from 01.10.2008 until now
Russian Federation
Many of the Department are filled with non-professionals in the field of geometry. Moreover: they are headed also by nonprofessionals, i.e. they are professionals completely, in other areas specialists who are professionals in a different direction (defended the graduate school not towards 05.01.01 — Engineering geometry and computer graphics). Descriptive same geometry is the theory of images, even beyond: the science of mapping from one space to another. On the other hand, descriptive geometry is the basis of geometric design. This science in Russia continues times it may develop, although not as fast as before. Opposition of descriptive geometry and computer graphics should be considered a fatal mistake — they have not to antithetic, but to develop parallel to each other. Descriptive geometry is so to say the last Bastion in the geometrical education specialists, so it should not be disposed as educational discipline and vice versa-give it new life. The confrontation between the defenders of descriptive geometry and its opponents is the confrontation between those who wish to prepare creative young people and those who may be unconsciously, intends to prepare pure consumers. Gaspar Monge wrote your textbook is not for draftsmen. His famous textbook was sent for training artists, and Monge has repeatedly appealed to him from the pages of the book. He suggested that developed the course in descriptive geometry, not as a set of interesting geometric problems, and as a solution to a specific applied problems inherent in industry and construction, and art, and the military. Log that we´ve created, that´s why is called "Geometry and graphics", because the geometry of the primary and secondary graphics. Descriptive geometry geometric model into graphic we can observe on the display screen. The question is that, say, descriptive geometry as a science has exhausted itself, and therefore it is not necessary to teach, very dangerous from the point of view of pedagogy, because the end result will necessarily lead to degradation and primitivization learning and to release uneducated staff. The juxtaposition of descriptive geometry and computer graphics should be considered a strategic mistake. These two subjects (just as an academic discipline) should not be opposed, and to develop parallel to each other, to complement each other.
descriptive geometry, higher education, geometricgraphic education.
1. Asekritova S.V., Puchkov I.A. Ispol´zovanie rezul´tatov nauchno-issledovatel´skih rabot studentov v processe prepodavanija graficheskih disciplin [Using of students’ research scientific work results during the teaching of graphic disciplines]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics], 2013, V. 1, I. 1, pp. 75-76. (in Russian).
2. Bogoljubov A.N. Gaspar Monzh [Gaspard Monge]. Moscow, NAUKA Publ., 1978. 184 p. (in Russian).
3. Volkov V.Ja., Kajgorodceva N.V., Panchuk K.L. Sovremennye napravlenija i perspektivy razvitija nauchnyh issledovanij po geometrii i grafike: obzor: dokladov na mezhdunarodnoj konferencii ICGG 2014 [Modern trends and prospects of development of scientific researches in geometry and graph: review: papers at the international conference ICGG 2014]. Problemy kachestva graficheskoj podgotovki studentov v tehnicheskom vuze: tradicii i innovacii. [Problems the quality of graphic training of students in technical College: traditions and innovations], 2015, V. 2, I. 1, pp. 99-110. (in Russian).
4. Volkova M.Ju., Egorycheva E.V. Graficheskaja gramotnost´ inzhenera kak sposob poluchenija fundamental´nyh professional´nyh znanij [Engineer´s Graphic Literacy as a Way of Fundamental Professional Knowledge Obtaining]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics], 2013, V. 2, I. 1, pp. 53-57. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/3849. (in Russian)
5. Voloshinov D.V., Solomonov K.N. Konstruktivnoe geometricheskoe modelirovanie kak perspektiva prepodavanija graficheskih disciplin [Constructive geometric modeling as graphic disciplines’ teaching prospect]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics], 2013, V. 1, I. 2, pp. 10-13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/778. (in Russian).
6. Vyshnepol´skij V.I., Salkov N.A. Celi i metody obuchenija graficheskim disciplinam [The aims and methods of teaching graphic disciplines]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics], 2013, V. 1, I. 2, pp. 8-9. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/777. (in Russian).
7. Gumen N.S. Geometricheskie osnovy teorii mnogoobrazij evklidovogo n-prostranstva primenitel´no k geometricheskomu modelirovaniju mnogoparametricheskih system. Doct. Diss. [Geometric fundamentals of the theory of manifolds in Euclidean n-space with respect to the geometric modeling of multivariable systems. Doct. Diss.]. 05.01.01, Kiev, 1992. (in Russian).
8. Ivanov G.S. Kompetentnostnyj podhod k soderzhaniju kursa nachertatel´noj geometrii [Competence approach to descriptive geometry syllabus]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics], 2013, V.1, I. 2, pp. 3-5. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/775. (in Russian).
9. Ivanov G.S. Perspektivy nachertatel´noj geometrii kak uchebnoj discipliny [Prospects of descriptive geometry as an academic discipline]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics], 2013, V. 1, I. 1, pp. 26-27. (in Russian). DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/2081.
10. Ivanov G.S. Teoreticheskie osnovy nachertatel´noj geometrii [Theoretical fundamentals of descriptive geometry]. Moscow, Mashinostroenie, 1988. 158 p. (in Russian).
11. Ishhenko A.A. K voprosu o neobhodimosti prepodavanija nachertatel´noj geometrii i grafiki dlja himikov i himikovtehnologov [To the question about the necessity of descriptive geometry and graphics teaching for chemists and chemical technologists]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics], 2013, V. 1, I. 2, pp. 6-7. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/776. (in Russian).
12. Korotkij V.A., Hmarova L.I. Nachertatel´naja geometrija na jekrane komp´jutera [Descriptive geometry on the computer screen]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics], 2013, V. 1, I. 1, pp. 32-34. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/2083 (in Russian).
13. Leparov M.N., Popov M.H. Sostojanie i tendencii geometro-graficheskoj podgotovki kak komponenty inzhenernogo obrazovanija v Bolgarii [Status and Trends of Geometrical-Graphic Training as a Component of Engineering Education in Bulgaria]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics], 2013, V. 2, I. 1, pp. 22-29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/3845. (in Russian).
14. Malahovskaja V.V. K voprosu organizacii uchebnogo processa po graficheskim discipltinam v vuzah Belorusi [To the question of educational process organization on graphic disciplines in Belarusian high education institutions]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics], 2013, V. 1, I. 2, pp. 38-41. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/786. (in Russian).
15. Matusevich V.Ja., Salkov N.A. Sistema distancionnogo obrazovanija i geometro-graficheskie discipliny [System of remote education and geometrical and graphic disciplines]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics], 2013, V. 1, I. 1, pp. 54-55. (in Russian).
16. Monzh G. Nachertatel´naja geometriya [Descriptive geometry]. Leningrad, Izdatel´stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR Publ., 1947. 292 p. (in Russian).
17. Peklich V.A. Mnimaya nachertatel´naya geometriya [Imaginary descriptive geometry]. Moscow, Izdatel´stvo Associacii stroitel´nyh vuzov Publ., 2007. 104 p. (in Russian).
18. Polushina T.A. Internet-trenazher po nachertatel´noj geometrii i inzhenernoj grafike v uchebnom processe [Internet simulator on descriptive geometry and engineering graphics in educational]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics], 2013, V. 1, I. 2, pp. 33-37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/910. (in Russian).
19. Privalov I.I., Judina E.Ju., Remontova L.V. Aktivizacija motivacionnoj sostavljajushhej processa obuchenija geometro-graficheskim disciplinam [Activation of motivational component related to training process in geometric and graphic disciplines]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics], 2013, V. 1, I. 2, pp. 42-43. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/787. (in Russian).
20. Rahmetova Sh.T. Konstruirovanie ogibajushhih na baze formirovanija odnoparametricheskih mnozhestv poverhnostej. Kand. Diss. [The construction of the envelopes on the basis of the formation of one-parameter sets of surfaces. Cand. Diss.]. Moscow, MADI Publ., 1990. 16 p. (in Russian).
21. Ryzhov N.N. Parametricheskaja geometrija [Parametric geometry]. Moscow, MADI Publ., 1988. 56 p. (in Russian).
22. Rynin N.A. Znachenie nachertatel´noj geometrii i sravnitel´naja ocenka glavnejshih ee metodov [The value of descriptive geometry and comparative evaluation of the main methods]. Petrograd, Izdatel´stvo Ju.N. Jerlih Publ., 1907. 96 p. (in Russian).
23. Salkov N.A. Analiz FGOSov novogo pokoleniya [Analysis of Federal State Educational Standards (FSES) of new generation]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics]. 2013, V. 1, I. 1, pр. 28-31. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/2082 (in Russian).
24. Salkov N.A. Iskusstvo i nachertatel´naja geometriya [Art and Descriptive Geometry]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics]. 2013, V. 1, I. 3-4, pp. 3-7. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/2123. (in Russian).
25. Salkov N.A. Kurs nachertatel´noy geometrii Gaspara Monzha [Gaspard Monge’s Descriptive Geometry Course]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics], 2013, V. 1, I. 3-4, pp. 52-56. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12373/2135. (in Russian).
26. Salkov N.A. Modelirovanie avtomobil´nyh dorog [Modeling of highways]. Moscow, Infra-M Publ., 2012. 120 p. (in Russian).
27. Sal´kov N.A. Nachertatel´naya geometriya - baza dlya komp´juternoy grafiki [Descriptive geometry - the basis for computer graphics]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics]. 2016, V. 4, I. 2, pр. 37-47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/. (in Russian).
28. Salkov N.A. Nachertatel´naja geometriya: bazovyj kurs [Descriptive geometry. Basic course]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2013. 184 p. (in Russian).
29. Salkov N.A. Nachertatel´naja geometi do 1917 goda [Descriptive Geometry until 1917]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics], 2013, V. 1., I. 2, pp. 18-20. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/780. (in Russian).
30. Salkov N.A. Jellips: kasatel´naja i normal´ [Ellipse: tangent and normal]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics], 2013, V. 1, I. 1, pp. 35-37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/2084. (in Russian).
31. Stolbova I.D. Aktual´nye problemy graficheskoj podgotovki studentov v tehnicheskih vuzah [Actual Problems of Graphic Training of Students at Technical High Educational Institutions]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics], 2013, V. 2, I. 1, pp. 30-41. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/3846. (in Russian).
32. Tihonov-Bugrov D.E. O nekotoryh problemah graficheskoj podgotovki v tehnicheskih vuzah (vzgljad iz Sankt-Peterburga) [On Some Problems of Graphics Training at Technical High Educational Institutions (view from St. Petersburg)]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics], 2013, V. 2, I. 1, pp. 46-53. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12373/3848. (in Russian).
33. Filippov P.V. Nachertatel´naya geometrija mnogomernogo prostranstva i ee prilozheniya [Descriptive geometry of multidimensional space and its applications]. Leningrad, 1979. 280 p.
34. Frolov S.A., Pokrovskaja M.V. V poiskah nachala: Rasskazy o nachertatel´noy geometrii [In search of a beginning: Stories of descriptive geometry]. Minsk, «Vyshjejshaja. shkola» Publ., 1985, 189 p.
35. Jakunin V.I., Ivanov G.S. Sud´bu nachertatel´noy geometrii dolzhny opredeljat´ specialisty [The fate of descriptive geometry must determine assistants]. Sovremennye problemy informatizacii geometricheskoy i graficheskoy podgotovki inzhenerov. Saratov, 2007, pp. 3-7. (in Russian).
