of an inertial scenario for Russia, according to which the only driver for the adoption of support measures by universities is commercial motives: to reduce dropout rates among students with children. Also of practical utility is a summary of the challenges faced by student parents. These challenges appear to be, to some extent, universal, and addressing (or mitigating) them constitutes an important objective of demographic policy.
demographic policy, university corporate policy, pronatalism, student parents, Anglo-Saxon countries
1. Bagirova A.P., Kolchinskaya V.Yu., Sokolovaa E.Yu., Abilova M.G. Novye vozmozhnosti vovlecheniya vuzov v demograficheskuyu povestku: regional'nyy keys // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. – 2025. – T. 34. – № 4. – S. 80–100. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-4-80-100.
2. Bagirova A.P., Neshataev A.V., Vavilova A.S., Levshic A.D. Roditel'stvo v studenchestve: vozmozhnosti sovmescheniya zhiznennyh strategiy // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. – 2024. – T. 33. – № 7. – S. 32–49. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-7-32-49.
3. Bezruchenko T.E., Fedorova E.V. Aktualizaciya idey K.D. Ushinskogo v sovremennoy sisteme vysshego obrazovaniya kak uslovie stanovleniya studencheskoy sem'i // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Problemy vysshego obrazovaniya. – 2024. – № 3. – C. 61–64.
4. Vilkova K.A., Gruzdev I.A., Shmeleva E.D., Tarasova E.A., Starcev S.V. Chto my znaem o studencheskih sem'yah: sociologicheskiy analiz // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. – 2024. – T. 33. – № 7. – S. 67–83. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-7-67-83.
5. Karepina O.I., Bogoslavceva L.V., Bogdanova O.Yu. K voprosu o roli studencheskoy sem'i v realizacii demograficheskoy politiki // Regional'nye problemy preobrazovaniya ekonomiki. – 2025. – № 6. – S. 390–399. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26726/rppe2025v6otrot.
6. Konstantinova L.V., Minashkin V.G., Kargapolova E.V., Shubenkova E.V., Aleksandrova E.V., Vorozhihin V.V., Petrov A.M., Titova E.S., Troska Z.A., Iskandaryan R.A., Mayakov D.M., Nikonova O.D. Formirovanie universitetov kak uchastnikov gosudarstvennoy semeynoy i demograficheskoy politiki. Rezul'taty monitoringa informacii o tendenciyah razvitiya vysshego obrazovaniya v mire i v Rossii. Moskva: REU im. G. V. Plehanova, 2026. 196 c.
7. Rostovskaya E.K., Vasil'eva E.N., Nikol'skiy V.S. Parametry blagopoluchiya studencheskoy sem'i v sovremennoy Rossii: osnovnye problemy i poisk resursov // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. – 2024. – T. 33. – № 7. – S. 15–31. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-7-15-31.
8. Rostovskaya T.K., Pachin A.V. Studencheskaya sem'ya kak klyuchevoe napravlenie novogo nacional'nogo proekta «Sem'ya» // DEMIS. Demograficheskie issledovaniya. – 2025. – T. 5. – № 1. – S. 152–166. DOI:https://doi.org/10.19181/demis.2025.5.1.9.
9. Ajayi K.V., Odonkor G., Panjwani S., Aremu O., Garney W., McKyer L.E. Socio-ecological barriers to student-parents academic success: A systematic review // Journal of Further and Higher Education. – 2022. – Vol. 46. – Iss. 9. – P. 1257–1274. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2022.2065629.
10. Andrewartha L., Knight E., Simpson A., Beattie H. Balancing the books: How we can better support students who are parents // Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. – 2023. – Vol. 45. – Iss. 2. – P. 160–173. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2023.2180164.
11. Briegel M., Jakubec S., Shippey-Heilman A., Paxton B. Barriers and supports for student-parents in higher education // Transformative Dialogues: Teaching and Learning Journal. – 2023. – Vol. 15. – Iss. 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26209/td2023vol15iss31759.
12. Brown V., Nichols T.R. Pregnant and parenting students on campus: Policy and program implications for a growing population // Educational Policy. – 2013. – Vol. 27. – Iss. 3. – P. 499–530. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904812453995.
13. Cho S.H., Roy R.N., Dayne N. Student–parents’ mental health: Factors affecting anxiety and depression // Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal. – 2021. – Vol. 49. – Iss. 3. – P. 254–269. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.12391.
14. Clayton C., Fletcher K., Elvidge G. Accessing and experiencing higher education: Young fathers in the UK // Research in Post-Compulsory Education. – 2024. – Vol. 29. – Iss. 3. – P. 381–407. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2024.2371645.
15. Dotterer A.M., Juhasz A.C., Murphy K.N., Park S., Boyce L.K. Stress and family relationships among college student parents: A mixed methods study // Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. – 2021. – Vol. 38. – Iss. 3. – P. 888–911. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520975198.
16. Duffy S., O’Shea M., Ewald A., Gilbert E. Problematising the invisibility of student parents in Australian higher education // Higher Education Research & Development. – 2026. – Vol. 45. – Iss. 4. – P. 984–998. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2025.2573979.
17. Lovell E.D. College students who are parents need equitable services for retention // Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice. – 2014. – Vol. 16. – Iss. 2. – P. 187–202. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.16.2.b.
18. Moreau M.-P., Kerner C. Supporting Student Parents in Higher Education: A Policy Analysis. Luton (UK): University of Bedfordshire, 2012. 80 p. URL: https://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/files/Moreau%20-%20Nuffield%20full %20report.pdf (data obrascheniya: 06.05.2026).
19. Thévenon O. Family policies in OECD countries: A comparative analysis // Population and Development Review. – 2011. – Vol. 37. – Iss. 1. – P. 57–87. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011. 00390.x.
20. Todd A. Student-parents experiences of personal and academic support in UK higher education: Barriers and challenges to equality of opportunity and policy and practice recommendations to mitigate them // Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning. – 2024. – Vol. 26. – Iss. 3. – P. 143–171. DOI: doihttps://doi.org/10.5456/WPLL.26.3.143.
21. Usick B.L. An Examination of Policies and Practices Within Western Canadian Research-Intensive Universities That Support Students with Family Responsibilities: Doctoral thesis. Calgary (Canada): University of Calgary, 2023. 242 p. DOI:https://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/41494.
22. Williams B., Bitar J., Polk P., Nguyen A., Montague G., Gillispie C., Waller A., Tadesse A., Elliott K.C. For Student Parents, the Biggest Hurdles to a Higher Education Are Cost and Finding Child Care. Washington (DC): Education Trust, 2022. 32 p. URL: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED622827 (data obrascheniya: 06.05.2026).
